ram wrote:
> Apparently you want to check if non mail servers are sending mails ..
> but what percentage of spams today come from non mail servers ?
The vast majority, I would say.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 22:08 -0500, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> You get an email delivered from 64.71.152.40 (last untrusted
> relay). You look up the DNS A record for that IP, and get
> mail.chaosreigns.com. Then you look up the DNS PTR record of
> 40.152.71.64.designatedsender.mail.chaosrei
You get an email delivered from 64.71.152.40 (last untrusted
relay). You look up the DNS A record for that IP, and get
mail.chaosreigns.com. Then you look up the DNS PTR record of
40.152.71.64.designatedsender.mail.chaosreigns.com, and if it's
127.0.0.1, it's a legit email sender and gets some ne
I wrote:
>> My tests have been mildly successful on this note, with FROM_WWW
>> already getting promoted out of testing:
>> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?rule=/FROM_W&srcpath=khop
>>
>> This indicates that we don't actually need to parse any further
>> because there is no sizable mass of legi
Dear sare-users Adam Katz tried to post these to your list. Please read
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/126545
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/126547
However, as in
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/126330
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Andreas Haumer wrote:
Hi!
Am 08.02.2010 21:47, schrieb Shane Williams:
I think you're both misunderstanding what the -b option does, and
reading the man page, I can see how it could be more explicit.
In any case, the -b option is used to send rejected mail to a
specified e
On 2/8/2010 9:52 AM, Tsabolov Sergey wrote:
> I have some little problem with SpamAssassin
>
> SpamAssassin with MailScanner .
>
> I set the rule in mailscanner
>
> # This can also be the filename of a ruleset.
> Cache SpamAssassin Results = yes
>
> SpamAssassin Cache Database File =
> /var/spoo
Hi!
Am 08.02.2010 21:47, schrieb Shane Williams:
> I think you're both misunderstanding what the -b option does, and
> reading the man page, I can see how it could be more explicit.
>
> In any case, the -b option is used to send rejected mail to a
> specified email address (in case you want to in
I think you're both misunderstanding what the -b option does, and
reading the man page, I can see how it could be more explicit.
In any case, the -b option is used to send rejected mail to a
specified email address (in case you want to inspect it). Someone can
correct me if I'm wrong, but I thin
Hi Christoph!
Am 08.02.2010 15:50, schrieb Christoph Lehmann:
> I've problems telling spamass-milter to reject mails.
>
> spamass-milter - Version 0.3.1
>
> I start it by:
>
> /usr/local/sbin/spamass-milter -p /var/run/spamass.sock -b
> spam...@ourdomain.com -u smmsp -f -r 15 -- -d spamscanner
Thank you everyone for all your assistance. This is resolved.
-Carlos
Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>> sa-update-keys should default to the same location as your local.cf
>> file. On my system, that is /etc/mail/spamassassin. Create the
>> directory and try the import again.
>>
>
> I created the directory f
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> sa-update-keys should default to the same location as your local.cf
> file. On my system, that is /etc/mail/spamassassin. Create the
> directory and try the import again.
I created the directory from scratch using the 'mkdir' command and it
Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure why root would have a problem writing to the file.
>> sa-update-keys IS a directory, right? Try removing the sa-update-keys
>> file/directory and then running the command again.
>>
>
> I don't
Carlos Williams came out of the corner and wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Mike Cardwell
> wrote:
> > The error message, "gpg required but not found," means that gpg was
> > required, but was not found. I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest
> > that maybe gpg wasn't found, but
I have some little problem with SpamAssassin
SpamAssassin with MailScanner .
I set the rule in mailscanner
# This can also be the filename of a ruleset.
Cache SpamAssassin Results = yes
SpamAssassin Cache Database File =
/var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/SpamAssassin.cache.db
I now the 3 days
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I'm not sure why root would have a problem writing to the file.
> sa-update-keys IS a directory, right? Try removing the sa-update-keys
> file/directory and then running the command again.
I don't think those directories exist. At least they
Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>> Sounds to me like you need to install the actual gpg package.
>> Installing the keys doesn't do much if the program that uses them
>> doesn't exist.
>>
>
> Yes this was 1/2 my problem for this matter. I only
On 08/02/2010 16:56, Joseph Brennan wrote:
Here's some more data for whatever it's worth.
Our spam reports box since Jan 25 shows this style in definite spam:
From: "Get Cialis on www.wa93.com"
From: "Get Tamiflu on www.qa35.com"
From: "Cheap Tamiflu on www.nu36.com"
This style was in a
Here's some more data for whatever it's worth.
Our spam reports box since Jan 25 shows this style in definite spam:
From: "Get Cialis on www.wa93.com"
From: "Get Tamiflu on www.qa35.com"
From: "Cheap Tamiflu on www.nu36.com"
This style was in a message in Portuguese (?) that I can't read
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Sounds to me like you need to install the actual gpg package.
> Installing the keys doesn't do much if the program that uses them
> doesn't exist.
Yes this was 1/2 my problem for this matter. I only had GnuPG v2
installed however I needed to
Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Mike Cardwell
> wrote:
>
>> The error message, "gpg required but not found," means that gpg was
>> required, but was not found. I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest
>> that maybe gpg wasn't found, but is required, and that you s
You should have tried the MailScanner mailing list.
stop MailScanner, rm
/var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/SpamAssassin.cache.db, and start
MailScanner.
More importantly, you need to update spamassassin and MailScanner to
more current versions.
MailScanner 4.58.9 is over 3 years old, and well out
I have some little problem with SpamAssassin
SpamAssassin with MailScanner .
I set the rule in mailscanner
# This can also be the filename of a ruleset.
Cache SpamAssassin Results = yes
SpamAssassin Cache Database File =
/var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/SpamAssassin.cache.db
I now the 3 days
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 15:07, Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Mike Cardwell
> wrote:
>> The error message, "gpg required but not found," means that gpg was
>> required, but was not found. I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest
>> that maybe gpg wasn't found, but i
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Mike Cardwell
wrote:
> The error message, "gpg required but not found," means that gpg was
> required, but was not found. I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest
> that maybe gpg wasn't found, but is required, and that you should install
> it?
As you guessed
On 08/02/2010 14:48, Carlos Williams wrote:
3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
Looks like someone has not applied the Jan 2010 patch
Yes - guilty as charged. Sorry all for my ignorance. I can sadly say I
have never ran 'sa-update' but when I tried, I got this err
I've problems telling spamass-milter to reject mails.
spamass-milter - Version 0.3.1
I start it by:
/usr/local/sbin/spamass-milter -p /var/run/spamass.sock -b
spam...@ourdomain.com -u smmsp -f -r 15 -- -d spamscanner.ourdomain.com
It should reject spam mails with a score higher 15, else send t
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:43 AM, John ffitch wrote:
>> 3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
>
> Looks like someone has not applied the Jan 2010 patch
Yes - guilty as charged. Sorry all for my ignorance. I can sadly say I
have never ran 'sa-update' but when I tried, I got
sa-update
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Carlos Williams :
3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
Did you update using saupdate?
--
Esta mensagem, incluindo seus anexos, podem conter informacoes privilegiadas e/ou de carater confidencial, nao e permitida a ret
3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
Looks like someone has not applied the Jan 2010 patch
==John ff
* Carlos Williams :
> 3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
Did you update using saupdate?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 4
For some reason when I send my self and email from my personal Postfix
mail server and add an attachment and or a URL hyperlink, it gets
flagged as ***SPAM*** from my email server. The headers are tagged
***SPAM*** from my Postfix mail server running Spamassassin and then
when I receive the message
33 matches
Mail list logo
