Is anybody else seeing their list posts echoed back to them via
mail.mail.rss.rogers.com?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, RW wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 09:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Tony Finch wrote:
sa-update for version 3.3 is usually very quiet - last update 4
July; previous one 12 June. We have been getting daily updates
since Saturday morning. Is this expec
On 08/09/10 16:10, Mike Bro wrote:
Thanks for your interest in this topic. The part of mail.log and the
qf file is at:
http://pastebin.com/0QzqLxs1
This particular example has been marked as spam, but the sender's
information didn't play a role in this classification.
Re: Joseph Brennan:
Why d
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 09:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Tony Finch wrote:
>
> > sa-update for version 3.3 is usually very quiet - last update 4
> > July; previous one 12 June. We have been getting daily updates
> > since Saturday morning. Is this expected?
>
> It's expe
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, John Hardin wrote:
>
> It's expected and very welcome. It means the age-limited nightly masscheck
> corpora have once again gotten large enough that the score generator can
> safely publish updated rules and scores on a regular basis.
Ah, good news :-)
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.fi
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Mike Bro wrote:
I cannot afford rejecting all null senders as those could be
legitimate Delivery Status Notification messages.
What I am looking is a pattern for line:
MAIL FROM: <"do not mock at your poetenncy - bujyj vjaqrra ppislls" <>>
while I want to allow:
MAIL FROM: <
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Tony Finch wrote:
sa-update for version 3.3 is usually very quiet - last update 4 July;
previous one 12 June. We have been getting daily updates since Saturday
morning. Is this expected?
It's expected and very welcome. It means the age-limited nightly masscheck
corpora hav
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010, jdow wrote:
From: "John Hardin"
Sent: Tuesday, 2010/September/07 10:02
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010, Per Jessen wrote:
> John Hardin wrote:
>
> > > Sorry to mislead. SPAM was caught by spamassassin.
> > > How can I get this guy stopped?
> > > IP addresses are: 67.50.37.35,.3
On Sep 7, 2010, at 6:36 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
> On 9/7/2010 7:11 PM, William Taylor wrote:
>> I want to be able to only allow a certain email to be sent from one of
>> several hosts.
>>
>> Currently im doing something like:
>>
>> blacklist_from sa...@foo.com
>> whitelist_from_rcvd sa..
Hi!
On Mit, 2010-09-08 at 16:45 +0100, Mike Bro wrote:
[...]
> You wrote:
> > The .qf file is not visible to SpamAssassin. SA only looks at the email
> > and headers. If you want to reject/score based on the envelope sender,
> > you will need to either do it at the MTA level or find out if sendm
On 9/8/2010 11:45 AM, Mike Bro wrote:
> Hi Bowie,
>
> You wrote:
>> The .qf file is not visible to SpamAssassin. SA only looks at the email
>> and headers. If you want to reject/score based on the envelope sender,
>> you will need to either do it at the MTA level or find out if sendmail
>> puts
Hi Bowie,
You wrote:
> The .qf file is not visible to SpamAssassin. SA only looks at the email
> and headers. If you want to reject/score based on the envelope sender,
> you will need to either do it at the MTA level or find out if sendmail
> puts the information into a header that SA can see.
> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 13:20:56 +0200
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > using clamav directly, without SA, is more effective. ClamAV plugin
> > seems to be OK for checking for things like phishes or strustured
> > data like credit card numbers, in which case it may cause false
> > positives.
On 0
On 9/8/2010 11:10 AM, Mike Bro wrote:
> Thanks for your interest in this topic. The part of mail.log and the
> qf file is at:
> http://pastebin.com/0QzqLxs1
>
> This particular example has been marked as spam, but the sender's
> information didn't play a role in this classification.
>
> Re: Joseph
Thanks for your interest in this topic. The part of mail.log and the
qf file is at:
http://pastebin.com/0QzqLxs1
This particular example has been marked as spam, but the sender's
information didn't play a role in this classification.
Re: Joseph Brennan:
> Why doesn't sendmail reject it like it do
sa-update for version 3.3 is usually very quiet - last update 4 July;
previous one 12 June. We have been getting daily updates since Saturday
morning. Is this expected?
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
HUMBER THAMES DOVER WIGHT PORTLAND: NORTH BACKING WEST OR NORTHWEST, 5 TO 7,
DECR
16 matches
Mail list logo
