*>>It allows you to adjust the relative priority of spam processing. If SA
is not invoked during SMTP (i.e. not during the interactive >>part of mail
exchange, where the computer on the other end has to wait for it to finish
processing before it can go on to the next >>message it wants to send), th
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 10:24:43 -0800
Royce Williams wrote:
> > Putting the address ranges into internal_networks is what you do if
> > you *don't* have separate MSAs and MX servers. Otherwise you you
> > put the MSAs into msa_networks and internal_networks. Anything that
> > connects to a server in
Whoops - forgot to reply-all; resending with minor modifications.
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 9:10 AM, RW wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 06:18:25 -0800
> Royce Williams wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Henrik K wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 01:45:57PM -0800, Royce Williams wrote:
>> >
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010, Henrik K wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 01:45:57PM -0800, Royce Williams wrote:
What is the optimal configuration (local.cf or other) for an ISP's
MSAs to prevent unauthenticated dynamic-IP customers from triggering
dynamic tests, but still benefiting from general filtering?
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 06:18:25 -0800
Royce Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Henrik K wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 01:45:57PM -0800, Royce Williams wrote:
> >> What is the optimal configuration (local.cf or other) for an ISP's
> >> MSAs to prevent unauthenticated dynamic-IP c
Hi,
>> What is the optimal configuration (local.cf or other) for an ISP's
>> MSAs to prevent unauthenticated dynamic-IP customers from triggering
>> dynamic tests, but still benefiting from general filtering?
>>
>> I was hoping for a magical 'mua_networks' option, which let me
>> enumerate the IP
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Henrik K wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 01:45:57PM -0800, Royce Williams wrote:
>> What is the optimal configuration (local.cf or other) for an ISP's
>> MSAs to prevent unauthenticated dynamic-IP customers from triggering
>> dynamic tests, but still benefiting fr
Hi,
> I’m building a new 3.3.1 SpamAssassin box from scratch, and ran into a small
> problem when I ran —lint:
> $ spamassassin --lint
> Apr 2 11:24:05.923 [22379] warn: plugin: failed to create instance of
> plugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::EmailBL.pm: Bareword
> "Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::E
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 01:45:57PM -0800, Royce Williams wrote:
> What is the optimal configuration (local.cf or other) for an ISP's
> MSAs to prevent unauthenticated dynamic-IP customers from triggering
> dynamic tests, but still benefiting from general filtering?
>
> I was hoping for a magical '
