I fixed it by cheating. I noticed on another (identical) server the
sendmail.cf was a different size so for some reason restarting sendmail
hadn't been updating the sendmail.cf so I copied the 'old' sendmail.cf over
to the new server and restarted sendmail and now SA is scanning mail
correctly. Be
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 18:46 -0500, Dave Funk wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, Chuck Campbell wrote:
> > I have SA set up and working (mostly) on my mail machine, however I've put
> > the
> > following into my user_prefs:
> > I don't see any reference to my whitelisting, is it not working as I
> > an
ps/edit: having looked at the headers of incoming emails it seems that
sendmail is not passing the mail to mimedefang, but I've checked several
times and the INPUT_MAIL_FILTER entry is there and correct in sendmail.mc
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/SA-not-picking-up-users
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
> How do you connect SA to the mail system? The answer depends on that.
>
I'm using mimedefang-2.70-1.el4.rf. I have the correct 'INPUT_MAIL_FILTER..'
entry in sendmail.mc, no errors with md syntax. sa-mimedefang.cf is all
correct. SA seems to be unaware of the users.
On 19.9.2010 20:57, tonjg wrote:
>
> I've just built up a web/mail server running centos 4.8 and installed
> spamassassin-3.3.1-3.el4.rf. I then set SA up and got good results with the
> usual test commands. After this I then imported all the virtual sites and
> users from another backup, but spam
I've just built up a web/mail server running centos 4.8 and installed
spamassassin-3.3.1-3.el4.rf. I then set SA up and got good results with the
usual test commands. After this I then imported all the virtual sites and
users from another backup, but spamassassin is unaware of them and is not
scan
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, Joseph Brennan wrote:
> On fre 17 sep 2010 00:30:27 CEST, Chris Owen wrote
> > 1) From yahoo.com
> > 2) Have a HTML attachment
> > 3) Are base64 encoded
The html includes something like this, inside a comment. It's really