On Tuesday 20 October 2009, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 17:53 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>Slightly off-topic interjection, though it may help other fetchmail
>users.
>
>> What can I use to replace fetchmail with then?
>
>getmail
>
>> Fetchmail has such an option according to the
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:39:38 -0600
LuKreme wrote:
> On 20-Oct-2009, at 17:30, Evan Platt wrote:
> > A ISP would not send mail just because my mx is named
> > something.dyndns.org ?
>
> More likely because your IP is in the PBL or because your rDNS fails
> to match your hostname.
That's a reas
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, LuKreme wrote:
On 20-Oct-2009, at 17:30, Evan Platt wrote:
A ISP would not send mail just because my mx is named something.dyndns.org?
More likely because your IP is in the PBL or because your rDNS fails to
match your hostname.
I don't think _anybody_ checks a domain's
On 20-Oct-2009, at 17:30, Evan Platt wrote:
A ISP would not send mail just because my mx is named something.dyndns.org
?
More likely because your IP is in the PBL or because your rDNS fails
to match your hostname.
--
'You know me,' said Rincewind. 'Just when I'm getting a grip on
somethin
At 04:25 PM 10/20/2009, you wrote:
Because many mail servers will not talk to you directly on a dynamic
IP and will not accept outbound mail from you on a dynamic IP. Also,
if your connection goes down, or you reboot your machine, having
someone acting as backup for you is useful.
(well, ok,
On 20-Oct-2009, at 17:03, Evan Platt wrote:
At 03:58 PM 10/20/2009, you wrote:
Domains cost about $10 a year. Static IP addresses depend on your
ISP.
Some are cheap, some are not, and some won't do it at all. However,
you do not have to have a static IP. You can use a service like DynDNS.org
At 03:58 PM 10/20/2009, you wrote:
Domains cost about $10 a year. Static IP addresses depend on your ISP.
Some are cheap, some are not, and some won't do it at all. However,
you do not have to have a static IP. You can use a service like
DynDNS.org , which I think is about $20/year (they have fr
On 20-Oct-2009, at 15:53, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 20 October 2009, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Sure you can, register your own domain name, get a static IP address,
setup your own mailserver. Lots of people do.
At how much annual cost for that,
Domains cost about $10 a year. Static IP ad
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 17:53 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Slightly off-topic interjection, though it may help other fetchmail
users.
> What can I use to replace fetchmail with then?
>
getmail
> Fetchmail has such an option according to the comments in .fetchmailrc, but
> the man page barely mentio
On Tuesday 20 October 2009, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Tuesday 20 October 2009, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>>> Gene Heskett wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> Since your not the recipient mailserver, (your upstream server is) and
>>> I presume that your upstream is NOT running SA or doi
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:57:50 -0700
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> Now do you see why people don't use fetchmail, and why it's so
> important to 550 stuff that is sent from blacklisted servers,
> and to use blacklists?
That doesn't mean you need to run your own mail server. The world and
his wife use
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 16:49 +0200, klop...@gmx.de wrote:
> My predecessor said that emails with score > 6 but < 10 as spam
> characterized.
> emails with an score > 10 are deleted directly
That'd be MailScanner configuration, I assume.
> How can I adjust the score that it matches this rule
> http
On Tuesday 20 October 2009, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
[...]
>Since your not the recipient mailserver, (your upstream server is) and
>I presume that your upstream is NOT running SA or doing any filtering
>(otherwise you are effectively wearing 2 condoms, on on top of the
>other, a
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Luis campo wrote:
I have the problem that many SPAM emails being filtered to the mail box
users, who might that be?
what would be the problem that keeps coming in much spam our users, and
that he could do to catch any mail that has no distinction as a public
issue that i
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 19 October 2009, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
amadis wrote:
I usually think of myself as pretty capable with a computer but
Spamassassin and it's website have made me think twice. I took me 20
minutes just to figure out where this forum was. I feel like Apache is
trying
20.10.2009 18:43, RW kirjoitti:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:12:21 +0300
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> 20.10.2009 17:27, RW kirjoitti:
>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:38:14 +0300
>>> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>>
I have tried to compile spamd for cygwin,
but could not make it. I would ha
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:12:21 +0300
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>
> 20.10.2009 17:27, RW kirjoitti:
> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:38:14 +0300
> > Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> >
> >> I have tried to compile spamd for cygwin,
> >> but could not make it. I would have used it as one spamd instance
> >> in
20.10.2009 17:44, McDonald, Dan kirjoitti:
>> whitelist_from *...@enerquimica.com
>
> whitelist_from should generally be avoided. find out if these senders
> have published an spf record, or use DKIM signing, then use
> whitelist_from_spf or whitelist_from_dkim instead of whitelist_from
>
IMO
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 14:23 +, Luis campo wrote:
> Dear Sirs,
>
> I have the problem that many SPAM emails being filtered to the mail
> box users, who might that be?
Guys, don't waste your breathe. Looks familiar?
http://markmail.org/thread/koiqiu7ijyso7rbn
Luis Campo and Jose Luis Marin
20.10.2009 17:27, RW kirjoitti:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:38:14 +0300
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>> I have tried to compile spamd for cygwin,
>> but could not make it. I would have used it as one spamd instance in
>> my LAN in addition to the working Linux ones,
>
> spamd is perl, it's spamc
Hello,
I use Cenots 5 with Postfix and SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 with clamav
In the directory /etc/MailScanner I have a spam.assassin.prefs.conf file.
I use also this list http://zmi.at/x/70_zmi_german.cf
My predecessor said that emails with score > 6 but < 10 as spam
characterized.
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 14:23 +, Luis campo wrote:
> Dear Sirs,
>
> I have the problem that many SPAM emails being filtered to the mail
> box users, who might that be?
>
> what would be the problem that keeps coming in much spam our users,
> and that he could do to catch any mail that has no
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
It is written for, and targeted at admins. SA is not a GUI application
aiming for users. It is not even intended to be run on a client machine
(even though it works), but a server.
Thanks God it's not a GUI. About users ...
...well, when at our
Luis campo wrote:
> *
> skip_rbl_checks 1
> *
RBL checks are quite useful. Why are you skipping them?
> *#Con esto evalua cada mensaje, se requiere un 5.0 para marcarlo como
> spam
> required_hits 3
> *
Spamassassin is designed to score spam at 5 points. If you lower this
score, you are riski
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:38:14 +0300
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
> SpamAssassin *is* extremely hard to get up and running, when one is
> using a Windows workstation without perl. Even with perl it is hard,
> as the spamd can not be put up with anything there is. I think even
> cygwin does not help
amadis schrieb:
> I usually think of myself as pretty capable with a computer but Spamassassin
> and it's website have made me think twice. I took me 20 minutes just to
> figure out where this forum was. I feel like Apache is trying to weed out
> dunderheads like me from using their product. I swea
20.10.2009 16:25, jp kirjoitti:
As an admin with two years of CS education... I think Spamassassin is one of
the easiest programs to get, install, etc.. The documentation on it's tests
is great. There's no voodoo like many anti-spam products.
Stopping spam is not simple, and there are no illus
As an admin with two years of CS education... I think Spamassassin is one of
the easiest programs to get, install, etc.. The documentation on it's tests
is great. There's no voodoo like many anti-spam products.
Stopping spam is not simple, and there are no illusions otherwise. SA doesn't
make i
28 matches
Mail list logo
