Hi,
> Fellows, I have the highest spam score vs. all my buddies:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2850/raw
>
> It's all because
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_header1.cf
> headerSARE_RECV_SPAM_DOMN0bReceived =~
> /\bdynamic.hinet\.(?:com|net|org|inf
On 1/26/10 12:29 AM, "jida...@jidanni.org" wrote:
> So how is anybody living in Taiwan supposed to mail things with honor?
> They can't get another country, nor cause a revolution. You just paint
> them all with one brush. What if you painted everybody in your home
> country with one brush until
Am Dienstag 26 Januar 2010 schrieb jida...@jidanni.org:
> Fellows, I have the highest spam score vs. all my buddies:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2850/raw
>
> It's all because
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_header1.cf
> headerSARE_RECV_SPAM_DOMN0b
Fellows, I have the highest spam score vs. all my buddies:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2850/raw
It's all because
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_header1.cf
headerSARE_RECV_SPAM_DOMN0bReceived =~
/\bdynamic.hinet\.(?:com|net|org|info)/
describe SARE_
> On 1-25-2010 8:42 AM, Richard Smits wrote:
>> Does anyone knows any tricks to fight russian spam ? We are getting a
>> lot of this for the last weeks.
On 25.01.10 08:56, Dan Schaefer wrote:
> I have dealt with Russian spam by using on "en" in the ok_languages
> variable and increasing the sc
On 1-25-2010 8:42 AM, Richard Smits wrote:
Does anyone knows any tricks to fight russian spam ? We are getting a
lot of this for the last weeks.
I have dealt with Russian spam by using on "en" in the ok_languages
variable and increasing the score for "UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY" to 10. I
also incre
Hello,
Does anyone knows any tricks to fight russian spam ? We are getting a
lot of this for the last weeks.
I am looking at the RelayCountry plugin, but am worried that our russian
customers will get more false positives.
It is difficult because SA does not recognize the russian charset, b
> On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 20:53 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Appears the bounce, any email addresses and the attached "original" are
> > *severely* munged. Spotted a hint, need this to generate a direct
> > bounce.
> >
> > Will unsubscribe the offender, if I can track it down.
On 23.01.10
> Rick Knight writes:
>
> > -0.0 DKIM_VERIFIED Domain Keys Identified Mail: signature
> > passes verification
> > 0.0 DKIM_SIGNEDDomain Keys Identified Mail: message has a
> > signature
On 23.01.10 15:46, Greg Troxel wrote:
> I supsect this isn't your issue, but I have been
