Re: segmentation fault on startup

2010-01-10 Thread Michael Parker
On Jan 10, 2010, at 6:58 PM, Robert P. Weaver wrote: [28414] dbg: replacetags: replacing tags [28414] dbg: replacetags: done replacing tags [28414] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O /users/ rweaver/.spamassassin/bayes_toks [28414] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O /users/ rweaver/.spamassas

Re: [sa] segmentation fault on startup

2010-01-10 Thread Charles Gregory
I don't know that it applies to specifically spamassassin, but I used to run into considerable nuisance with seg faults on Solaris when the parameters of scripts were a specific number of bytes - I think around multiples of 32. So you might achieve joy by adjusting the length of a filename som

Re: FW by administra...@willspc.net : Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2010-01-10 Thread Mike Cardwell
On 10/01/2010 23:39, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello Guys, > > is there someone authoritative andcan unsubscribe the E-Mail > > spamassas...@hundredacrewood.willspc.net > > It sems, he has a rewirte scripr which chenge the Date: and To: headers > and the mails seems to be send to him direc

FW by administra...@willspc.net : Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2010-01-10 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Guys, is there someone authoritative andcan unsubscribe the E-Mail spamassas...@hundredacrewood.willspc.net It sems, he has a rewirte scripr which chenge the Date: and To: headers and the mails seems to be send to him directly by me, which is not right I am bombed by this server with

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-10 Thread Bill Landry
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Bill Landry [mailto:b...@inetmsg.com] >> Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 12:42 PM >> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >> Subject: Re: About upgrading >> >> LuKreme wrote: >>> On 9-Jan-2010, at 21:23, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: >>>

RE: About upgrading

2010-01-10 Thread Rosenbaum, Larry M.
> -Original Message- > From: Bill Landry [mailto:b...@inetmsg.com] > Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 12:42 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: About upgrading > > LuKreme wrote: > > On 9-Jan-2010, at 21:23, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: > > > >> It's the number of seconds s

Re: How to tell if sa-update is actually running

2010-01-10 Thread mouss
R P Herrold a écrit : > On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, mouss wrote: > >> you can query DNS to get the "version" of the rules. for example: >> >> $ host -t txt "*.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org" >> *.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org descriptive text "895075" >> >> (2.3 is the "reverse" of 3.2, which corresponds to

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-10 Thread Bill Landry
LuKreme wrote: > On 9-Jan-2010, at 21:23, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: > >> It's the number of seconds since the epoch (Jan 1, 1970). One easy way to >> convert it to a readable time is >> >> # perl -e 'print scalar localtime 1263044805, "\n"' >> Sat Jan 9 08:46:45 2010 Or even simpler: perl -l

Re: semi-legit senders in DNSWL and habeas - a hard problem

2010-01-10 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Tue 05 Jan 2010 09:59:15 PM CET, Michael Scheidell wrote and if someone wants to get linkedin email, they should get a hotmail or gmail account. talk about bussiness now ? -- xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-10 Thread LuKreme
On 9-Jan-2010, at 21:23, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: > It's the number of seconds since the epoch (Jan 1, 1970). One easy way to > convert it to a readable time is > > # perl -e 'print scalar localtime 1263044805, "\n"' > Sat Jan 9 08:46:45 2010 % date -r 1263044805 Sat Jan 9 06:46:45 MST 2

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-10 Thread LuKreme
On 9-Jan-2010, at 07:07, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > LuKreme writes: > >> I think he (she?) > > He. Cecilia and Cecile are female, but Cecil is male. Think about Cecil > B. DeMill. I thought I was referring to Kai, which can go either way. I know Cecil is a male name. -- Wally: That's my nickn

Re: How to tell if sa-update is actually running

2010-01-10 Thread Kai Schaetzl
R P Herrold wrote on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 00:13:33 -0500 (EST): > Looks like 3.3 is not so behaving it is, a wildcard is missing, You have to use 0.3.3. Btw, I'm not getting NXDOMAIN on the wildcard but the SPF entry. Kai -- Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-10 Thread Cecil Westerhof
Jeff Mincy writes: >But it does not seem to be interesting in my situation. >First my code has to grow from: >sa-learn --${typeStr} ${HOME}/Maildir/.SpamDir.${dirStr}/cur/ >to: >for i in ${HOME}/Maildir/.SpamDir.${dirStr}/cur/*; do >spamc -L ${typeStr} <${i

Re: Documentation spamc -L is wrong

2010-01-10 Thread Cecil Westerhof
RW writes: >> But when I run spamc -L I get a return code 0 back. I am working with: >> SpamAssassin Client version 3.2.5 > > > Have you checked spamc.conf to make sure there isn't a long forgotten > -E or --exitcode lurking there? SYSCONFDIR is not defined and in /etc/mail/spamassassin ther