On Sun, 5 Sep 2010, COGZ wrote:
The problem with editing the users .mailfilter file is that they could
overwrite it with their control panel. Seems like a shell script wrapper
would be best. Any suggestions on how to configure?
Is there any way you can hook control panel to throw a warning if
The problem with editing the users .mailfilter file is that they could
overwrite it with their control panel. Seems like a shell script wrapper
would be best. Any suggestions on how to configure?
John Hardin wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Sep 2010, COGZ wrote:
>
>> I know there are a number of ways to
In the last several weeks I have been receiving a lot of spam with email
addresses of the form:
learningmadeeasy.???...@??.yourseemlost.net
learningmadeeasy.???...@??.hisoftenusing.net
learningmadeeasy.???...@??.wheatdrinkcontrol.net
learningmadeeasy....@??.actbookfelt.net
lea
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 12:54 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Sep 2010, Chris wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 12:33 -0500, Len Conrad wrote:
> >>> Mem:772880k total, 685316k used,87564k free,31344k buffers
> >>> Swap: 1076312k total, 249032k used, 827280k free, 156328k
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 20:02 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 08:42 -0500, Chris wrote:
> > I'm trying to figure out why I'm having ridiculous scan times such as
> > the above examples. Lower scan times such as in the 20 second range are
> > the exception rather than the rul
On Sun, 5 Sep 2010, Chris wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 12:33 -0500, Len Conrad wrote:
Mem:772880k total, 685316k used,87564k free,31344k buffers
Swap: 1076312k total, 249032k used, 827280k free, 156328k cached
250MB swapped, for less than 1 GB RAM, used is disastrous for
On Sun, 5 Sep 2010, COGZ wrote:
I know there are a number of ways to limit the size of a messages that
are scanned with spamassasin, but I am having problems with
configurations. Spamc seems to have this capability already build in by
default. Is there a config file that I can change to call s
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 08:42 -0500, Chris wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out why I'm having ridiculous scan times such as
> the above examples. Lower scan times such as in the 20 second range are
> the exception rather than the rule. I'm running bind as a local caching
Do you use the URICountry plug
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 12:33 -0500, Len Conrad wrote:
> >Mem:772880k total, 685316k used,87564k free,31344k buffers
> >Swap: 1076312k total, 249032k used, 827280k free, 156328k cached
>
> 250MB swapped, for less than 1 GB RAM, used is disastrous for an MTA.
>
> Increase RAM
>Mem:772880k total, 685316k used,87564k free,31344k buffers
>Swap: 1076312k total, 249032k used, 827280k free, 156328k cached
250MB swapped, for less than 1 GB RAM, used is disastrous for an MTA.
Increase RAM to 2GB, or until swap is always "0k used"
Len
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 09:18 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Sep 2010, Chris wrote:
>
> > Running an X session, and I noticed that this is back:
>
> How much memory in that box?
>
754Mb and 1Gb swap, top shows
top - 12:16:19 up 51 days, 16:18, 2 users, load average: 0.31, 0.37,
0.65
Tas
I know there are a number of ways to limit the size of a messages that are
scanned with spamassasin, but I am having problems with configurations.
Spamc seems to have this capability already build in by default. Is there a
config file that I can change to call spamc when the call is made from the
On Sat, 4 Sep 2010, Chris wrote:
Running an X session, and I noticed that this is back:
How much memory in that box?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 07:35 -0500, Shane Williams wrote:
> In several places, Justin Mason has said the sysread debug line
> doesn't necessarily indicate an error (he actually says they're
> normal in debug mode), though these are fairly old posts.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/users@spamassassi
In several places, Justin Mason has said the sysread debug line
doesn't necessarily indicate an error (he actually says they're
normal in debug mode), though these are fairly old posts.
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@spamassassin.apache.org/msg31175.html
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbo
15 matches
Mail list logo
