Great!
1 down, 19,587,294,872,875 more admins to go! ;-)
Ted
On 7/15/2010 5:55 PM, Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
Hi all,
Few months ago I asked this list if using SA on outgoing smtp was a good
idea (Thread: SA on outgoing SMTP).
This thread quickly moved to "Block direct port 25 for non-mta
and that ip is listed on 12 blacklists. my point exactly.
you wanted to know how to block them? use the blacklists.
On 7/15/10 9:14 PM, Peter Lowish wrote:
From my mailwatch report
186.4.15.18 (Reverse Lookup Failed) (GeoIP Lookup Failed)
ID: 1OYnOW-00019S-8I
Message Heade
On 7/15/10 9:04 PM, Peter Lowish wrote:
I am wondering if someone has a rule to deal with the current spam
being sent with just a small png attachment the name of which changes
There is no text in the email, just the attachment – the subject line
is always different
reputation lists, rbl's
I am wondering if someone has a rule to deal with the current spam being
sent with just a small png attachment the name of which changes
There is no text in the email, just the attachment - the subject line is
always different
Thanks
Peter
Hi all,
Few months ago I asked this list if using SA on outgoing smtp was a good
idea (Thread: SA on outgoing SMTP).
This thread quickly moved to "Block direct port 25 for non-mta users!
I was really afraid of doing so and didn't really wanted to go this
way.
now about 6 months later I have to s
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, Emin Akbulut wrote:
spamassassin.exe always calculates the same/correct score.
Good... Goood.
pamd second run reports only a few tests. Is it OK? I mean spamd runs
all test but only adds which one increases score to it's report? Or
these tests are processed tests lis
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 07:17 -0700, Gnanam wrote:
> You're right, it was not started. I now started using the command:
> # spamd -d
>
> Then I ran "netstat -tulpn |grep spamd", it returned:
> tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:783 0.0.0.0:*
> LISTEN 17382/spamd -d
>
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 17:21 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> > Also, how do I print only "Content analysis details" from "spamassassin"
> > command-line tool by suppressing the whole mail message from being printed?
> > Is there any option that controls this?
>
> Not possible as far as I know. Sp
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 07:02 -0700, Daniel Lemke wrote:
>> > Thanks for making me understand this important and critical difference.
>> > But why then spamassassin script should exist - just for my
>> understanding?
>>
>> Like already mentioned, Spamd needs a lo
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 07:02 -0700, Daniel Lemke wrote:
> > Thanks for making me understand this important and critical difference.
> > But why then spamassassin script should exist - just for my understanding?
>
> Like already mentioned, Spamd needs a lot of memory and runs as a Daemon,
> therefo
On 15.7.2010 16:58, Gnanam wrote:
> Also, how do I print only "Content analysis details" from "spamassassin"
> command-line tool by suppressing the whole mail message from being printed?
> Is there any option that controls this?
Not possible as far as I know. SpamAssassin's idea is to be a *filte
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 06:40 -0700, Gnanam wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > No stability concerns with either.
> >
> > However, with anything other than a trivial load, do not use the plain
> > spamassassin script, but the spamd daemon with the light-weight spamc
> > client. The daemon is mu
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 06:58 -0700, Gnanam wrote:
> My problem is, the "spamc" client is not at all working and it is always
> returning "0/0". At the same time, if I use spamassassin script, it's
> working and is giving back spam score result.
That indicates an error. Did you start spamd?
You c
Daniel Lemke wrote:
>
> Did you start the Daemon?
You're right, it was not started. I now started using the command:
# spamd -d
Then I ran "netstat -tulpn |grep spamd", it returned:
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:783 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 17382/spamd -d
Now whe
Gnanam wrote:
>
> My problem is, the "spamc" client is not at all working and it is always
> returning "0/0". At the same time, if I use spamassassin script, it's
> working and is giving back spam score result.
>
Did you start the Daemon?
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
> man spamd
>
--
Gnanam wrote:
>
>
> Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>>
>> No stability concerns with either.
>>
>> However, with anything other than a trivial load, do not use the plain
>> spamassassin script, but the spamd daemon with the light-weight spamc
>> client. The daemon is much faster and consumes les
Hi,
My SpamAssassin setup:
"SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 running on Perl version 5.8.8" installed on "Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5 (Tikanga)"
My problem is, the "spamc" client is not at all working and it is always
returning "0/0". At the same time, if I use spamassassin script, it
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
> No stability concerns with either.
>
> However, with anything other than a trivial load, do not use the plain
> spamassassin script, but the spamd daemon with the light-weight spamc
> client. The daemon is much faster and consumes less resources, because
> SA do
On 15.7.2010 16:09, Gnanam wrote:
>
> Where do I limit/configure the number of child processes that spamd can run?
> Can you provide me documentation link for the same?
> Can you share with me the normal limit imposed by a typical MTA?
>
It depends. If you are using *nix it is dependent on the
spamassassin.exe always calculates the same/correct score.
spamd second run reports only a few tests. Is it OK? I mean
spamd runs all test but only adds which one increases score
to it's report? Or these tests are processed tests list only?
First run has tons of tests, second run has only 5 tests.
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Matt Kettler wrote:
On 7/14/2010 11:27 AM, Emin Akbulut wrote:
I noticed randomly while I was testing SA. All I did is below:
WinSpamC < realspam.txt > result1.txt
NET STOP Spamassassin
NET START Spamassassin
WinSpamC < realspam.txt > result2.txt
WinSpamC < realspam.txt
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 06:09 -0700, Gnanam wrote:
> Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > Its reliable enough, but concurrency will be limited by the number of
> > child processes you allow spamd to run - on normal MTAs this limit is in
> > single or low double figures. To allow 'hundreds' of simultaneous test
Martin Gregorie-2 wrote:
>
> Its reliable enough, but concurrency will be limited by the number of
> child processes you allow spamd to run - on normal MTAs this limit is in
> single or low double figures. To allow 'hundreds' of simultaneous tests
> you'd have to launch a copy of spamassassin as
Ops sorry, I use Gmail, it stacks messages well but when I hit the Reply
the message will send only the last person on thread. I have to modify
To: field : )
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Gnanam wrote:
>
> I'm posting a reply which I received from "Emin Akbulut" here:
>
>
I'm posting a reply which I received from "Emin Akbulut" here:
Testing "hundreds of different email messages at the same time" is a bit
excessive;
ram usage, harddisk I/O bottleneck, etc... In my case if threads are more
than 16
then server may become non-responsive because of virtual memory is
Testing "hundreds of different email messages at the same time" is a bit
excessive;
ram usage, harddisk I/O bottleneck, etc... In my case if threads are more
than 16
then server may become non-responsive because of virtual memory is too
high.
SA is not a cpu hunger application but it uses
quite hig
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 04:31 -0700, Gnanam wrote:
> > I want to integrate SpamAssassin in my web-based application to test spam
> > score of the "email content" that our application User's wish to send in
> > mail composing page itself - even before sending.
> As I'm integrating SpamAssassin comman
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 04:31 -0700, Gnanam wrote:
> As I'm integrating SpamAssassin command-line tool in our web-based
> application to test spam score of the email message, hundreds of application
> Users may perform spam score test at the same time.
>
I'd say suck it and see initially, with your
Hi,
In continuation to my original posting here,
http://old.nabble.com/SpamAssassin-Integration-ts28903365.html
Gnanam wrote:
> I want to integrate SpamAssassin in my web-based application to test spam
> score of the "email content" that our application User's wish to send in
> mail composing p
Ah I understand now why they are treated differently.. I've never delved into
the details of that module.
Blacklisting might be a good idea!
Thanks
Dave
Giampaolo Tomassoni-2 wrote:
>
>> What I am asking is why a reference to http://querty.ru.gg generates a
>> URI
>> lookup for ru.gg (ie mis
LuKreme wrote:
>
> On 15-Jul-2010, at 00:59, Daniel Lemke wrote:
>> You may want to "solve" this by increasing your --max-spare, at least
>> this
>> works for our servers.
>
> Or sneaking in one night and ninja-installing FreeBSD/Linux on all those
> windows boxes…
>
> Not that I'm suggesting
I don't know the default --max-spare value if any and what do you suggest,
Daniel?
Our MTA thread limit is 6.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Daniel Lemke wrote:
>
>
> Emin Akbulut wrote:
> >
> > I also have spamd crash problem, it crashes very often:
> >
> > Application: spamd.exe,
> > version
On 15-Jul-2010, at 00:59, Daniel Lemke wrote:
> You may want to "solve" this by increasing your --max-spare, at least this
> works for our servers.
Or sneaking in one night and ninja-installing FreeBSD/Linux on all those
windows boxes…
Not that I'm suggesting that, of course.
:D
--
Q: Does an
33 matches
Mail list logo
