I would have to agree. The measures to ensure the integrity of the users
are thorough, and the price is minimal. Having gone through the process of
becoming a whitelisted sender (.edu), it made me feel confident endorsing
and using their white/blacklist.
And this is from someone who has been on
Rob McEwen wrote:
Bob O'Brien wrote:
But I have to say (and this is just my personal opinion) that all the
people shouting "conspiracy!" (even if joking about it) may have done
irreparable harm to the potential for corporations (not just Barracuda)
supporting this community in th
Bob O'Brien wrote:
> But I have to say (and this is just my personal opinion) that all the
> people shouting "conspiracy!" (even if joking about it) may have done
> irreparable harm to the potential for corporations (not just Barracuda)
> supporting this community in the future.
Bob,
Someone I ha
On 12/12/09 3:52 PM, "Bob O'Brien" wrote:
> I am "the whitelist guy" at Barracuda, so I work with them.
> In my opinion, the $20 fee should be considered more like a CAPTCHA.
> It's not simple "pay to play" either. Reports get investigated, and
> delistings can happen. As I'm sure many of the v
Bob O'Brien wrote:
I am "the whitelist guy" at Barracuda, so I work with them.
In my opinion, the $20 fee should be considered more like a CAPTCHA.
It's not simple "pay to play" either. Reports get investigated, and
delistings can happen. As I'm sure many of the volunteers here are
all too
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009, jdow wrote:
> From: "Marc Perkel"
> Sent: Saturday, 2009/December/12 09:42
> >
> >Sahil Tandon wrote:
> >On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Marc Perkel wrote:
> >
> > Been using emailreg.org for several months now and it seems like a
> >really good white list. Anyone else using it?
> >
> >
Michael Scheidell wrote:
But... you draw your own conclusions. the best thing about a
conspiracy theory is that there is little proof. if this is little
proof, then this would make a good conspiracy theory.
YMMV.
I have more evidence for you:
Barracuda Networks uses the emailreg.or
From: "Marc Perkel"
Sent: Saturday, 2009/December/12 09:42
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Marc Perkel wrote:
Been using emailreg.org for several months now and it seems like a
really good white list. Anyone else using it?
Not here. They charge a $20.00 administrative fee per regis
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009, Marc Perkel wrote:
[HTML snipped]
I'm thrilled that it works well for you; my note was for posterity and
other readers who might benefit from knowing about the odd inconsistency
I mentioned in my initial reply.
--
Sahil Tandon
On 12/12/09 11:30 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Marc Perkel wrote:
Been using emailreg.org for several months now and it seems like a
really good white list. Anyone else using it?
Not here. They charge a $20.00 administrative fee per registered
domain, purportedly to
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Marc Perkel wrote:
Been using emailreg.org for several months now and it seems like a
really good white list. Anyone else using it?
Not here. They charge a $20.00 administrative fee per registered
domain, purportedly to preven
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Been using emailreg.org for several months now and it seems like a
> really good white list. Anyone else using it?
Not here. They charge a $20.00 administrative fee per registered
domain, purportedly to prevent "domain tasters". This is odd, given
their
12 matches
Mail list logo
