Re: Rescue spam mail

2010-07-08 Thread David Touzeau
or check http://www.artica.fr that include spamassassin+amavis+end-user mgmt On 08/07/2010 23:28, Benny Pedersen wrote: On tor 08 jul 2010 17:54:30 CEST, Sasa wrote therefore I must use amavisd-new functions for to rescue an spam mail ? google mailzu-ng

Re: Rescue spam mail

2010-07-08 Thread Benny Pedersen
On tor 08 jul 2010 17:54:30 CEST, Sasa wrote therefore I must use amavisd-new functions for to rescue an spam mail ? google mailzu-ng -- xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

Re: Rescue spam mail

2010-07-08 Thread Ned Slider
On 08/07/10 16:44, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 08.07.10 17:11, Sasa wrote: Hi, when arrived SPAM mail in log file I have, ie: Jul 8 16:46:24 mail amavis[32426]: (32426-08) SPAM, -> , Yes, hits=10.22 tag=1 tag2=5 kill=5 tests=AWL=1.163, BAYES_99=3.5, DCC_CHECK=2.17, DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.00

Re: Rescue spam mail

2010-07-08 Thread Sasa
"Matus UHLAR - fantomas" wrote: well, this has completely nothing to do with spamassassin. it's amavis or tyour MTA's issue. Spamassassin is only responsible for checking if the mail is spam, and here amavis plugs between SA and MTA only to call some spamassassin functions. therefore I must u

Re: Rescue spam mail

2010-07-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 08.07.10 17:11, Sasa wrote: > Hi, when arrived SPAM mail in log file I have, ie: > > Jul 8 16:46:24 mail amavis[32426]: (32426-08) SPAM, > -> , Yes, hits=10.22 > tag=1 tag2=5 kill=5 tests=AWL=1.163, BAYES_99=3.5, DCC_CHECK=2.17, > DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001, HS_INDEX_PARAM=0.001, HTML_FONT_FA

Rescue spam mail

2010-07-08 Thread Sasa
Hi, when arrived SPAM mail in log file I have, ie: Jul 8 16:46:24 mail amavis[32426]: (32426-08) SPAM, -> , Yes, hits=10.22 tag=1 tag2=5 kill=5 tests=AWL=1.163, BAYES_99=3.5, DCC_CHECK=2.17, DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001, HS_INDEX_PARAM=0.001, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RAZOR2_CF

Re: Flagged as spam but accepted

2010-07-08 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 7/8/2010 10:52 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: > 2010-07-08 09:05:01 1OWqmi-0005N3-JU /*SA: Action: flagged as Spam but > accepted: score=4.0 required=4.0 */(scanned in 0/0 secs | Message-Id: > 20100708130436.52c7d1cb1...@mail.microton.com.br). From > (host=NULL [189.26.124.122]) for a...@plexicomm.ne

Flagged as spam but accepted

2010-07-08 Thread Adam Moffett
2010-07-08 09:05:01 1OWqmi-0005N3-JU /*SA: Action: flagged as Spam but accepted: score=4.0 required=4.0 */(scanned in 0/0 secs | Message-Id: 20100708130436.52c7d1cb1...@mail.microton.com.br). From (host=NULL [189.26.124.122]) for a...@plexicomm.net The above is a line from my Exim log file.

Re: SA checking of authenticated users' messages

2010-07-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
>>> > > (spamass-milter doesn't tell SA about auth) ==> [ >>> > > rbl checks run against authenticated user's IP address >>> > > lack of ALL_TRUSTED for authenticated user's mail >>> > That last one seems to be my problem. Does the patch fix this? I'll >>> > try updating

Re: SA checking of authenticated users' messages

2010-07-08 Thread Charles Gregory
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, Louis Guillaume wrote: > > (spamass-milter doesn't tell SA about auth) ==> [ > > rbl checks run against authenticated user's IP address > > lack of ALL_TRUSTED for authenticated user's mail > That last one seems to be my problem. Does the patch fix th

Re: upgrade 3.2.1 to 3.2.5: dcc not working, headers not being added

2010-07-08 Thread Robert S
>> >> I've upgraded from 3.2.1 to 3.2.5 on gentoo.  It appears that dcc is >> >> broken.  My messages no longer get the dcc header: >> > >> > First, did you know that 3.3.1 was released? Otherwise, why stop at 3.2.5? > > On 04.07.10 07:24, Robert S wrote: >> 3.3.1 is still marked as "unstable" by g

Re: SA checking of authenticated users' messages

2010-07-08 Thread Greg Troxel
Cedric Knight writes: > On 07/07/10 23:26, Greg Troxel wrote: >> >> Louis Guillaume writes: >>> I just need to clarify one thing that's not clear to me in re-reading >>> our thread from the other day: Is there a work-around for this? >>> >>> My users are getting restless. Everytime their ISP c

Re: How not to implement SPF (nationwide.co.uk)

2010-07-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
>> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:19:43 +0100 >> Ned Slider wrote: >>> so they have no SPF policy? Wrong, they do, but it's on their >>> email.barclays.co.uk subdomain as presumably that's the domain they >>> send mail from - but how are you supposed to know that if they don't >>> tell you? > On 6/30/201

Re: upgrade 3.2.1 to 3.2.5: dcc not working, headers not being added

2010-07-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> >> I've upgraded from 3.2.1 to 3.2.5 on gentoo.  It appears that dcc is > >> broken.  My messages no longer get the dcc header: > > > > First, did you know that 3.3.1 was released? Otherwise, why stop at 3.2.5? On 04.07.10 07:24, Robert S wrote: > 3.3.1 is still marked as "unstable" by gentoo.

Re: SA checking of authenticated users' messages

2010-07-08 Thread Cedric Knight
On 07/07/10 23:26, Greg Troxel wrote: > > Louis Guillaume writes: >> I just need to clarify one thing that's not clear to me in re-reading >> our thread from the other day: Is there a work-around for this? >> >> My users are getting restless. Everytime their ISP changes their IP >> address I have