Re: sa-compile has no effect (under Windows.......)

2010-07-30 Thread Henrik K
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:56:08PM +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 15:35 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > On 7/30/2010 3:26 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > > On 7/30/2010 3:08 PM, Emin Akbulut wrote: > > >> Simply disable regular ruleset and test again. If it takes 6.93-5.78 > > >>

Re: How to run only certain tests?

2010-07-30 Thread RW
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:40:45 -0700 (PDT) John Hardin wrote: > On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, RW wrote: > > > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:06:43 -0700 (PDT) > > John Hardin wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote: > >> > >>> service spamd start > >>> - run your stuff > >>> service spamd stop > >

Re: How to run only certain tests?

2010-07-30 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, RW wrote: On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:06:43 -0700 (PDT) John Hardin wrote: On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote: service spamd start - run your stuff service spamd stop I don't think the OP wants to mess around with the global system services, so it's not _quite_ that s

Re: How to run only certain tests?

2010-07-30 Thread RW
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:05:04 -0400 Adam Moskowitz wrote: > > > Except that I pretty clearly stated I didn't want to use spamd. >> > > But you gave the reason that it's too complicated, and I was > > pointing out that it's trivial to do. > > You answered a question I didn't ask, even after I spe

Re: How to run only certain tests?

2010-07-30 Thread RW
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:06:43 -0700 (PDT) John Hardin wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > > service spamd start > > - run your stuff > > service spamd stop > > I don't think the OP want's to mess around with the global system > services, so it's not _quite_ that simple... Act

Re: sa-compile has no effect (under Windows.......)

2010-07-30 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 15:35 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote: > On 7/30/2010 3:26 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > On 7/30/2010 3:08 PM, Emin Akbulut wrote: > >> Simply disable regular ruleset and test again. If it takes 6.93-5.78 > >> seconds or > >> something similar, you are right. > > I'm actually having

Re: sa-compile has no effect (under Windows.......)

2010-07-30 Thread Yet Another Ninja
On 2010-07-30 21:26, Bowie Bailey wrote: On 7/30/2010 3:08 PM, Emin Akbulut wrote: Simply disable regular ruleset and test again. If it takes 6.93-5.78 seconds or something similar, you are right. I'm actually having the same issue on my new home server. I set up SA and got it working. Then

Re: How to run only certain tests?

2010-07-30 Thread RW
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:54:40 -0400 Adam Moskowitz wrote: > In the spirit of sharing what I've learned . . . > > My question boiled down to this: > > Can I arrange to load/run only the tests I need? If so, how? > > The answer is actually quite simple: > > 1) Create a private rules directory

Re: How to run only certain tests?

2010-07-30 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote: service spamd start - run your stuff service spamd stop I don't think the OP want's to mess around with the global system services, so it's not _quite_ that simple... -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@

Re: sa-compile has no effect (under Windows.......)

2010-07-30 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 7/30/2010 3:26 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > On 7/30/2010 3:08 PM, Emin Akbulut wrote: >> Simply disable regular ruleset and test again. If it takes 6.93-5.78 >> seconds or >> something similar, you are right. > I'm actually having the same issue on my new home server. I set up SA > and got it wo

Re: sa-compile has no effect (under Windows.......)

2010-07-30 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 7/30/2010 3:08 PM, Emin Akbulut wrote: > Simply disable regular ruleset and test again. If it takes 6.93-5.78 > seconds or > something similar, you are right. I'm actually having the same issue on my new home server. I set up SA and got it working. Then I ran sa-compile, enabled the plugin i

Re: sa-compile has no effect (under Windows.......)

2010-07-30 Thread Emin Akbulut
Simply disable regular ruleset and test again. If it takes 6.93-5.78 seconds or something similar, you are right. On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Lemke wrote: > > Another Windows related question > > I (think I) successfully compiled my ruleset into native code. I used a XP > box wit

Re: How to run only certain tests?

2010-07-30 Thread Adam Moskowitz
In the spirit of sharing what I've learned . . . My question boiled down to this: > Can I arrange to load/run only the tests I need? If so, how? The answer is actually quite simple: 1) Create a private rules directory, say, $HOME/sa-rules 2) Copy the following files from /usr/share/spam

Re: How to run only certain tests?

2010-07-30 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:57 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote: > On 7/30/2010 12:14 PM, Adam Moskowitz wrote: > > 3) While I could fire up a non-standard spamd, throw messages at it, > > then close it down when I'm done, I'd rather not add the complication of > > managing the start-up/shut-down of a daemon

Re: How to run only certain tests?

2010-07-30 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 7/30/2010 12:14 PM, Adam Moskowitz wrote: > Earlier today, I wrote: >> I want to use spamassassin's per-user whitelisting as part of some mail >> processing I'm doing. >> . . . >> spamassassin takes a long time to load and run >> . . . >> Can I arrange to load/run only the tests I need? If so,

Re: How to run only certain tests?

2010-07-30 Thread Adam Moskowitz
Earlier today, I wrote: > I want to use spamassassin's per-user whitelisting as part of some mail > processing I'm doing. > . . . > spamassassin takes a long time to load and run > . . . > Can I arrange to load/run only the tests I need? If so, how? Sorry, I should have made a few things clear: 1

Re: How to run only certain tests?

2010-07-30 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 7/30/2010 10:58 AM, Adam Moskowitz wrote: > Background: SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 running on Perl version 5.8.8 on > CentOS release 5.2 (Final) -- all set up for me by my sysadmin. Everything > works fine when using all the defaults. However . . . > > I want to use spamassassin's per-user whit

Re: How to run only certain tests?

2010-07-30 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Moskowitz wrote: I want to use spamassassin's per-user whitelisting as part of some mail processing I'm doing. I'm dealing with a lot of messages (potentially over 100,000), but doing it one-at-a-time (and I can't easily change that). spamassassin takes a long time to

Re: How to run only certain tests?

2010-07-30 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 7/30/10 10:58 AM, Adam Moskowitz wrote: Background: SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 running on Perl version 5.8.8 on CentOS release 5.2 (Final) -- all set up for me by my sysadmin. Everything works fine when using all the defaults. However . . . this should get your started. need to write a p

How to run only certain tests?

2010-07-30 Thread Adam Moskowitz
Background: SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 running on Perl version 5.8.8 on CentOS release 5.2 (Final) -- all set up for me by my sysadmin. Everything works fine when using all the defaults. However . . . I want to use spamassassin's per-user whitelisting as part of some mail processing I'm doing. I'm

Re: Trouble whitelisting domain users with whitelist_from_rcvd

2010-07-30 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > afaik whitelist_* is applied on mail sent from remote hosts. I am not sure > > if it hits on internal_netowrks or trusted_networks boundary (i guess it's > > the former) but this mail never crossed the internal network boundary, do > > any blacklist or whitelist

Re: Hotmail false positives through the roof since 3.3.1 update.

2010-07-30 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 7/29/10 8:44 PM, Ray Dzek wrote: Hi all, I updated to 3.3.1 last week. The capture rate went way up, which is good, but… I am now getting complaints that “legit” Hotmail is getting tagged pretty much for every email coming in. set the freemail scores to 0 What would be the recommended wa

sa-compile has no effect (under Windows.......)

2010-07-30 Thread Daniel Lemke
Another Windows related question I (think I) successfully compiled my ruleset into native code. I used a XP box with Visual C++ 6, re2c-0.13.5 and SpamAssassin 3.3.1. sa-compile ran through but reported an error excuting the makefile. The prefix parameter, MakeMaker used to create the Makefi