Microsoft has instructions for this:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/137890
They are for win nt4 and win 2000 but they work on server 2003
(and vista) if you get the tools off the server 2003 resource kit
You can also use the programs off the server 2003 reskit under
server 2008, well at least
I can't seem to find any documentation on how to install spamd as a
Windows service. I found something about getting something called
NTRunner. But that appears to be obsolete. The link is dead. I've
just got spamd running in a command line window. But I need it to be a
service.
I looked
Jason Haar wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 01:04 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>
>> You might consider implementing spamhaus zen as an MTA-level hard
>> reject DNSBL (I do that, maybe that's why I don't see any pharma
>> spam?) - many admins trust it enough to do that, and the sample you
>> posted hit on the a
On 08/17/2010 01:04 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>
> You might consider implementing spamhaus zen as an MTA-level hard
> reject DNSBL (I do that, maybe that's why I don't see any pharma
> spam?) - many admins trust it enough to do that, and the sample you
> posted hit on the abuseat CBL, which is a zen
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Mark Chaney wrote:
When run lint, im getting the following error:
Aug 16 21:47:16.112 [4457] dbg: config: mkdir /var/www/.spamassassin failed:
mkdir /var/www/.spamassassin: Permission denied at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 1853
Though i have no idea what
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Suhag P Desai wrote:
I gone through http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates
Below is my version..
SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.5
running on Perl 5.8.8
with SSL support (IO::Socket::SSL 1.31)
with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.024)
I have two directories.. un
On 8/16/2010 10:19 PM, Suhag P Desai wrote:
I gone throughhttp://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates
Below is my version..
SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.5
running on Perl 5.8.8
with SSL support (IO::Socket::SSL 1.31)
with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.024)
I have two directori
When run lint, im getting the following error:
Aug 16 21:47:16.112 [4457] dbg: config: mkdir /var/www/.spamassassin
failed: mkdir /var/www/.spamassassin: Permission denied at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 1853
Though i have no idea what its for and why it would be trying to writ
I gone through http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates
Below is my version..
SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.5
running on Perl 5.8.8
with SSL support (IO::Socket::SSL 1.31)
with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.024)
I have two directories.. under /var/lib/spamassassin
3.002005 3.003
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Jason Haar wrote:
I didn't give more examples because there is no pattern. I've been
writing our own rules (based on the Subject or body) for weeks and they
never trigger as the sentences don't show up again. The ".ru" thing
isn't an option - those URLs are different too - a
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Jerry M wrote:
I see that there's an update bat file available to refresh the spam
signature file. Is that only a manual process (to update)? Or is there an
auto-update capability built into spamassassin?
Yes, it's called sa-update, and you should be running it daily fr
I see that there's an update bat file available to refresh the spam
signature file. Is that only a manual process (to update)? Or is there
an auto-update capability built into spamassassin?
If it is manual, what is the recommend procedure? Just log on to the
server when spam starts appeari
On man 16 aug 2010 23:28:00 CEST, Jason Haar wrote
I was really just expecting to hear "yeah, me too" responses. :-(
me too
why care of new ru domains ?, blacklist the tld and whitelist ones
that do not spam, maybe meta it with sender domain or something that
match on that domain, i newer
On man 16 aug 2010 22:05:25 CEST, Jason Haar wrote
http://pastebin.com/W6wXq4RX
match on ru tld with a score of 10
and then whitelist specifik ru domains that does not spam with a score of -10
that will neotralize scores for ham from ru domains
there was a spam that included the words "my new
That -c shows what you are doing wrong. "-c /etc/mail/spamassassin" is the
path to the directory. That is what you should use. I am not sure what
SpamAssassin is using for its configuration.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Josef Karliak"
To: "jdow"
Cc:
Sent: Monday, 2010/August/16
On 08/17/2010 08:11 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> Since you only give one example, it's hard to find a good pattern to
> match on. If all of them are going to .ru urls, you could write a rule
> for that. The best thing to do is to take a look at several examples
> and try to figure out what they h
On 8/16/2010 4:05 PM, Jason Haar wrote:
> Hi there
>
> For the past few weeks we've experienced a large increase in missed
> spam. It's Pharma-related, one sentence plus a link.
>
> The interesting features are:
>
> * every Subject line is different. They're aren't Bayes-busters either -
> all Ph
Hi there
For the past few weeks we've experienced a large increase in missed
spam. It's Pharma-related, one sentence plus a link.
The interesting features are:
* every Subject line is different. They're aren't Bayes-busters either -
all Pharma related - but shall we say "innovative" in their us
Ok, so I setup the mysql autowhitelisting db connection info in SA and
then ran the lint test and it appears everything is connecting fine. I
am though seeing any data logged. According to the local.conf,
autowhitelisting is enabled by default. I am using version 3.3.1 and it
is setup with Mai
On 8/16/2010 7:00 AM, Mynabbler wrote:
> I think everybody and their dog made a ruleset regarding 'your email address
> has won'. Something like:
>
> MN_YEAHRIGHT /\bYour (?:email|e-mail) (?:address|account) (?:has won|just
> won you)\b/
>
> How do you make the second argument optional? So it also
On 8/14/2010 5:51 PM, mouss wrote:
> Le 12/08/2010 00:37, Karsten Bräckelmann a écrit :
>> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:30 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>> In case anyone else is following this...
>>>
>>> The sa-update process made things a bit more complex than simply
>>> renaming the file after updat
On 8/13/2010 8:47 PM, nonlin wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Thank you all for your assistance.
>
> After all the fuss I have been making, I forgot the one rule that I
> have learned from dealing with electrics, "always check your equipment
> before you use it!". since I was the admin I use outlook exp
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Mynabbler wrote:
I think everybody and their dog made a ruleset regarding 'your email
address has won'. Something like:
MN_YEAHRIGHT /\bYour (?:email|e-mail) (?:address|account) (?:has won|just
won you)\b/
I've done lots. Take a look in my sandbox.
How do you make the
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 18:35 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> Short of a custom plugin you'd probably be looking at a tool to extract
> external email addresses from your outbound log and create a whitelist .cf
> file that SA reads, and you'd periodically run this tool and then restart
> SA.
>
I have
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 04:00 -0700, Mynabbler wrote:
> I think everybody and their dog made a ruleset regarding 'your email address
> has won'. Something like:
>
>
> How do you make the second argument optional? So it also hits 'your email
> has won'?
>
One way is to use a meta:
body _MN_YR1
On 8/16/10 6:00 AM, "Mynabbler" wrote:
>
> I think everybody and their dog made a ruleset regarding 'your email address
> has won'. Something like:
>
> MN_YEAHRIGHT /\bYour (?:email|e-mail) (?:address|account) (?:has won|just
> won you)\b/
>
> How do you make the second argument optional? So i
radio-hk:/etc/mail/spamassassin # sudo -u chose spamassassin --lint -c
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
Aug 16 13:00:05.859 [4857] warn: netset: cannot include
200.200.200.0/24 as it has already been included
Aug 16 13:00:05.868 [4857] warn: netset: cannot include
200.200.200.0/24 as it has al
I think everybody and their dog made a ruleset regarding 'your email address
has won'. Something like:
MN_YEAHRIGHT /\bYour (?:email|e-mail) (?:address|account) (?:has won|just
won you)\b/
How do you make the second argument optional? So it also hits 'your email
has won'?
--
View this message i
Off hand I don't see a problem. What does "spamassassin --lint" say as a
user (not as root?) It's almost as if your whitelist rules are not being
parsed because of an error in the file above the whitelist rules.
If lint passes I'd use "spamassassin -t -D - Original Message -
From: "Josef
29 matches
Mail list logo
