On 5-Mar-2010, at 11:45, LuKreme wrote:
>
> On 04-Mar-10 21:41, James Smallacombe wrote:
>> I tried to upgrade from SA 3.2.5 to 3.3.0 by installing the newer one
>> from FreeBSD Ports.
>
> Really? I just did a update of the port tree and yet
>
> $ portversion p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
> p5-Mail-SpamA
On 05-Mar-10 12:27, RW wrote:
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:45:57 -0700
LuKreme wrote:
On 04-Mar-10 21:41, James Smallacombe wrote:
I tried to upgrade from SA 3.2.5 to 3.3.0 by installing the newer
one from FreeBSD Ports.
system SA has not updated in ports to 3.3.0 yet
It's been in ports for
On 05-Mar-10 12:03, James Smallacombe wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, LuKreme wrote:
On 04-Mar-10 21:41, James Smallacombe wrote:
I tried to upgrade from SA 3.2.5 to 3.3.0 by installing the newer one
from FreeBSD Ports.
Really? I just did a update of the port tree and yet
$ portversion p5-Mail-S
Hi,
> As Kai said, check your Bayes is actually working. I've been seeing dozens
> of these daily for what seems like ages, and Bayes now has no trouble
> nailing them although it understandably missed them when they first started
> arriving.
If I try to learn the same message again, sa-learn say
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:39:25 +0100
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Alex wrote on Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:02:35 -0500:
>
> > I've trained probably 50 of these, yet they still have BAYES_50.
>
> I trained your example and it went from 50 to 99. With *1* message!
> There may be something wrong with your Bayes. W
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 09:24 +0100, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote:
> I have a curios message in my Spamassassin-Logfile since at least
> three days:
>
> Fri Mar 5 08:08:11 2010 [4958] info: rules: meta test EASY_URL has
> dependency 'SPOOF_NET2COM' with a zero score
> Fri Mar 5 08:08:11 2010 [495
On 2010-03-05 14:51, Henrik K wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:02:35AM -0500, Alex wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having trouble with an elusive spam for the past few days with
just "re" in the subject. It looks to be routed through hotmail.com,
but doesn't have an SPF signature, so I don't really underst
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:02:35AM -0500, Alex wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having trouble with an elusive spam for the past few days with
> just "re" in the subject. It looks to be routed through hotmail.com,
> but doesn't have an SPF signature, so I don't really understand.
> Here's an example:
>
>
Justin Mason wrote:
>
> Anyone care to craft a response? I think we should. bonus points for
> including the obligatory comp.risks tagline
>
I submitted a reply right after the RISKS Digest issue came out. The issue
after that indicated that there was a backlog of submissions to RISKS, so
ma
Alex wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having trouble with an elusive spam for the past few days with
just "re" in the subject. It looks to be routed through hotmail.com,
but doesn't have an SPF signature, so I don't really understand.
SPF doesn't sign anything (perhaps you are thinking of dkim), and
anyway
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:45:57 -0700
LuKreme wrote:
> On 04-Mar-10 21:41, James Smallacombe wrote:
> > I tried to upgrade from SA 3.2.5 to 3.3.0 by installing the newer
> > one from FreeBSD Ports.
>
> system SA has not updated in ports to 3.3.0 yet
It's been in ports for about a month.
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, LuKreme wrote:
On 04-Mar-10 21:41, James Smallacombe wrote:
I tried to upgrade from SA 3.2.5 to 3.3.0 by installing the newer one
from FreeBSD Ports.
Really? I just did a update of the port tree and yet
$ portversion p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin=
$ wh
Quoting LuKreme :
On 04-Mar-10 21:41, James Smallacombe wrote:
I tried to upgrade from SA 3.2.5 to 3.3.0 by installing the newer one
from FreeBSD Ports.
Really? I just did a update of the port tree and yet
$ portversion p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin=
$ where SpamAssassi
On 04-Mar-10 21:41, James Smallacombe wrote:
I tried to upgrade from SA 3.2.5 to 3.3.0 by installing the newer one
from FreeBSD Ports.
Really? I just did a update of the port tree and yet
$ portversion p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin=
$ where SpamAssassin
p5-Mail-SpamAssass
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, RW wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:21:28 -0500 (EST)
James Smallacombe wrote:
I actually meant spamc's that had no spamd children to talk to. It
seems the ports version of SA replaced my original sa-spamd startup
script, which raised the max children from (default?) of 5 to
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 3/4/10 11:41 PM, James Smallacombe wrote:
I tried to upgrade from SA 3.2.5 to 3.3.0 by installing the newer one from
FreeBSD Ports. It seems that at least the Ports version thinks that the
latest SA requires perl 5.10.x, rather than 5.8.9, whi
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 11:41 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-03-04 15:41, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > spamfilter unix - n n - - pipe flags=Rq user=spamfilter \
> > argv=/usr/local/bin/spamfilter.sh \
> > -f ${sender} -- ${recipient}
> Definitely looks like SA isn
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 11:19 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-03-05 10:14, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > I'd suggest to do it right from the beginning. That is, exclusively use
> > the constraint rcvd or auth whitelisting variants. Also, is there any
> > valid reason you need this to be per-use
Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> My wife and I don't need to white-list the same people.
But if it simplifies the configuration, is there any harm in having
everything on a global whitelist? How often are you likely to receive
spam from someone your wife wanted whitelisted?
--
Bowie
On 2010-03-04 15:41, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-03-04 15:13, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
[snip]
How is SA called?
(Lines manually "continued" for easy reading.)
# grep spam /etc/postfix/master.cf
smtp inet n - n - - \
smtpd -o content_filter=spamfilter:
spa
Alex wrote on Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:02:35 -0500:
> I've trained probably 50 of these, yet they still have BAYES_50.
I trained your example and it went from 50 to 99. With *1* message!
There may be something wrong with your Bayes. With 400.000 tokens in the
db.
Why did you replace the @? And please
Justin Mason さんは書きました:
> Agreed, he's clearly unaware of
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6271
>
> Anyone care to craft a response? I think we should. bonus points for
> including the obligatory comp.risks tagline:
>
> "The RISK? Jumping to an invalid conclusion based o
On 2010-03-05 10:14, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 15:41 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-03-04 15:13, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
[snip]
How is SA called?
(Lines manually "continued" for easy reading.)
# grep spam /etc/postfix/master.cf
smtp inet n - n -
On 5.3.2010 17:23, Stephane MAGAND wrote:
> Hi
>
> ok i have put
> bayes_sql_override_username
>
> and now that's work thanks ;=)
>
> Another small question, after bayes, can i put AWL in MySQL ?
>
Yes you can, it's all in the doku or wiki. Anyway:
--- local.cf --
# Enable awl
auto_w
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:21:28 -0500 (EST)
James Smallacombe wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, RW wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 23:41:38 -0500 (EST)
> > James Smallacombe wrote:
> >
> >> Installing from ports automatically installs perl
> >> 5.10.1 which causes spamc children to run
2010/3/5 Karsten Bräckelmann :
> Nope, don't change it. It's a default for a reason. :)
>
> Setting this limit higher usually will not even catch more spam, since
> almost no spam exceeds that size. Typically, they are *much* smaller.
> However, ham with large attachments would then also be process
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 15:41 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-03-04 15:13, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > On a related note, the plain whitelist_from without a rcvd or auth
> > constraint is dangerous to use. If possible, always use the constraint
> > ones, and the plain one strictly as a fall-b
Carlos Mennens wrote:
> I noticed someone sent me an email and there are no SA heading info in
> the message. SA didn't provide a score or status on the message
> headers for some weird reason. I then checked my mail logs and saw
> this message:
>
> Mar 5 08:52:18 mail spamc[2635]: skipped message
Hi all,
I'm having trouble with an elusive spam for the past few days with
just "re" in the subject. It looks to be routed through hotmail.com,
but doesn't have an SPF signature, so I don't really understand.
Here's an example:
http://pastebin.com/Lg63Xek4
I've trained probably 50 of these, yet
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 10:42 -0500, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> I noticed someone sent me an email and there are no SA heading info in
> the message. SA didn't provide a score or status on the message
> headers for some weird reason. I then checked my mail logs and saw
> this message:
>
> Mar 5 08:52:
myself wrote:
> - contact the maintainer of IO::Socket::INET6 and sort out the problem;
> - avoid mapping 127.0.0.1 query into an IPv6 address of your
> nonrecursive DNS server.
> (preferably both).
Actually there are more options:
- allow your IPv6 DNS server to answer recursive queries fr
Luigi,
> 127.0.0.1.53 > 127.0.0.1.15896: [udp sum ok] 12915 q: ?
> 0.0.0.0.luigilauro.it. 1/0/0 0.0.0.0.luigilauro.it.
> 2002:4e2e:3890::1 (67)
> 127.0.0.1.53 > 127.0.0.1.24312: [udp sum ok] 12919 q: ?
> 127.0.0.1.luigilauro.it. 1/0/0 127.0.0.1.luigilauro.it.
> 2002:4e2e
I noticed someone sent me an email and there are no SA heading info in
the message. SA didn't provide a score or status on the message
headers for some weird reason. I then checked my mail logs and saw
this message:
Mar 5 08:52:18 mail spamc[2635]: skipped message, greater than max
message size (
On 3/4/10 11:41 PM, James Smallacombe wrote:
I tried to upgrade from SA 3.2.5 to 3.3.0 by installing the newer one
from FreeBSD Ports. It seems that at least the Ports version thinks
that the latest SA requires perl 5.10.x, rather than 5.8.9, which I
was already using. Installing from ports
Hi
ok i have put
bayes_sql_override_username
and now that's work thanks ;=)
Another small question, after bayes, can i put AWL in MySQL ?
bye
stephane
2010/3/5 David Morton :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Stephane MAGAND wrote:
>
>> mars 5 14:56:25.675 [13260] dbg:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, RW wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 23:41:38 -0500 (EST)
James Smallacombe wrote:
Installing from ports automatically installs perl
5.10.1 which causes spamc children to run wild and basically, spamd
can't cope with it.
I don't need or want perl 5.bleeding.ed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephane MAGAND wrote:
> mars 5 14:56:25.675 [13260] dbg: bayes: using username: root
This is not the mysql authentication username, this is talking about the
system username used to submit the request, and stored along with the
bayes tokens.
> mar
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:45:54 +0100
Stephane MAGAND wrote:
> Hi
>
> i have a small problems for connect Spamassassin 3.3.0 to my sql
> server:
>
> my local.cf:
>
> use_bayes 1
> bayes_auto_expire 0
> bayes_auto_learn1
> bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.1
> bayes_
Hi
i have a small problems for connect Spamassassin 3.3.0 to my sql server:
my local.cf:
use_bayes 1
bayes_auto_expire 0
bayes_auto_learn1
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.1
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 9.0
bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::B
> Forgot option -n, makes it unknown whether 'localhost' is 127.0.0.1 or ::1.
13:57:40.287618 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 30469, offset 0, flags [none],
proto UDP (17), length 66, bad cksum 0 (->5a4)!)
127.0.0.1.36192 > 127.0.0.1.53: [udp sum ok] 45090+ A?
marvin.luigilauro.it. (38)
13:57:40.28781
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 23:41:38 -0500 (EST)
James Smallacombe wrote:
> Installing from ports automatically installs perl
> 5.10.1 which causes spamc children to run wild and basically, spamd
> can't cope with it.
> I don't need or want perl 5.bleeding.edge, 5.8.9 was working just
>
Luigi,
> marvin% perl -le 'use IO::Socket::INET6; print IO::Socket::INET6->VERSION'
> 2.57
Good.
> > Try capturing your traffic on a loopback interface for port 53:
>
> This is the output with -vv for protocol decode with my recursive
> local DNS on 127.0.0.1 and my authorative DNS on listening
Agreed, he's clearly unaware of
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6271
Anyone care to craft a response? I think we should. bonus points for
including the obligatory comp.risks tagline:
"The RISK? Jumping to an invalid conclusion based on incomplete research."
;)
--j.
20
Hi
I have a curios message in my Spamassassin-Logfile since at least three
days:
Fri Mar 5 08:08:11 2010 [4958] info: rules: meta test EASY_URL has
dependency 'SPOOF_NET2COM' with a zero score
Fri Mar 5 08:08:11 2010 [4958] info: rules: meta test HARD_URL has
dependency 'HTTPS_IP_MISMATCH' wi
44 matches
Mail list logo
