http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091219-r892451-n/T_RCVD_IN_SEMBLACK/detail
SEMBLACK normally is one of the better performing blacklists, but it
behaved abnormally in this weekly masscheck.
18.85.2.155 is one IP that was listed, but not listed on any other
blacklist. There were many more
On 12/18/2009 08:57 PM, Warren Togami wrote:
This will be released if we go three days without an objection as per build/README
procedure. At that point these archives will be renamed to "rc1" and the
announcements will go out. Please suggest improvements to this announcement text as well.
H
On Dec 19, 2009, at 8:42 PM, "jida...@jidanni.org"
wrote:
Regarding sa-update,
EXIT CODES
This would then not stop Makefiles that call it, nor would one need to
do case $? in 0|1)...; esac.
But it would break scripts that check for a 0 and then run sa-compile
on the freshly downloaded
Regarding sa-update,
EXIT CODES
An exit code of 0 means an update was available, and was
downloaded and installed successfully if --checkonly was
not specified.
An exit code of 1 means no fresh updates were available.
I would make this:
0 means you are all up to date
On 19/12/2009 5:51 PM, Charles Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Warren Togami wrote:
>> Why wait, when you do relatively simple things to help make it happen?
>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/NightlyMassCheck
>> We can more frequently update rules if more people participate in the
>> nig
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009, Res wrote:
the only person here at present trolling is you, so for F's sake STFU
and stop generating massive noise ratio
(nod) Done.
- C
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Warren Togami wrote:
Why wait, when you do relatively simple things to help make it happen?
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/NightlyMassCheck
We can more frequently update rules if more people participate in the
nightly masschecks. The current documentation is a bit of a
>
> > do i need to read the apache foundation docs somewhere?
>
> You're of course more than welcome to. Perhaps the best
> place to start is here [4] and here [5].
>
> [1] http://spamassassin.apache.org/
> [2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/CREDITS
> [3] http://www.apache.
On Saturday 19 December 2009, Dave Pooser wrote:
>> Love that quote. Think I'll steal it.
>
>It's worth stealing. Charles A. Oriez, aka "Socks the Whitehouse Cat," used
>that .sig file on some mailop/anti-spam lists I frequented back in the day.
>He died back in September of '05, and I later learne
On 19-Dec-2009, at 14:40, Dave Pooser wrote:
>> Love that quote. Think I'll steal it.
>
> It's worth stealing. Charles A. Oriez, aka "Socks the Whitehouse Cat," used
> that .sig file on some mailop/anti-spam lists I frequented back in the day.
> He died back in September of '05, and I later learne
> Love that quote. Think I'll steal it.
It's worth stealing. Charles A. Oriez, aka "Socks the Whitehouse Cat," used
that .sig file on some mailop/anti-spam lists I frequented back in the day.
He died back in September of '05, and I later learned that the entire time
I'd "known" him he'd been livin
On 19/12/2009 11:23 AM, R-Elists wrote:
> i would encourage other SA team members to have a wish list and publish.
A number of committers have have added Amazon wishlists to the CREDITS
file included with the distribution. The most up-to-date version is
available on our website [1] by clicking CR
And bless you, sir.
Merry Christmas.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "R-Elists"
Sent: Friday, 2009/December/18 21:13
Justin,
We were able to knock off 4 items in the Amazon USA list with expedited
shipping 8 to 16 days from USA.
hopefully it will take them off your wish list...
you know, with all the duking it out on the list over some methods and such,
where is Jo Rhett when you need him?
he was always short and to the point...
:-)
- rh
>
> It would be nice to be able to throw some cycles at this
> problem, but it might take more more to figure out how to do
> that safely than it's worth?
>
> Anyway, if something gets figured out count me in on
> contributing space CPU time.
couldnt the data be encoded and then unencoded
On 19-Dec-2009, at 09:06, Dave Pooser wrote:
> On 12/18/09 11:13 PM, "R-Elists" wrote:
> Is there anything that would help out the cause, hardware-wise? I think I
> remember Justin saying that privacy concerns about the email corpus made
> sharing the load impossible -- might it be possible to sha
>
> Hopefully you didn't buy him that brewing book, or we'll
> NEVER get any more rules out of him! :^)
snip
> Is there anything that would help out the cause,
> hardware-wise? I think I remember Justin saying that privacy
> concerns about the email corpus made sharing the load
> impossible
On 12/18/09 11:13 PM, "R-Elists" wrote:
> We were able to knock off 4 items in the Amazon USA list with expedited
> shipping 8 to 16 days from USA.
Hopefully you didn't buy him that brewing book, or we'll NEVER get any more
rules out of him! :^)
> if you need us to put an industrial rackmount
Am 19.12.09 04:18, schrieb Warren Togami:
> DNSWL
> To my surprise, Matthias has begun to implement my recommendations of
> improved manual abuse reporting, and automated abuse reporting. Their
> accuracy even without automated abuse detection isn't too bad.
In the current testing phase, the re
19 matches
Mail list logo
