On 8/18/2010 9:24 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
On 8/18/2010 6:14 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 8/18/2010 4:46 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 12:38 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Registering with a white list doesn't reduce spam. It reduces false
positives when you send email.
On 8/18/2010 6:14 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 8/18/2010 4:46 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 12:38 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Registering with a white list doesn't reduce spam. It reduces false
positives when you send email.
If you want to reduce spam however you could ad
On 8/18/2010 4:46 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 12:38 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Registering with a white list doesn't reduce spam. It reduces false
positives when you send email.
If you want to reduce spam however you could add this MX record as your
highest numbered MX
Please do NOT reply to an unrelated message, if you actually intend to
start a new thread. In-Reply-To and References headers make your post
appear as a reply to another post. You just hi-jacked a thread.
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 01:21 +0100, s...@yacc.co.uk wrote:
> A release or two ago, default inc
Guys,
A release or two ago, default inclusion of Postmaster and Abuse lists at
RFC-Ignorant.org were turned off (some will say for good reason).
What is easiest way to turn them back on again?
Thanks
Mup.
> On the other hand, back to topic, Barracuda rejecting for mail originating
> on a dialup line is just crazy. We've seen it too.
And it has been mentioned here, and in other places on the net, before.
Yes, indeed, there appears to be an issue with Barracuda appliances'
configuration in "certain
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 12:38 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Registering with a white list doesn't reduce spam. It reduces false
> positives when you send email.
>
> If you want to reduce spam however you could add this MX record as your
> highest numbered MX.
>
> tarbaby. [...]
Ahem.
Marc, your i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have it working here:
8.0-STABLE
8.1-RELEASE-p0
8.0-RELEASE-p3
9-CURRENT
previously:
7-STABLE
as well both at $work and on mx1.(eu|us).apache.org
I don't use default OPTIONS but all I run is make install.
It even works with pkg_add afte
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:46:02 -0400
Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
> On 8/18/10 4:44 PM, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
> >
> > Yes, was at 8.0 p2 when I installed it I believe, and worked
> > without probs. (with perl 5.10.1)
> >
> Thanks.
> You might not want to go to 8.0 p4 until the problem is figured
On 8/18/10 4:44 PM, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
Yes, was at 8.0 p2 when I installed it I believe, and worked without
probs. (with perl 5.10.1)
Thanks.
You might not want to go to 8.0 p4 until the problem is figured out.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
ISN: 1259*1300
Quoting Michael Scheidell :
Had a report from a user who installed SA 3.3.1 from freebsd ports
with perl 5.10.1 on a Freebsd AMD64 build, Freebsd 8.0, p4 and he
noted that the binaries never got installed.
said he default install does a 'make pure_site_install', and he
wasn't able to get it
Had a report from a user who installed SA 3.3.1 from freebsd ports with
perl 5.10.1 on a Freebsd AMD64 build, Freebsd 8.0, p4 and he noted that
the binaries never got installed.
said he default install does a 'make pure_site_install', and he wasn't
able to get it to work without 'make pure_perl_
στις 18/08/2010 10:38 μμ, O/H Marc Perkel έγραψε:
On 8/18/2010 12:29 PM, Sergios T.S. ( aka linuxman) wrote:
στις 18/08/2010 10:03 μμ, O/H Matt έγραψε:
By the way I'm not a big fan of registering my servers to any private
entity in order to improve "deliverability".
Register our servers here
On 8/18/2010 12:29 PM, Sergios T.S. ( aka linuxman) wrote:
στις 18/08/2010 10:03 μμ, O/H Matt έγραψε:
By the way I'm not a big fan of registering my servers to any private
entity in order to improve "deliverability".
Register our servers here: www.dnswl.org Do not really use it for
scoring b
στις 18/08/2010 10:03 μμ, O/H Matt έγραψε:
By the way I'm not a big fan of registering my servers to any private
entity in order to improve "deliverability".
Register our servers here: www.dnswl.org Do not really use it for
scoring but do not grey list any servers listed.
Matt
Hi ,
> By the way I'm not a big fan of registering my servers to any private
> entity in order to improve "deliverability".
Register our servers here: www.dnswl.org Do not really use it for
scoring but do not grey list any servers listed.
Matt
Le mercredi 18 août 2010 à 11:27 -0700, Marc Perkel a écrit :
>
> On 8/18/2010 7:53 AM, Kris Deugau wrote:
> > Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
> >> When other well known DNSBL (I have always heard spamhaus sbl and xbl
> >> are trust worthy) list less at most 50 entries , barrcuda lists
> >> almost 8
On 8/18/2010 7:53 AM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
When other well known DNSBL (I have always heard spamhaus sbl and xbl
are trust worthy) list less at most 50 entries , barrcuda lists
almost 8000
That's not a problem all by itself, but when combined with this:
Finally
On 8/18/2010 4:10 AM, corpus.defero wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 06:36 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 8/17/10 7:30 PM, Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
Hi the list,
I am posting the results of my tests in order to have
fedback/feelings/remarqs.
This is not directly spamassassin related, but ca
Le mercredi 18 août 2010 à 12:10 +0100, corpus.defero a écrit :
> On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 06:36 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > On 8/17/10 7:30 PM, Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
> > > Hi the list,
> > >
> > > I am posting the results of my tests in order to have
> > > fedback/feelings/remarqs.
>
Le mercredi 18 août 2010 à 13:39 -0400, Joseph Brennan a écrit :
> The error message from Barracuda is broken too. Sample:
>
>
> > ... while talking to barracuda.xprize.org.:
> DATA
> > <<< 554 Service unavailable; Client host [tarap.cc.columbia.edu] blocked
> > using Barracuda Reputation;
Le mercredi 18 août 2010 à 06:36 -0400, Michael Scheidell a écrit :
> On 8/17/10 7:30 PM, Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
> > Hi the list,
> >
> > I am posting the results of my tests in order to have
> > fedback/feelings/remarqs.
> > This is not directly spamassassin related, but can be helpful for
>
The error message from Barracuda is broken too. Sample:
... while talking to barracuda.xprize.org.:
DATA
<<< 554 Service unavailable; Client host [tarap.cc.columbia.edu] blocked
using Barracuda Reputation;
http://www.barracudanetworks.com/reputation/?r=1&ip=69.86.203.182
554 5.0.0 Service u
Le mercredi 18 août 2010 à 10:53 -0400, Kris Deugau a écrit :
> Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
> > When other well known DNSBL (I have always heard spamhaus sbl and xbl
> > are trust worthy) list less at most 50 entries , barrcuda lists almost
> > 8000
>
> That's not a problem all by itself, bu
Matt wrote:
Perhaps for authenticated SMTP not record the IP address in the
headers but rather just the authenticated username in the headers. I
think Squirrelmail does that. Your MTA logs will have the IP recorded
if needed later.
From the browser to Squirrelmail is not SMTP.
Gmail is
> > Finally there is a special feature that barrcuda folks call "deep scanning"
> > which makes the appliance scans the 'Received' headers and reject the mails
> > if an IP found in that headers, is listed in the DNSBL... a feature that
> > should obviously be called: 'even increase my false positi
On 18.08.10 16:47, Andrea Gelmini wrote:
> Hi all,
>thanks a lot for the wonderful SpamAssassin.
>
>I'm trying to keep update Wikipedia page about DNS blacklists, also
> adding info about blacklists data available via Rsync, for free.
>I wrote about UceProtect¹ and Surriel.
>I'm ch
> Finally there is a special feature that barrcuda folks call "deep scanning"
> which makes the appliance scans the 'Received' headers and reject the mails
> if an IP found in that headers, is listed in the DNSBL... a feature that
> should obviously be called: 'even increase my false positive rate'
Simply schedule a batch file in 5 min. intervals
-Windows Server 2008 minimum interval is 5 minute-
It's not high cpu or memory consuming process.
You also need freeware *cryping* utility.
I use MailEnable as MTA, you may ignore it.
Script produces 2 files: check.log & error.log
I also test SA scor
Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
When other well known DNSBL (I have always heard spamhaus sbl and xbl
are trust worthy) list less at most 50 entries , barrcuda lists almost
8000
That's not a problem all by itself, but when combined with this:
Finally there is a special feature that barrcuda fo
Hi all,
thanks a lot for the wonderful SpamAssassin.
I'm trying to keep update Wikipedia page about DNS blacklists, also
adding info about blacklists data available via Rsync, for free.
I wrote about UceProtect¹ and Surriel.
I'm checking all of them, but probably you can already point
Thank you so much for the info.
Yes. the monitoring script would be great as well.
Thanks.again.
Jerry
On 8/18/2010 12:53 AM, Emin Akbulut wrote:
Wow, the messages look like rocket science : )
Jerry, I'm happy tha
On 2010-08-18 14:05, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
/etc/mail/spamassassin/sare-sa-update-channels.txt
BE sareful about SARE rules. They are often obsolete, have false positives
and meny of them are already incorporated in stock SA, and some have better
alternatives (uri blacklist vs. hardcode
On 17.08.10 10:06, Mark Chaney wrote:
> I found out the above when trying to use the following howto for SARE
> rule updates: http://www.topdog.za.net/configure_spamassassin.
>
> #
> r...@warpath:~# sa-update --import GPG.KEY
> gpg: keyblock resource `/etc/
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:31 +0200, Josef Karliak wrote:
> > It is needed to run sa-update after every editing of the local.cf
> > or whitelist file?
On 17.08.10 13:46, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> No.
they are something different. However after editing config files (or
sa-update if it updates
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 06:36 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> On 8/17/10 7:30 PM, Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
> > Hi the list,
> >
> > I am posting the results of my tests in order to have
> > fedback/feelings/remarqs.
> > This is not directly spamassassin related, but can be helpful for
> > peopl
On 8/17/10 7:30 PM, Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
Hi the list,
I am posting the results of my tests in order to have
fedback/feelings/remarqs.
This is not directly spamassassin related, but can be helpful for
people (I saw here) wondering if they would used the barracuda DNSBL.
When other well
Just to clarify some things:
Jerry M wrote:
>
> I'm really surprised that there is so little info or support for
> installing spamd a service.
>
The reason, it is not mentioned in the official SpamAssassin docs or Wiki is
because SpamD is not supported for Windows. There are projects like Sa
Hi All,
Am calling the parse function of SpamAssassin module. Am passing the html
message along with all the message headers.
The program returns the same input for all the messages, though the message
data and the message headers contain spammy content.
Please let me know if there are any change
39 matches
Mail list logo
