On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:32:06 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> > jd wrote:
> >> A lot of older people still believe that giving the PC the wrong
> >> command will cause it to explode in a shower of sparks, thanks to
> >> Hollywood. It seems that Hollyw
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
--
"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want,
and deserve to get it good and hard." - H. L. Mencken
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
On Wednesday 10 February 2010, Per Jessen wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
A lot of older people still believe that giving the PC the wrong
command will cause it to explode in a shower of sparks, thanks to
Hollywood.
>>>
>>>No ageism here please :-) - a lot people will believe all kinds o
you need to send an email to this address to unsubscribe
users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org
It was in the header of the email
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Tim Alberts wrote:
>
>
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which pe
<>
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Electronics generating sparks when overloaded? Yes.
Generating smoke? Yes.
Flames? Yes.
A dynamic explosion? No.
(Never did figure out why all the electronics consoles in movies seem to
contain explosives...)
Self-destruct mechanism, obviously! :)
P
Mark Martinec wrote:
On Wednesday February 10 2010 10:45:37 Mike Cardwell wrote:
On 10/02/2010 00:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
MISSING_SUBJECT,
Now, why the message that SA is creating is getting TWO Subject: lines
is a different question.
because SA thinks it's got no subject, so it adds one as i
Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> A lot of older people still believe that giving the PC the wrong
>>> command will cause it to explode in a shower of sparks, thanks to
>>> Hollywood.
>>
>>No ageism here please :-) - a lot people will believe all kinds of
>>things about PCs.
>>
>>
>>/Per Jessen, Zürich
>>
>
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
jd wrote:
A lot of older people still believe that giving the PC the wrong
command will cause it to explode in a shower of sparks, thanks to
Hollywood. It seems that Hollywood is still doing that.
Electronics generating sparks when overloaded? Yes.
G
On Wednesday 10 February 2010, Per Jessen wrote:
>jd wrote:
>> Kurt Buff さんは書きました:
>>> Uh, paranoia is not mitigated by ignorance. Remember the earlier
>>> description of her friend: retired and partially disabled. This
>>> probably means older and not nearly as educated as we are about
>>> compute
On Wednesday 10 February 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>jd wrote:
>> A lot of older people still believe that giving the PC the wrong
>> command will cause it to explode in a shower of sparks, thanks to
>> Hollywood. It seems that Hollywood is still doing that.
>
>Electronics generating sparks when ove
On Wednesday 10 February 2010, te...@cnysupport.com wrote:
>Quoting jd :
>> Kurt Buff さんは書きました:
>>> Uh, paranoia is not mitigated by ignorance. Remember the earlier
>>> description of her friend: retired and partially disabled. This
>>> probably means older and not nearly as educated as we are abou
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:42:46 -0500
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> jd wrote:
> > A lot of older people still believe that giving the PC the wrong
> > command will cause it to explode in a shower of sparks, thanks to
> > Hollywood. It seems that Hollywood is still doing that.
> >
>
> Electronics generat
jd wrote:
Kurt Buff さんは書きました:
Uh, paranoia is not mitigated by ignorance. Remember the earlier
description of her friend: retired and partially disabled. This
probably means older and not nearly as educated as we are about
computers, and set in his/her ways. This, augmented by scare stories
in t
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote on Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:56:49 -0800:
MISSING_SUBJECT,
Now, why the message that SA is creating is getting TWO Subject: lines
is a different question.
because SA thinks it's got no subject, so it adds one as it is instructed
to tag the subject. Ob
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote on Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:58:01 -0800:
Our SA installation
is correctly tagging this as spam and sending it forward
to the user.
Well, the usual procedure (*) is to add headers that identify the message
as spam and maybe even show the score, so users c
jd wrote:
> Kurt Buff さんは書きました:
>>
>> Uh, paranoia is not mitigated by ignorance. Remember the earlier
>> description of her friend: retired and partially disabled. This
>> probably means older and not nearly as educated as we are about
>> computers, and set in his/her ways. This, augmented by sc
jd wrote:
> A lot of older people still believe that giving the PC the wrong
> command will cause it to explode in a shower of sparks, thanks to
> Hollywood. It seems that Hollywood is still doing that.
>
Electronics generating sparks when overloaded? Yes.
Generating smoke? Yes.
Flames? Ye
Quoting jd :
Kurt Buff さんは書きました:
Uh, paranoia is not mitigated by ignorance. Remember the earlier
description of her friend: retired and partially disabled. This
probably means older and not nearly as educated as we are about
computers, and set in his/her ways. This, augmented by scare
storie
Mike Cardwell wrote:
On 10/02/2010 00:04, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Thunderbird only displays the SECOND subject line.
So Thunderbird displays the last Subject line header it comes across. Is
that incorrect behaviour for an MUA?
I think it is. Setting aside the question of whether they are sup
Kurt Buff さんは書きました:
>
> Uh, paranoia is not mitigated by ignorance. Remember the earlier
> description of her friend: retired and partially disabled. This
> probably means older and not nearly as educated as we are about
> computers, and set in his/her ways. This, augmented by scare stories
> in t
Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 15:44 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
if I load it up in vi then vi claims there is a single blank
space after the colon.
It would be better to use od or beav rather than vi - both use
unambiguous notation for non-printable bytes. beav (if you have i
On Wednesday February 10 2010 10:45:37 Mike Cardwell wrote:
> On 10/02/2010 00:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> >> MISSING_SUBJECT,
> >>
> >> Now, why the message that SA is creating is getting TWO Subject: lines
> >> is a different question.
> >
> > because SA thinks it's got no subject, so it adds one a
On 2010-02-09 22:31, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
[Ideas for a new scheme similar to a subset of SPF.]
I don't think the SpamAssassin users list is the right place to discuss
a new generasl scheme like this, but here goes anyway.
Please not that the comments below is just a first reaction. I
On Wednesday February 10 2010 07:11:57 Tóth Attila wrote:
> Sorry for bringing up this topic again. It was previously discussed in
> 2006: http://markmail.org/message/76w27on2gf44262g
>
> I still don't see an established reason why spamassassin should tamper
> with shadow. From 2006: "Doesn't do a
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 17:51 -0800, jdow wrote:
> And for the type of applications he wants his best bet is Windows,
> sadly enough. And, predictably, he's infected. He and I are paranoid
> different ways. I am rather careful about my browsing and my system's
> still clean. I got nailed ONCE so far
On 10/02/2010 00:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
MISSING_SUBJECT,
Now, why the message that SA is creating is getting TWO Subject: lines
is a different question.
because SA thinks it's got no subject, so it adds one as it is instructed
to tag the subject. Obviously, it wants to see at least a white
On 10/02/2010 00:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Our SA installation
is correctly tagging this as spam and sending it forward
to the user.
Well, the usual procedure (*) is to add headers that identify the message
as spam and maybe even show the score, so users can have the mail client
file it to junk.
28 matches
Mail list logo
