Daniel D Jones wrote:
> Running 3.2.5 under Debian Etch.
>
> I'm trying to add the Spamassassin X_Report_Header. Per the website at
>
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
>
> report_safe ( 0 | 1 | 2 ) (default: 1)
> ...
> If this option is set to 0, incoming
Running 3.2.5 under Debian Etch.
I'm trying to add the Spamassassin X_Report_Header. Per the website at
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
report_safe ( 0 | 1 | 2 ) (default: 1)
...
If this option is set to 0, incoming spam is only modified by adding some
On søn 29 nov 2009 12:59:32 CET, Jonas Eckerman wrote
I'd assume that a big ISP using SA (and wants the best from SA
install) would pay to use the better DNSBLs.
ask recipient if a isp does a well good job of stopping spam to ones
inbox, payed dnsbl or not :=)
shared rbl listes is silly, s
Martijn Grooten wrote:
- I'm happy to add any extensions as long as these are also free and
open source -- note that our 'target audience' includes big ISPs and
unfortunately for them things as Spamhaus's RBL aren't free;
This doesn't make any sense. You are comparing SA to commercial products
