On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:10:54 -0400
Adam Moffett wrote:
>I know it does auto expire because I have a
> multitude of bayes_toks.expire files ranging from 40-80MB in size.
> Can I tune what gets expired to reduce the size of the db?
Expire it from cron and turn-off autoexpire.
Matt Kettler wrote:
> These settings:
> -m 50 --min-children=10 --min-spare=10
>
> seem a bit high for a box with only 4GB of ram... Is the box suffering
> from severe swap usage, and grinding itself to a halt when all 50 are
> up and running? (try running "free", what does it say?)
It's not th
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Adam Moffett wrote:
> These issues came up when I was trying to address performance problems, I hope
> they aren't major RTFM items.
>
> 1) I used sa-compile as suggested by the FAQ and the CPU load dropped
> *dramatically*. The question is do I have to run that every time I
Hi, I've noticed what seems to be unexpected behaviour with the Freemail
plugin, which I'm hoping someone can shed some light on.
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.2.5, and the "FreeMail.pm" plugin v2.001 from
http://sa.hege.li, along with the rules from the 20_freemail.cf file at the
same location.
On 10.6.2010 19:10, Adam Moffett wrote:
> These issues came up when I was trying to address performance problems,
> I hope they aren't major RTFM items.
>
> 1) I used sa-compile as suggested by the FAQ and the CPU load dropped
> *dramatically*. The question is do I have to run that every time I
>
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Matt Kettler wrote:
On 6/9/2010 12:11 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 8-Jun-2010, at 19:34, Matt Kettler wrote:
Legacy version, 3.2.5 (rarely updated)
Even better:
Unsupported version 3.2.5 (critical updates only)
or
Deprecated version: 3.2.5 (critical updates only, if at all)
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Spiro Harvey wrote:
I'm just wondering if it's possible to decrease the scan times. In the
TOTALS section AvgTm is the average "scantime" in the spamassassin log
file:
(Delivered are messages that SA scores under 5, Spamboxed are scored 5+,
but under 10, and Rejected are
These issues came up when I was trying to address performance problems,
I hope they aren't major RTFM items.
1) I used sa-compile as suggested by the FAQ and the CPU load dropped
*dramatically*. The question is do I have to run that every time I
sa-update or will it happen automatically?
2)
Louis Guillaume writes:
>> I think what is supposed to happen is
>>
>>spamass-milter gets milter macros
>>
>>spamass-milter makes a synthetic Received: line that is *not* in the
>>message as received. This proxies for the Received: line that the
>>MTAe would add. The synthetic
Frank,
Thanks for the reply.
Can you tell me what all kind of attachment scanning spamassassin does.
Can you point me to some good reference that can give me a good idea about
attachment scanning et all.
Thanks
Ashish Sharma
-Original Message-
From: Frank Heydlauf [mailto:fh-sa2...@l
On 6/10/10 8:13 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
Louis Guillaume writes:
On 6/9/10 7:40 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 01:51 -0400, Louis Guillaume wrote:
Recently I've had a lot of reports of returned mail from authenticated
users. The messages are being bounced on the way out.
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 01:37:05PM +, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
>
> Since by default spamassassin and it's default plugins do not check email
> attachments for spam, are there custom plugins available for scanning
> attachments for spam?
why do you think so?
> Do I really need email attac
Martin,
Thanks for the advice but I am already doing what you have suggested.
Thanks
Ashish Sharma
-Original Message-
From: Martin Gregorie [mailto:mar...@gregorie.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 7:20 PM
To: Sharma, Ashish
Subject: Re: Scanning attachments with spamassassin
On Thu,
Hi,
I am a newbie in this.
I have configured spamassassin for my postfix server invoked via amavisd. (I
used the link: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd)
Here my question is:
Since by default spamassassin and it's default plugins do not check email
attachments for spam, are there custom p
Per Jessen wrote:
> I have a bit of SA code where I strip leading and trailing whitespace -
>
> foreach (@addrs) { s/^\s*([^\s]+)\s*$/\1/; }
>
> Whenever I run this I get the warning "\1 better written as $1" which I
> understand to be perl telling me that the right side of s/// should use
> $digi
Ned Slider wrote:
> On 06/10/2010 10:45 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> On 09.06.10 10:10, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>> I was looking at the hits on a drug spam and I noticed these two:
>>>
>>> * 1.1 NO_PRESCRIPTION BODY: No prescription needed
>>> * 1.5 FB_NO_SCRIP_NEEDED BODY: Phrase: no prescrip
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Per,
>
>> >> There are no spaces in the string, it's an email address.
>
> An email address can legitimately contain a space, see RFC 2822,
> e.g.
> "some x user"@example.com
Yeah I know, but I'm quietly ignoring that possibility. I haven't seen
one the last four-five
Per,
> >> There are no spaces in the string, it's an email address.
An email address can legitimately contain a space, see RFC 2822,
e.g.
"some x user"@example.com
> >> I did try using $1 on the right side of the s///, but it didn't work.
Most weird. Which version of perl?
Try this:
$ perl
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 03:08 -0400, Louis Guillaume wrote:
> On 6/9/10 7:40 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > Recently I've had a lot of reports of returned mail from authenticated
> > > users. The messages are being bounced on the way out.
> >
> > You forgot to provide the reason (SA rules hit
Louis Guillaume writes:
> On 6/9/10 7:40 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 01:51 -0400, Louis Guillaume wrote:
>>> Recently I've had a lot of reports of returned mail from authenticated
>>> users. The messages are being bounced on the way out.
>>
>> You forgot to provide th
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 12:08 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
>> > > I have a bit of SA code where I strip leading and trailing
>> > > whitespace
>> > >
>> > > foreach (@addrs) { s/^\s*([^\s]+)\s*$/\1/; }
>> > >
>> > > Whenever I run this I get the warning "\1 better writte
On 6/9/2010 7:51 PM, Spiro Harvey wrote:
> I maintain a mail cluster that gets about 70,000 messages a day per
> node.
>
> I'm just wondering if it's possible to decrease the scan times. In the
> TOTALS section AvgTm is the average "scantime" in the spamassassin log
> file:
>
> (Delivered are messa
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 12:08 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> > > I have a bit of SA code where I strip leading and trailing whitespace
> > >
> > > foreach (@addrs) { s/^\s*([^\s]+)\s*$/\1/; }
> > >
> > > Whenever I run this I get the warning "\1 better written as $1" which
> > > I understand to be pe
On 06/10/2010 10:45 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 09.06.10 10:10, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I was looking at the hits on a drug spam and I noticed these two:
* 1.1 NO_PRESCRIPTION BODY: No prescription needed
* 1.5 FB_NO_SCRIP_NEEDED BODY: Phrase: no prescription needed.
The rules themselves
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Per,
>
>> I have a bit of SA code where I strip leading and trailing whitespace
>> -
>> foreach (@addrs) { s/^\s*([^\s]+)\s*$/\1/; }
>> Whenever I run this I get the warning "\1 better written as $1" which
>> I understand to be perl telling me that the right side of s///
On 09.06.10 10:10, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I was looking at the hits on a drug spam and I noticed these two:
>
> * 1.1 NO_PRESCRIPTION BODY: No prescription needed
> * 1.5 FB_NO_SCRIP_NEEDED BODY: Phrase: no prescription needed.
>
> The rules themselves are very similar. Should these two be combin
Per,
> I have a bit of SA code where I strip leading and trailing whitespace -
> foreach (@addrs) { s/^\s*([^\s]+)\s*$/\1/; }
> Whenever I run this I get the warning "\1 better written as $1" which I
> understand to be perl telling me that the right side of s/// should use
> $digit, not \digit.
On 09.06.10 10:10, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I was looking at the hits on a drug spam and I noticed these two:
>
> * 1.1 NO_PRESCRIPTION BODY: No prescription needed
> * 1.5 FB_NO_SCRIP_NEEDED BODY: Phrase: no prescription needed.
>
> The rules themselves are very similar. Should these two be combin
On 06/10/2010 08:36 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
I have a bit of SA code where I strip leading and trailing whitespace -
foreach (@addrs) { s/^\s*([^\s]+)\s*$/\1/; }
Whenever I run this I get the warning "\1 better written as $1" which I
understand to be perl telling me that the right side of s/// sho
On 6/9/10 7:40 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 01:51 -0400, Louis Guillaume wrote:
Recently I've had a lot of reports of returned mail from authenticated
users. The messages are being bounced on the way out.
You forgot to provide the reason (SA rules hit) for the messages
30 matches
Mail list logo
