Le 27/01/2010 22:31, Kai Schaetzl a écrit :
John Wilcock wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:43:56 +0100:
someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the
sa-update files.
Now I understand. However, why am I not getting these warnings with a
spamassassin --lint?
Presumably becaus
This is a problem a lot of people face, some for more legitimate reasons
than others. I have an Earthlink.net account, from when they were smaller
and Sky Dayton still ran the show - actually from not long after he
founded the company. Over the years people forged the Earthlink address.
Earthlink
Hi
thanks for the quick answer
my coments below
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:54 AM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, ram wrote:
>
> it works, but i see most of the mails are tagged as SPAM.
>>
>
> A little more detail, please: Are you complaining about seeing lots of
> false positives?
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:34:46 +0800
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
>> Yes, and what may seem like a mere 1.6 points is causing me to have to
> request the whole spam threshold of that mailing list
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2850/raw be
> lowered just for me, just becaus
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 10:35 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Yes, but that's beside the point. That is not solving the bad thing
> you guys are doing.
Eh? stopping spammers is a bad thing now hey...
> MM> The world isn't perfect and the only way to get things changed is to
> complaint
>
On 1/27/10, Toni Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 27.01.2010 at 10:35:20 +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> > Will the new 3.3 be announced for Lenny (possibly via backports) or do I
> > need to use CPAN?
>
> you could probably file a wishlist bug against spamassassin, and/or
> prod someone to do
Hi Jadinni,
> > "MM" == Michael Mansour writes:
> MM> Why couldn't the mailing list filters simply whitelist your
> email address or MM> whitelist people automatically subscribed to
> the mailing list? Yes, but that's beside the point. That is not
> solving the bad thing you guys are doing
Hi Jidanni,
> Long ago, I tried mailing directly direct-to-mx style, but that of
> course didn't work, e.g., http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL109625
> So only 5% of my mail got through.
>
> So then I tried mailing through The ISP Here, Hinet.Net's SMTP
> server, but of course Hinet.Net has a
At 03:37 PM Wednesday, 1/27/2010, Mark Martinec wrote -=>
On Wednesday January 27 2010 23:28:46 Ed Kasky wrote:
> I have been using Mysql for bayes storage for quite some time very
> successfully for quite some time. After seeing a lot of spam coming
> through since upgrading I though I had bett
Long ago, I tried mailing directly direct-to-mx style, but that of
course didn't work, e.g., http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL109625
So only 5% of my mail got through.
So then I tried mailing through The ISP Here, Hinet.Net's SMTP server,
but of course Hinet.Net has a bad name. So only 50% of
On Wednesday January 27 2010 23:28:46 Ed Kasky wrote:
> I have been using Mysql for bayes storage for quite some time very
> successfully for quite some time. After seeing a lot of spam coming
> through since upgrading I though I had better check the scoring to
> see what was going on. Here's wha
I have been using Mysql for bayes storage for quite some time very
successfully for quite some time. After seeing a lot of spam coming
through since upgrading I though I had better check the scoring to
see what was going on. Here's what I found:
Jan 27 10:16:27 yoda spamd[30357]: Issuing rol
At 10:02 AM Wednesday, 1/27/2010, John Wilcock wrote -=>
Le 27/01/2010 18:57, Justin Mason a écrit :
Either someone forgot to delete all these rules, or (more likely IMO)
someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the sa-update
files.
I think you're dead right. It appears
John Wilcock wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:43:56 +0100:
> someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the
> sa-update files.
Now I understand. However, why am I not getting these warnings with a
spamassassin --lint?
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http:/
Thank you guys! I'm now down to just 5 non-existent rule warnings as well:
Jan 27 10:18:13.473 [19398] dbg: config: warning: score set for non-existent
rule SHORTCIRCUIT
Jan 27 10:18:13.473 [19398] dbg: config: warning: score set for non-existent
rule SUBJ_RE_NUM
Jan 27 10:18:13.473 [19398] dbg:
On 1/27/2010 1:02 PM, John Wilcock wrote:
Le 27/01/2010 18:57, Justin Mason a écrit :
Either someone forgot to delete all these rules, or (more likely IMO)
someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the
sa-update
files.
I think you're dead right. It appears one of the bu
Le 27/01/2010 18:57, Justin Mason a écrit :
Either someone forgot to delete all these rules, or (more likely IMO)
someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the sa-update
files.
I think you're dead right. It appears one of the build scripts does
the wrong thing with the 3.3
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 16:43, John Wilcock wrote:
> To state the problem again, 463 of the scores in the 50_scores.cf from 3.3.0
> sa-update refer to rules that used to be in 72_active.cf or 80_additional.cf
> in 3.2.5, but that neither of these two files are anywhere to be found in
> the 3.3.0 s
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, ram wrote:
it works, but i see most of the mails are tagged as SPAM.
A little more detail, please: Are you complaining about seeing lots of
false positives? Or are you complaining about seeing lots of properly
classified spams that are being delivered to your mailbox whe
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, R-Elists wrote:
in regards to
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jhardin/
Q1) what does this annotation mean?
* Do not publish the ADVANCE_FEE re-evolve test rules! *
This means they are development-only rules that exist for masscheck score
Le 27/01/2010 17:31, Kai Schaetzl a écrit :
John Wilcock wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:27:17 +0100:
Me too... 463 of them, to be exact.
Do you want to say that you changed the score of 463 rules?
No, absolutely not. On this test box I haven't changed the scores of any
rules. There are absol
Jeff,
> I'm getting the following parse errors after upgrading to 3.3.0:
>
> Jan 27 08:04:15.172 [30437] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping,
> in "/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf": use_auto_whitelist 1 Jan 27
> 08:04:15.172 [30437] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
> "
so what?
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
John Wilcock wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:27:17 +0100:
> Me too... 463 of them, to be exact.
Do you want to say that you changed the score of 463 rules?
> However, these two files don't seem to exist in
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003000/updates_spamassassin_org/
Indeed, that's why you are getti
On 1/27/2010 11:19 AM, Jackson, Jeff wrote:
I'm getting the following parse errors after upgrading to 3.3.0:
Jan 27 08:04:15.172 [30437] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
"/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf": use_auto_whitelist 1
Jan 27 08:04:15.172 [30437] warn: config: failed to p
I'm getting the following parse errors after upgrading to 3.3.0:
Jan 27 08:04:15.172 [30437] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
"/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf": use_auto_whitelist 1
Jan 27 08:04:15.172 [30437] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
"/etc/mail/spamassass
in regards to
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jhardin/
Q1) what does this annotation mean?
* Do not publish the ADVANCE_FEE re-evolve test rules! *
we frequently check for updates and it appears that we shouldnt at this time
until ???
Q2) when? :-)
tia
-
Hi
i recently installed 3.2.5 version of spamassassin
iam runing with simscan+spamassassin+clamav
it works, but i see most of the mails are tagged as SPAM.
like example
Jan 27 20:36:28 mail spamd[15138]: spamd: identified spam (9.1/5.0) for
simscan:509 in 3.7 seconds, 584 bytes.
Jan 27 20:36:2
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
So what should a Taiwan user (Taiwan~=Hinet)
user do. Buy a SMTP account with a US Company?
I told you what you can do.
Apart from that, again:
SARE is not part of SA.
SARE is deprecated.
So, why bother?
Why bother posting just to tell him that his fate
Kārlis Repsons wrote:
Hello spam assassins,
The question, which bothers me is about Bayes data size. How much is a typical
size of those data and what mechanisms are there to limit growing of it? Can
mysql be used for storage and would you recommend it (well, maybe it can then
be easier to sha
Kārlis Repsons wrote:
> Hello spam assassins,
> The question, which bothers me is about Bayes data size. How much is a
> typical
> size of those data and what mechanisms are there to limit growing of it? Can
> mysql be used for storage and would you recommend it (well, maybe it can then
> be ea
Le 27/01/2010 07:30, Ed Kasky a écrit :
Also - is anyone else getting a lot of "warning: score set for
non-existent rule" errors? I ran sa-update after teand continue to get
a slew of them...
Me too... 463 of them, to be exact.
With the exception of ACCESSDB where the score is set to 0 anyway
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:10:48 +0100:
> because his mail can be tagged as spam?
Not largely a problem. Did you look at the mailing list conversation he linked
to? It seems he's actively telling the mailing list owner how to tune SA and
reduce the required score to 2 (
KÄrlis Repsons wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:02:40 +:
> The question, which bothers me is about Bayes data size. How much is a
> typical
> size of those data
depends.
> and what mechanisms are there to limit growing of it?
it's all documented
> Can
> mysql be used for storage
that is
> jida...@jidanni.org wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:12:11 +0800:
> > So what should a Taiwan user (Taiwan~=Hinet)
> >HINET: Control of approx 8,476,149 IP addresses
> > http://www.fixedorbit.com/AS/3/AS3462.htm
> > user do. Buy a SMTP account with a US Company?
On 27.01.10 12:31, Kai Schaetzl
Hello spam assassins,
The question, which bothers me is about Bayes data size. How much is a typical
size of those data and what mechanisms are there to limit growing of it? Can
mysql be used for storage and would you recommend it (well, maybe it can then
be easier to share Spamassassin knowledg
At 03:31 AM Wednesday, 1/27/2010, you wrote -=>
Ed Kasky wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:30:23 -0800:
> FuzzyOcr
is it mentioned in the release notes? check back with the author of this
plugin if it is compatible with 3.3.0
> Also - is anyone else getting a lot of "warning: score set for
> non-ex
Ed Kasky wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:30:23 -0800:
> FuzzyOcr
is it mentioned in the release notes? check back with the author of this
plugin if it is compatible with 3.3.0
> Also - is anyone else getting a lot of "warning: score set for
> non-existent rule" errors? I ran sa-update after tean
jida...@jidanni.org wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:12:11 +0800:
> So what should a Taiwan user (Taiwan~=Hinet)
>HINET: Control of approx 8,476,149 IP addresses
> http://www.fixedorbit.com/AS/3/AS3462.htm
> user do. Buy a SMTP account with a US Company?
I told you what you can do.
Apart from t
Jdow wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:07:14 -0800:
> And it has this disgraceful habit. It works.
You are special, anyway.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Hi,
On Wed, 27.01.2010 at 10:35:20 +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> Will the new 3.3 be announced for Lenny (possibly via backports) or do I
> need to use CPAN?
you could probably file a wishlist bug against spamassassin, and/or
prod someone to do it?
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
Kin
On 27.1.2010 10:43, Henrik K wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:38:38AM +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to install it via CPAN or debian deb, so I do not have the
>> sql-readme available.
>>
>> The AWL format changed, can someone post the MySQL desc output please?
>
> http://svn.a
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:38:38AM +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
> I'm trying to install it via CPAN or debian deb, so I do not have the
> sql-readme available.
>
> The AWL format changed, can someone post the MySQL desc output please?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/branches/3.3
I'm trying to install it via CPAN or debian deb, so I do not have the
sql-readme available.
The AWL format changed, can someone post the MySQL desc output please?
--
http://www.iki.fi/jarif/
That secret you've been guarding, isn't.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Will the new 3.3 be announced for Lenny (possibly via backports) or do I
need to use CPAN?
Thanks for info.
--
http://www.iki.fi/jarif/
That secret you've been guarding, isn't.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
45 matches
Mail list logo
