Re: POPAuth and SA 3.3.1?

Per Jessen wrote: > Robert Mangiafico wrote: > >> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Per Jessen wrote: >>> >>> I googled a bit, and found the following: >>> Pseudo-hashes have been removed from Perl, afaict as of 5.1.0.  It's >>> really perl that is complaining, not spamassassin. I don't use >>> p

Re: POPAuth and SA 3.3.1?

Robert Mangiafico wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Per Jessen wrote: >> >> I googled a bit, and found the following: >> Pseudo-hashes have been removed from Perl, afaict as of 5.1.0.  It's >> really perl that is complaining, not spamassassin. I don't use >> popauth myself and I'm not muc

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

Hi > > If there are multiple exchange backends for postfix/spamasassin > > gateway ... how could one validate that users exists, given that you > > only have a list of valid users for some of the exchange servers and > > the mailahead/milterahead/smtp are not an option? As every Exchange requires

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 17:37 -0500, Andy Dorman wrote: > On 05/19/2010 04:26 PM, Karsten � wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 23:13 +0200, Mikael Syska wrote: > >> Not to highjack the thread, but there are also other things to consider. > >> > >> I have no idea how on Postfix, but this could help you

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5/19/10 9:12 PM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > > >> The only real problem, validating recipients at the front MX, based >> on the data in the backend Exchange servers. > > I think it would be easier to just accept only emails for your > domain(s) a

RE: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

>The only real problem, validating recipients at the front MX, based on >the data in the backend Exchange servers. I think it would be easier to just accept only emails for your domain(s) at your mta (postfix or exim), then enable the antispam filter on exchange and configure it drop (not

RE: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

> Can anybody point me in the diretion of a document or place where I could find information about setting up a >solo Linux Debian server running spamassassin as a gateway spam filter that sends the mail along to an exchange server? I have that exact setup , but I have it running on Freeb

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5/19/10 4:13 PM, Mikael Syska wrote: > If there are multiple exchange backends for postfix/spamasassin > gateway ... how could one validate that users exists, given that you > only have a list of valid users for some of the exchange servers and

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 15:14, Kaleb Hosie wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Not to highjack the thread, but there are also other things to consider. >> >> I have no idea how on Postfix, but this could help you too Scott Lavoie. >> >> If there are multiple exchange backends for postfix/spamasassin >> gateway ..

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:56, Scott Lavoie wrote: > Can anybody point me in the direction of a document or place where I could > find information about setting up a solo Linux Debian server running > spamassassin as a gateway spam filter that sends the mail along to an > exchange server? For get

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

On Wed, 19 May 2010, Mikael Syska wrote: > Hi, > > Not to highjack the thread, but there are also other things to consider. > > I have no idea how on Postfix, but this could help you too Scott Lavoie. > > If there are multiple exchange backends for postfix/spamasassin > gateway ... how could one v

SPAMD - SA 3.3.1 - on Windows 2003 SBS

Hello @ all, i have some problems with the config of spamd on Windows 2003 SBS with SpamAssassin 3.3.1. i am start the spamd.bat file an than come back the following output... C:\Perl\bin>spamd Mai 20 00:08:56.592 [5988] info: rules: meta test T_OBFU_ATTACH_MISSP has dependency 'OBFU_TEXT_A

Re: Mail Delivery Failure

On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 08:25 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > On 5/19/2010 6:08 AM, Ned Slider wrote: > > Chris wrote: > >> > >> All my post contained was my scores for the spam sample he posted. Any > >> reason how/why this happened? Here's the actual post: > >> > >> http://pastebin.com/gSuHGqXa > >> >

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

On 05/19/2010 04:26 PM, Karsten � wrote: On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 23:13 +0200, Mikael Syska wrote: Not to highjack the thread, but there are also other things to consider. I have no idea how on Postfix, but this could help you too Scott Lavoie. If there are multiple exchange backends for postfix/

RE: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

> Hi, > > Not to highjack the thread, but there are also other things to consider. > > I have no idea how on Postfix, but this could help you too Scott Lavoie. > > If there are multiple exchange backends for postfix/spamasassin > gateway ... how could one validate that users exists, given that you

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

On 2010-05-19 23:57, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: What I can do, however, is to split up the original question into manageable chunks, as unrelated as possible. SA and postfix on Debian? I can highly recommend: FuGlu http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/fuglu/

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

On Wed, 19 May 2010, Mikael Syska wrote: > Hi, > > Not to highjack the thread, but there are also other things to consider. > > I have no idea how on Postfix, but this could help you too Scott Lavoie. > > If there are multiple exchange backends for postfix/spamasassin > gateway ... how could one v

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 23:39 +0200, Yet Another Ninja wrote: > On 2010-05-19 23:26, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > The only real problem, validating recipients at the front MX, based on > > the data in the backend Exchange servers. Everything else is not a > > problem, even though managing a Linux s

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 23:34 +0200, Mikael Syska wrote: > Yes, we are unfortunately one of the bad guess atm, and I want to > change that ... so hopefully this will give Exchange users and idea > how to fight it, if they are using this kind of setup. Ugh. Well, good you *want* to change it. :) > >

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

On 2010-05-19 23:26, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 23:13 +0200, Mikael Syska wrote: Not to highjack the thread, but there are also other things to consider. I have no idea how on Postfix, but this could help you too Scott Lavoie. If there are multiple exchange backends for p

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

Hi, Yes, we are unfortunately one of the bad guess atm, and I want to change that ... so hopefully this will give Exchange users and idea how to fight it, if they are using this kind of setup. 2010/5/19 Karsten Bräckelmann : > On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 23:13 +0200, Mikael Syska wrote: >> Not to highj

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 23:13 +0200, Mikael Syska wrote: > Not to highjack the thread, but there are also other things to consider. > > I have no idea how on Postfix, but this could help you too Scott Lavoie. > > If there are multiple exchange backends for postfix/spamasassin > gateway ... how coul

RE: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

> > Can anybody point me in the direction of a document or place where I > > could find information about setting up a solo Linux Debian server > > running spamassassin as a gateway spam filter that sends the mail > > along to an exchange server? > > This can be confusing to those that have never

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

Hi, Not to highjack the thread, but there are also other things to consider. I have no idea how on Postfix, but this could help you too Scott Lavoie. If there are multiple exchange backends for postfix/spamasassin gateway ... how could one validate that users exists, given that you only have a l

RE: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

> Can anybody point me in the direction of a document or place where I could find information about setting up a >solo Linux Debian server running spamassassin as a gateway spam filter that sends the mail along to an exchange server? This can be confusing to those that have never done this

Re: Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

On 5/19/10 3:56 PM, Scott Lavoie wrote: Can anybody point me in the direction of a document or place where I could find information about setting up a solo Linux Debian server running spamassassin as a gateway spam filter that sends the mail along to an exchange server?

Spamassasin as a gateway filter for Exchange

Can anybody point me in the direction of a document or place where I could find information about setting up a solo Linux Debian server running spamassassin as a gateway spam filter that sends the mail along to an exchange server? Scott Lavoie Owner Mars Computer, LLC 99 Center ST. Bangor,

Re: POPAuth and SA 3.3.1?

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Per Jessen wrote: > Robert Mangiafico wrote: > >> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Robert Mangiafico >> wrote: >>> Is SA 3.3.1 no longer compatible with POPAuth? After upgrading, we're >>> seeing these errors in the logs: >>> >>> spamd[29369]: Pseudo-hashes are de

Re: confirm unsubscribe from users@spamassassin.apache.org

    John Games | jga...@sitp.net SITP Inc Cell:    806.281.2386 Office: 806.771.2300>>> On 5/19/2010 at 12:48 PM, wrote: Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing theusers@spamassassin.apache.org mailing list.To confirm that you would like   jga...@sitp.netremoved from the users mailing

unsubscribe

Spam With Cut off Subjects

I've noticed a lot of spam coming in recently with cut of subjects and the message within an rtf, pdf or zip file. I'm starting to believe that Bayes isn't able to catch these (however that hasn't stopped me from trying to train it anyways) Here are a few examples of subject lines we have got: "

Re: Mail Delivery Failure

On 5/19/2010 6:08 AM, Ned Slider wrote: > Chris wrote: >> >> All my post contained was my scores for the spam sample he posted. Any >> reason how/why this happened? Here's the actual post: >> >> http://pastebin.com/gSuHGqXa >> > > > The scores also contain URIs that were matched against URIBLs so a

Re: Mail Delivery Failure

Chris wrote: All my post contained was my scores for the spam sample he posted. Any reason how/why this happened? Here's the actual post: http://pastebin.com/gSuHGqXa The scores also contain URIs that were matched against URIBLs so any email containing them will hit again as the "spammy" U