Dear friends,
I don't mean to be condescending but it look like no one is really reading
my posts.
I had run sa-update, /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004 owner is root and I ran
sa-update as root. and it looked like it updated. and I just ran it again
now as per these latest instructions, rebooted t
On 8/12/2010 4:40 PM, nonlin wrote:
> Thanks Bowie,
>
> I ran it, and it seemed to update, though it gave me no info as it did, + it
> did restart the service. But this has still not fixed my problem.
> I really don't think we will be on the right track until someone tell me to
> start posting som
Thanks Bowie,
I ran it, and it seemed to update, though it gave me no info as it did, + it
did restart the service. But this has still not fixed my problem.
I really don't think we will be on the right track until someone tell me to
start posting some of my configuration file. I would have dun it
On 8/12/2010 11:41 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> On 8/11/2010 6:15 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>>> The problem is, that not only the sub-rules change, but with them the
>>> actually scored meta rules, combining these sub-rules by OR-ing them.
>>>
>>> That means, stale meta rules in stoc
> On 8/11/2010 6:15 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > The problem is, that not only the sub-rules change, but with them the
> > actually scored meta rules, combining these sub-rules by OR-ing them.
> >
> > That means, stale meta rules in stock will override the fresh meta
> > rules, effectively d
> I've yet to hear anyone implementing SA for forms in a sensible manner..
Thanks for the feedback. If people have tried before it's unlikely
I'll do much better :)
> It would make much more sense to me to just apply well known form spam
> specific checks into your code. The standard captcha, to
On 8/12/2010 8:49 AM, Tim Thorburn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've run into an issue with a mailbox where large amounts of spam are
> making their way through filters. The majority of these spam messages
> receive SA scores of 0.3-1.6; for obvious reasons I cannot adjust the
> filter sensitivity this ag
On 8/11/2010 10:32 PM, nonlin wrote:
> Well I am not out of the Dog House yet.
>
> So, by some miracle I was able to get yum to work and was able to use it to
> update Spamassassion. I was so happy because this was the safest way to do
> this. But yum didn't have ver 3.3 available so I was able to
On 8/11/2010 6:15 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
> The problem is, that not only the sub-rules change, but with them the
> actually scored meta rules, combining these sub-rules by OR-ing them.
>
> That means, stale meta rules in stock will override the fresh meta
> rules, effectively discarding
On 8/11/2010 7:15 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>> In case anyone else is following this...
>>
>> The sa-update process made things a bit more complex than simply
>> renaming the file after updates. If that's all you do, then
>> sa-update loses track of the f
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:49:00 -0400
Tim Thorburn wrote:
> The command I am
> using is: sa-learn --spam /path/to/file This file currently has 153
> spam messages;
if the file is a mailbox file you need to specify the format e.g. --mbox
> however when the above command is run I receive the
>
Hello,
I've run into an issue with a mailbox where large amounts of spam are
making their way through filters. The majority of these spam messages
receive SA scores of 0.3-1.6; for obvious reasons I cannot adjust the
filter sensitivity this aggressively. After reading through the docs
I've
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:51:19 -0400
Matt Kettler wrote:
> On 8/11/2010 1:30 PM, RW wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:48:11 -0400
> > Matt Kettler wrote:
> >
> >> 1) lack of expiry process causes unbounded database growth.
> >> There's a script to clean out single-hit entries, but multi-hit
> >>
On 11.08.10 13:52, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> We are currently running SA v3.3.1 on Solaris 9 and Solaris 10 and are
> planning to move to Red Hat. I don't have much experience with Red Hat
> (or Linux in general). Could you point me to some tips and documentation
> about installing and running
14 matches
Mail list logo
