On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, mouss wrote:
you can query DNS to get the "version" of the rules. for example:
$ host -t txt "*.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org"
*.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org descriptive text "895075"
(2.3 is the "reverse" of 3.2, which corresponds to the SA version you use).
Looks like 3.
--Original Message-
> From: Alex [mailto:mysqlstud...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2010 9:13 PM
> To: SA Mailing list
> Subject: Re: About upgrading
>
> Hi,
>
> > sa-learn --dump magic gives:
> > 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes
> db version
>
Hi,
> sa-learn --dump magic gives:
> 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
> 0.000 0 57538 0 non-token data: nspam
> 0.000 0 74876 0 non-token data: nham
> 0.000 0 166338
Hi,
> Lest people think I object to all whitelists, I'd like to point out that
> tonight I got spam from reachmail.net that was listed in HOSTKARMA_WL.
> I sent it off to supp...@junkemailfilter.com and SEVEN AND A HALF
> MINUTES later Marc told me that the offending sender had been removed
That'
There is an error in the 'sa_update' cron script as I published it, but
it has a simple fix:
Replace the single reference to $chkd with $sau so the first 'if'
statement reads:
if [ -x $sau ]
The intention is that the script will only attempt to run the SA issued
sa_update if it
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 20:02:08 +0100
Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> But when I run spamc -L I get a return code 0 back. I am working with:
> SpamAssassin Client version 3.2.5
Have you checked spamc.conf to make sure there isn't a long forgotten
-E or --exitcode lurking there?
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:24:56 +0100
Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> Jeff Mincy writes:
>
> >I upgraded from 3.0.4 to 3.2.5. I have the feeling that sa-learn
> > takes more time with 3.2.5 as it took with 3.0.4. Can this be true?
> >
> >It is not a problem, because it is done by cron-tab, bu
From: Cecil Westerhof
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:24:56 +0100
Jeff Mincy writes:
>I upgraded from 3.0.4 to 3.2.5. I have the feeling that sa-learn takes
>more time with 3.2.5 as it took with 3.0.4. Can this be true?
>
>It is not a problem, because it is
> "MG" == Martin Gregorie writes:
MG> I run this script as a weekly cron job:
I just use one line in my crontab:
33 2 * * * sa-update
If something goes wrong I'll get a mail with the errors. Else nothing
will interrupt my leisure yacht cruise.
Cecil Westerhof writes:
> The documentation says:
> -L learn type, --learntype=type
>Send message to spamd for learning. The "learn type" can be
> either spam, ham or forget. The exitcode for spamc will be set
>to 5 if the message was learned, or 6 if it was alrea
The documentation says:
-L learn type, --learntype=type
Send message to spamd for learning. The "learn type" can be either
spam, ham or forget. The exitcode for spamc will be set
to 5 if the message was learned, or 6 if it was already learned.
Note that th
Jeff Mincy writes:
>I upgraded from 3.0.4 to 3.2.5. I have the feeling that sa-learn takes
>more time with 3.2.5 as it took with 3.0.4. Can this be true?
>
>It is not a problem, because it is done by cron-tab, but I am just
>curious.
>
> You can use spamc -L spam/ham to learn
From: Cecil Westerhof
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 14:39:59 +0100
Cecil Westerhof writes:
> I did the upgrade. It took some time and there was a slight problem with
> permissions, but it looks like a successful upgrade. I only changed
> /dev/null to a real mailbox, because of
LuKreme writes:
> I think he (she?)
He. Cecilia and Cecile are female, but Cecil is male. Think about Cecil
B. DeMill.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Cecil Westerhof writes:
> I did the upgrade. It took some time and there was a slight problem with
> permissions, but it looks like a successful upgrade. I only changed
> /dev/null to a real mailbox, because of the 2010 problem. When something
> like this happens again I now can recover those e-m
Kai Schaetzl writes:
>> you have changed WHAT???
>
> He means he uses procmail and used to send all spam to /dev/null.
That is right. I also made the following script:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# When --no-filename is not an accepted parameter for grep use -h
# When --max-count=1 is not a
On 9-Jan-2010, at 04:31, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> Kai Schaetzl writes:
>>
>> I only changed /dev/null to a real mailbox,
> you have changed WHAT???
I think he (she?) meant that the local delivery for certain spam-thresholds was
set to /dev/null and that's been changed to a real mailbo
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote on Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:31:26 +0100:
> you have changed WHAT???
He means he uses procmail and used to send all spam to /dev/null.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
> Kai Schaetzl writes:
> > There's always a document about updating from the various old versions,
> > read it and you will be prepared for most problems. But your SA is
> > *really* old, expect some minor config problems.
On 06.01.10 02:57, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> I did the upgrade. It took s
Ramprasad wrote:
http://www.zimbra.com/forums/administrators/36295-every-new-message-flagged-exploit-pdf-9669-nothing-getting-through.html
How do I disable False positives with clam
For now I am disabling clam totally on all servers .. anyway real
viruses are so few.
Obviously someone got
20 matches
Mail list logo
