Re: New image spam

2009-11-14 Thread LuKreme
On 14-Nov-2009, at 10:58, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On lør 14 nov 2009 17:31:11 CET, Alex wrote >> That's a good idea, but an administrative nightmare with many users, >> particularly with the "fail first, correct later" attitude, they would >> kill me. > > i maked a script in php that dump horde ad

Re: New image spam

2009-11-14 Thread Benny Pedersen
On lør 14 nov 2009 20:11:09 CET, Homer Parker wrote On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 18:58 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote: i maked a script in php that dump horde addressbook to whitelist_auth.cf Only if everyone uses webmail... so how do i solve other problems ? if you make me a ldap addressbook and woul

Re: New image spam

2009-11-14 Thread Homer Parker
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 18:58 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote: > i maked a script in php that dump horde addressbook to > whitelist_auth.cf Only if everyone uses webmail... -- Homer Parker

Re: New image spam

2009-11-14 Thread Benny Pedersen
On lør 14 nov 2009 17:31:11 CET, Alex wrote That's a good idea, but an administrative nightmare with many users, particularly with the "fail first, correct later" attitude, they would kill me. i maked a script in php that dump horde addressbook to whitelist_auth.cf put that in a daily cron, so

Re: New image spam

2009-11-14 Thread Alex
> no way of helping.. someone (something) truncated the email in pastbin.. > doesn't have the mime headers with any attachment, in fact, don't see an > attachment. Please find updated one here: http://pastebin.com/m291e486b Benny, > score DKIM_SIGNED 5 > score USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST -5.0 > whit

Re: use passwd file to control senders

2009-11-14 Thread neroxyr
Adam Katz-10 wrote: > > Neroxyr may have been asking something else. Is this regarding mail > *received* from unknown senders? Do you want to check for forged > senders? Do you want to check for invalid recipients? > Mails received are not the problem, i want to check for forged senders tha

Re: New image spam

2009-11-14 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 14 November 2009, Alex wrote: >Hi all, > >Has anyone else seen an increase in image spam lately? > >http://pastebin.com/m47617898 > >The LOC_IMGSPAM is a local rule I created that simply checks for >/inline/ content disposition. I've changed the @ to # to pass the >pastebin filters. > >

Re: sought rules

2009-11-14 Thread Charles Gregory
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, jp wrote: Post your server and bandwidth requirements here. I'm sure many of us would have the datacenter space and capacity to host a redundant backup. It's wonderful to see so many people offer 'mirror' space, but as I understand things, the issue is not with delivery/do

Re: New image spam

2009-11-14 Thread Benny Pedersen
On lør 14 nov 2009 07:25:20 CET, Alex wrote Any ideas what I could be missing on catching this one? Please let me know if I can provide any additional information. score DKIM_SIGNED 5 score USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST -5.0 whitelist_from_dkim fri...@sbcglobal.net -- xpoint

Re: New image spam

2009-11-14 Thread Michael Scheidell
Alex wrote: Hi all, Has anyone else seen an increase in image spam lately? http://pastebin.com/m47617898 The LOC_IMGSPAM is a local rule I created that simply checks for /inline/ content disposition. I've changed the @ to # to pass the pastebin filters. no way of helping.. someone (somethi

Re: sought rules

2009-11-14 Thread jp
Post your server and bandwidth requirements here. I'm sure many of us would have the datacenter space and capacity to host a redundant backup. On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 03:29:07PM +, Justin Mason wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 14:04, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > john ffitch wrote: > >> Have I mis