On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, John Hardin wrote:
System tasks, like automatic restart of spamd after running sa_update. If a
message it receiver during the brief window spamd is down, it may be passed
unscanned.
Ugh.
... if a message IS RECEIVED ...
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://w
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 19:08 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> Well. SpamAssassin does not have a Quarantine. Something in your
> system has, and that is what is calling the SpamAssassin.
>
I already told him that simscan is doing the quarantining. Thats
definite.
I'm also 98% certain that simscan
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Guillaume Gelle wrote:
Don't know what you mean by (?:) and backtracking tho, I'll double check
the wiki page about syntax ;)
Try this:
uri URI_GOOG_READER m;^https?://(?:www\.)?google[\.,]com/reader/;i
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 09:30 +0200, Guillaume Gelle wrote:
now, I'
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, jmunjr wrote:
Thanks Charles. Rats, I meant to say that the message sizes for these are as
small or smaller than other messages getting checked. In fact I don't
believe procmail even has a filesize limit(something I need to change).
Any other thoughts ?
If procmail invoke
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, jmunjr wrote:
The majority of email coming into my server (Centos5.2, postfix,
dovecot) gets scanned and get the "X-Spam-Status" inserted just fine by
spamassassin 3.2.4 but several get through with no spam header inserted.
Any reasons why?
Message size. How big are the
That's right, I should have remove the parenthese, they serve nothing here.
It's more in case of something comes later and add some "|" after reader, etc.
Don't know what you mean by (?:) and backtracking tho, I'll double check the
wiki page about syntax ;)
Thanks,
Guillaume
>
Thanks Charles. Rats, I meant to say that the message sizes for these are as
small or smaller than other messages getting checked. In fact I don't
believe procmail even has a filesize limit(something I need to change).
Any other thoughts ?
Thanks again
Charles Gregory wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, jmunjr wrote:
The majority of email coming into my server (Centos5.2, postfix, dovecot)
gets scanned and get the "X-Spam-Status" inserted just fine by spamassassin
3.2.4 but several get through with no spam header inserted.
The lack of header, by definition, means that spam
Hi I am new here. Thanks for the site and all the contributions you have all
made.
Read some of the posts but can't seem to figure this out.
The majority of email coming into my server (Centos5.2, postfix, dovecot)
gets scanned and get the "X-Spam-Status" inserted just fine by spamassassin
3.2.4
For HTML content, we can check the length with
eval:html_eval('length', '< 384')
but I don't see anything similar for body or rawbody. For my purposes, the
Content-Length from the spamc connection would do, but it doesn't seem to be
exposed.
I see at least two plugins looking at length:
Ima
> Hello
>
> if I restarted the spamd
>
You need more words when communicating ;)
Does this mean the report still does not show up, even if you restarted SA
after the setting?
Well. SpamAssassin does not have a Quarantine. Something in your system has,
and that is what is calling the SpamAssa
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:32:35 + (UTC)
ArtemGr wrote:
> Benny Pedersen junc.org> writes:
> > my former own mailhost have changed from spamassassin to dspam, less
> > work for him and his users, and definaly lees work for his low
> > budget quad xeon intel server with 6Gb ram and alot of
> > d
LuKreme wrote:
But that ID would simply be the vpopmail user, not the individual email
addresses that are in the MySQL map, right?
It maps to whatever username spamc is passed, or the *nix UID
spamassassin/spamc finds automatically. (I would *hope* you're using
spamd/spamc in an environment
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
>> Even given a server that has these things, I'm surprised they
>> have invented technology that can analyze a postfix install to
>> the degree needed for correct installation of their product with
>> no more than a single click. With tech like that, I can't
>> believe they
Hello
if I restarted the spamd
greetings
> From: ja...@iki.fi
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Report in header of SPAM emails
> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:58:58 +0300
>
> > dears Srs,
> >
> >
> > I have added the option report_safe 1, but the mail
> > deposited in
poifgh wrote:
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>> For auto-learning, the high and low scoring messages are fed to Bayes.
>> However, for an optimal setup, you should manually train Bayes on as
>> much of your (verified) ham and spam as possible. The more of your mail
>> stream Bayes sees, the better th
Benny Pedersen junc.org> writes:
> fuzzyocr stop scanning if spam score is over a limit, why scan
> ocr when spamassassin can do it without ocr ?
Good to know.
> it could maybe be a option to make spamassassin stop scanning in
> generic if spam score is high ?
>
> there is alot of plugins tha
to...@starbridge.org wrote:
> Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> > On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, "to...@starbridge.org" wrote
>
> >> I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody
> >> active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again:
> >> same result.
> > forget to sa-co
On fre 25 sep 2009 13:50:45 CEST, LuKreme wrote
How does a shared UID separate the individual accounts in the MySQL
map into individual IDs in the MySQL bayes?
it can only be done with unix users so far, eg have 2 unix users share one
id in spamassassin set same username in user_prefs
and thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, "to...@starbridge.org" wrote
>
>> I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody
>> active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again:
>> same result.
>
> forget
On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, "to...@starbridge.org" wrote
I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody
active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again: same
result.
forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ?
--
xpoint
On 25-Sep-2009, at 03:56, Mark Martinec wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
Other surprises are that DKIM is pretty useless and SPF_PASS is
actually a slight spam indicator.
Benny Pedersen wrote:
so without some whitelist_from_* dkim and spf will not be helpfull
Indeed. Score points should be kept close t
On 25-Sep-2009, at 03:14, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On fre 25 sep 2009 00:49:36 CEST, LuKreme wrote
Where that bayes_user let me store the email address for the MySQL/
postfixadmin users individually.
id is a map to bayes_vars where you find username for the id
But that ID would simply be the v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
i'm running SA 3.3.0 (3.3.0-alpha3-r808953) and i've some problem with
compiled rules.
sa-compile runs without errors, and SA seems to works fine when restarted.
But some body rules are now not detected.
exemple of simple body rule (for testing):
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 09:30 +0200, Guillaume Gelle wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> As usual, spammers improved and instead of receiving profiles|groups|
> personnal.yahoo.com links, now, I'm being hit with
> www.google.com/reader links.
> (ie : href=3D"http://www.google.com/reader/item/tag:google.com,2005
LuKreme wrote:
> Other surprises are that DKIM is pretty useless and SPF_PASS is
> actually a slight spam indicator.
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> so without some whitelist_from_* dkim and spf will not be helpfull
Indeed. Score points should be kept close to zero for rules
DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID and D
On fre 25 sep 2009 09:58:41 CEST, LuKreme wrote
Other surprises are that DKIM is pretty useless and SPF_PASS is
actually a slight spam indicator.
you miss the point, there is no USER_IN_*
so without some whitelist_from_* dkim and spf will not be helpfull
if it was so you will have gived spam
On fre 25 sep 2009 00:49:36 CEST, LuKreme wrote
Where that bayes_user let me store the email address for the
MySQL/postfixadmin users individually.
id is a map to bayes_vars where you find username for the id
that way more then one email user can share one id user in bayes
So, if I have us..
On tor 24 sep 2009 23:06:56 CEST, Jari Fredriksson wrote
Bayes tables do not have user id or user name,so I guess they are
meant for global: no per user bayes no.
CREATE TABLE `bayes_token` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL default '0',
`token` char(5) NOT NULL default '',
`spam_count` int(11) N
On tor 24 sep 2009 22:57:13 CEST, LuKreme wrote
Is there a write-up/how-to anyone's put together about setting up
bayes with MySQL?
please read some docs first
Is it possible to migrate existing bayes to MySQL,
this is well explained in docs how to use --backup --restore in
sa-learn --he
On Sep 24, 2009, at 7:44 PM, poifgh wrote:
For 101st mail, if the regex MEDICINE is unable to match the
obfuscated
text, then the mail would have a low score, but bayesian learner
would say,
seeing the words surrounding obfuscated text, that this mail is spam.
Essentially this is how it wor
Dear all,
As usual, spammers improved and instead of receiving
profiles|groups|personnal.yahoo.com links, now, I'm being hit with
www.google.com/reader links.
(ie : http://www.google.com/reader/item/tag:google.com,2005:reader/ite=m/69a282969886af5e";>Haste
to come)
I took the firts rule submi
32 matches
Mail list logo
