What is the error with clamav module

2010-01-08 Thread Ramprasad
http://www.zimbra.com/forums/administrators/36295-every-new-message-flagged-exploit-pdf-9669-nothing-getting-through.html How do I disable False positives with clam For now I am disabling clam totally on all servers .. anyway real viruses are so few.

Re: How to tell if sa-update is actually running

2010-01-08 Thread Martin Gregorie
Here's a script correction for an obvious mistake that I managed not to spot. In summary, it is: s/$chkd/$sau/ IOW the script should read: == #!/bin/bash # # Update the Spamassassin rules # sau=/usr/bin/sa-update if [ -x $sa

Re: which SA database to use

2010-01-08 Thread Khanh Truong
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue does belong to qmailq so does this mean that I should run sa-learn under qmailq? I did some tests and this doesn't make any sense. I put required_score 7 into /var/qmail/.spamassass/user_prefs and ran su qmailq -c "spamc < sample_email.txt" but the output still show

RE: which SA database to use

2010-01-08 Thread Brian Bebeau
> I have qmail running with the > > :allow,QMAILQUEUE="/usr/bin/qmail-spamc" > > in /etc/tcp.smtp > > I have some hams/spams that I want to run sa-learn against, but I > can't figure out which database it is qmail filters through. Is it the > db of the user "spamd", "root" or some qmail

Re: How to tell if sa-update is actually running

2010-01-08 Thread mouss
clem...@dwf.com a écrit : > How do I tell if sa-update is actually running? > I mean, yes, I can run it by hand and get no error messages, and with -D > I dont see any problems, still I feel that my stuff isnt current, and that > there > should be an update. > > Should I be getting a message in /

Re: Spamhaus and paid subscription

2010-01-08 Thread d . hill
Quoting Raymond Dijkxhoorn : Hi! Can't you do zone transfers? Then you can do away with the subscriber_key thing and have DNS resolve locally for spamhaus.org and not have to query their DNS servers. They sell datafeed and they sell queries, we bought queries. I do not believe they would th

Re: Broken mass mailings - Delivered-To: issue

2010-01-08 Thread Charles Gregory
Ooops. Sorry. A poster replied offlist, and when I attempted to put it back on-list, I lamely inserted the SA users list address instead of the procmail list address. (smack forehead) Disregard. -C On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Charles Gregory wrote: : Please reply to list. This reply is to list...

Re: Broken mass mailings - Delivered-To: issue

2010-01-08 Thread Charles Gregory
Please reply to list. This reply is to list... On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Richard B. Emerson wrote: : Actually, the example note has To: bab...@yahoogroups.com not To: : ch...@pinefields.com... The To header is irrelevant. Mail to this list is addressed "To:" the list. But the *envelope* (which is cap

which SA database to use

2010-01-08 Thread Khanh Truong
Hi, I have qmail running with the :allow,QMAILQUEUE="/usr/bin/qmail-spamc" in /etc/tcp.smtp I have some hams/spams that I want to run sa-learn against, but I can't figure out which database it is qmail filters through. Is it the db of the user "spamd", "root" or some qmail user account? An

RE: [SPAM:9.6] Re: [SPAM:9.6] Re: semi-legit senders in DNSWL and habeas - a hard problem

2010-01-08 Thread R-Elists
> From: Christian Brel > Sensible folk know people like Return Path will never grow > the balls to stand up to eBay, they will just take the money > and smile. > Christian Brel, are you suggesting that orgs like Return Path buy some body part growth pharma ? ;-> - rh

Re: Spamhaus and paid subscription

2010-01-08 Thread jp
The way it works is you rsync the zone on a scheule, and rbldnsd serves it. We subscribed to it for a while and liked it, just wished they had some different pricing tiers. We setup a virtual machine to do the rsyncing/rbldnsd and had our main dns servers (as used by the resolv.conf on the spam

Re: sa-update failing

2010-01-08 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Hi! Upgrade to SVN version this is a issue with RC1. It looks to me like one of the devs fixed the rule. I'm still running rc1, but the errors have disappeared. Ah okay perfect! Thanks, Raymond.

Re: sa-update failing

2010-01-08 Thread Mark Martinec
On Friday 08 January 2010 15:16:26 Jason Bertoch wrote: > Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote: > > Upgrade to SVN version this is a issue with RC1. > > It looks to me like one of the devs fixed the rule. I'm still running > rc1, but the errors have disappeared. Yes, it's been fixed yesterday evening, but i

Re: sa-update failing

2010-01-08 Thread Jason Bertoch
Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote: Upgrade to SVN version this is a issue with RC1. It looks to me like one of the devs fixed the rule. I'm still running rc1, but the errors have disappeared.

Re: How to tell if sa-update is actually running

2010-01-08 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 19:14 -0700, clem...@dwf.com wrote: > How do I tell if sa-update is actually running? > I mean, yes, I can run it by hand and get no error messages, and with -D > I dont see any problems, still I feel that my stuff isnt current, and that > there > should be an update. > > Sh