On fre 27 aug 2010 01:30:41 CEST, LAWRENCE WILLIAMS wrote
I figured as such. Either way, I have the following at the end of my local.cf
file (which I confirmed SA 3.3.1 is using, as I used it to tweak
Bayes autolearn
settings and they are in effect).
# Look up e-mail links in variable DNS BL
I figured as such. Either way, I have the following at the end of my local.cf
file (which I confirmed SA 3.3.1 is using, as I used it to tweak Bayes
autolearn
settings and they are in effect).
# Look up e-mail links in variable DNS BLs
# Make sure plugin is loaded first
loadplugin Mail::SpamAss
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
LAWRENCE WILLIAMS wrote:
> I am getting nothing hitting on it. I had one e-mail with a link
> directly to midpage dot ru (HTML link) and nothing was triggered.
> What do you have set for skip_rbl_checks?
>
I don't set it, or skip_uribl_checks.
On fre 27 aug 2010 00:09:51 CEST, LAWRENCE WILLIAMS wrote
I am getting nothing hitting on it. I had one e-mail with a link directly to
midpage dot ru (HTML link) and nothing was triggered. What do you
have set for skip_rbl_checks?
this is not urls, but ip blacklisted dns ip
url is another
I am getting nothing hitting on it. I had one e-mail with a link directly to
midpage dot ru (HTML link) and nothing was triggered. What do you have set for
skip_rbl_checks?
From: RW
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Thu, August 26, 2010 7:26:49 PM
Subj
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
LAWRENCE WILLIAMS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed SpamAssassin 3.3.1 from CPAN (running CentOS 5.5) 5 days
> ago and have it running as a daemon (spamd).
>
> I see that support for the SpamHaus DBL was added in 3.3.1, but it
> seems to be disabled by defaul
Hi,
I installed SpamAssassin 3.3.1 from CPAN (running CentOS 5.5) 5 days ago and
have it running as a daemon (spamd).
I see that support for the SpamHaus DBL was added in 3.3.1, but it seems to be
disabled by default (I've had several near-spam messages come in that contain
domains listed in t
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:25:22 +0200
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> I bet the biggest is bayes_seen.
> You can safely delete the bayes_seen file (unless you plan to
> "unlearn" msgs). I will stzart growing again, fast.
If the account has never been expired, bayes_seen is likely to be
negligible compa
This already moved mostly off-list, but for the records...
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 15:41 +0200, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
> I've been out of office (better: out-of-oder ;)) for some days. Of
> course I'll provide you some samples. I've spoken to some of our
> customers and they have agreed, that I may s
On 2010-08-26 16:11, Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
I have serveral hundred domains on a box. Each domain's mail is
controlled by a specific UNIX user.
Inside every user's directory, they have a user_prefs file.
While I have use_bayes 0 in the main config, some users have opted to
turn on bayes
On 8/26/2010 10:11 AM, Grant Peel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have serveral hundred domains on a box. Each domain's mail is
> controlled by a specific UNIX user.
>
> Inside every user's directory, they have a user_prefs file.
>
> While I have use_bayes 0 in the main config, some users have opted to
> t
Hi all,
I have serveral hundred domains on a box. Each domain's mail is controlled
by a specific UNIX user.
Inside every user's directory, they have a user_prefs file.
While I have use_bayes 0 in the main config, some users have opted to turn
on bayes in thier user_prefs.
This morning I no
Am 25.8.2010 22:47, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
>
> Jan, any chance you could provide the paragraphs or text parts
> corresponding to the seeks?
>
> Just to clarify: We do *not* require the full message, even though it
> makes things simpler. In fact, no headers (other than Subject) are ever
> u
Guys,
Thanks for time and effort on this.
Consider this matter closed.
Mup.
14 matches
Mail list logo
