> not happy about losing bayes yet maybe it is time to migrate to SQL
>
> im guessing that SA SQL setup is easy ???
>
> anyone care to chime in?
I'm also interested in this, so thought I would follow up. Can anyone
provide any insight into how difficult it would be to convert from a
local berkeley
Mark Martinec writes:
>> More new errors that I am getting from an upgrade to spamassassin 3.3:
>
> 3.3.0 ?
Good question... indeed the version is 3.3.0.
>> Use of uninitialized value $start_time in addition (+) at
>> /usr/sbin/spamd line 1382,
>
> That was fixed in 3.3.1 .
Great, I didn't se
Michael Scheidell writes:
> On 4/12/10 4:55 PM, Micah Anderson wrote:
>> I'm getting a lot of these log entries ever since I've upgraded:
>>
>> Apr 9 22:31:14 spamd2 spamd[2774]: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241
>>
>>
> what version of dcc are you running?
This is version '1.2.74-4' from D
* Alessio Cecchi [20100415 10:23]:
>
> now we are running spamassassin 3.3.0 on debian lenny, package is
> installed from backports.
>
> Nobody knows if it was packaged (.deb) version 3.3.1 for lenny?
>
Version 3.3.1-1 is in Debian testing (as of 2010-04-05), but hasn&
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Royce Williams wrote:
I will also file a bug to suggest updates to the *_networks language
that is in direct contradiction to the advice in other parts of this
thread.
One thing I might add: It seemed to me that at certain points in the
discussion there was confusion as to
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Royce Williams wrote:
>>
>> From the documentation, msa_networks designates those servers that
>> accept only authenticated messages, regardless of type. I'm the new
>> guy on the list, and have some catching up to do with learning how the
>>
Hi,
now we are running spamassassin 3.3.0 on debian lenny, package is
installed from backports.
Nobody knows if it was packaged (.deb) version 3.3.1 for lenny?
Thanks
--
Alessio Cecchi is:
@ ILS -> http://www.linux.it/~alessice/
on LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice
Assistenza Si
Kris Deugau wrote:
Is there a consistent way to match whatever headers might be available
in a returned message?
Anyone? Or am I stuck maintaining duplicate (or worse) sets of rules
with (almost) the same regex for mimeheader, rawbody, ...
I'm a bit surprised rawbody fails; IIRC it use
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Kris Deugau wrote:
I have yet to figure out why people think it's a good idea to relay
mail from your domain host to your ISP account (especially when the two are
different companies)
Do not mistake the following statement for any form of approval :)
To many
