drkwc wrote:
> My "Why" is that I get 1,500-plus spams daily on some of my older domains.
One thing you should double check is that you are blocking all
dictionary attack e-mails. What I mean is that a certain percentage of
spams are making wild guesses at the particular recipient's e-mail
address
Jdow, you're pretty sophisticated with this. Afraid much of what you
described is beyond my skillset and/or patience for mastering at the moment.
> >Am wondering if I can have two different settings. One for auto delete
> and
> >another for marking and delivering emails?
>But why? And how woul
>> Is it possible to score particular words differently based on
>> recipient address?
>>
>> We have a postfix/maia mailguard/spamassassin setup here hosting
>> numerous domains.One particular domain holder (A school) wishes all
>> emails containing particular keywords to be blocked, however, som
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Jeremy Brooking wrote:
> Is it possible to score particular words differently based on
> recipient address?
>
> We have a postfix/maia mailguard/spamassassin setup here hosting
> numerous domains.One particular domain holder (A school) wishes all
> emails containing particula
Hi,
Is it possible to score particular words differently based on recipient address?
We have a postfix/maia mailguard/spamassassin setup here hosting numerous
domains.One particular domain holder (A school) wishes all emails containing
particular keywords to be blocked, however, some of those k
From: "jdow"
Sent: Tuesday, 2009/September/15 20:06
From: "drkwc"
Sent: Tuesday, 2009/September/15 17:33
New Spamassassin nb qs:
On the configuration panel, I have SpamAssassin set to mark as spam any
email scoring 5 or above.
Not within SpamAssassin.
I have a rule set in Outlook Expres
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 16:36 -0700, Bill Landry wrote:
Yes, the "buzz"ard has also displayed the same abusive nature under his
other email address many times in the past. He uses the same email client
(X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3), the same reference in his Message-Id
(
From: "drkwc"
Sent: Tuesday, 2009/September/15 17:33
New Spamassassin nb qs:
On the configuration panel, I have SpamAssassin set to mark as spam any
email scoring 5 or above.
Not within SpamAssassin.
I have a rule set in Outlook Express to route those to a SpamAssassin SPAM
folder.
That
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 16:36 -0700, Bill Landry wrote:
> Yes, the "buzz"ard has also displayed the same abusive nature under his
> other email address many times in the past. He uses the same email client
> (X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3), the same reference in his Message-Id
> (camel), and the same s
OK, thanks, John. It is cPanel. I'll contact my host and see if they can
answer.
Best,
kwc
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-auto-delete-emails-scoring-10-and-above%2C-yet-mark-as-spam-those-5-and-above--tp25463989p25464101.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mai
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, drkwc wrote:
On the configuration panel,
SpamAssassin _has_ no configuration panel. That is some third-party tool.
You will have to contact the support resource for whatever control panel
tool (possibly cpanel?) that you're using.
Sorry we can't help...
--
John Hardi
New Spamassassin nb qs:
On the configuration panel, I have SpamAssassin set to mark as spam any
email scoring 5 or above.
I have a rule set in Outlook Express to route those to a SpamAssassin SPAM
folder.
Now, I'm wondering, can I ALSO set the auto-delete function to delete -- at
server level -
Very helpful Rob McEwen. And thank you for the referral to Justin Mason's
piece.
--kwc
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/What-does-%22conservative%22-mean-vs-%22aggressive%22--tp25463445p25463790.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 18:34 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote:
>>> I had considered this, but another poster made the worthy point that
>>> the (ab)user in question was likely the sort to get another fake
>>> address
>>> just so they could keep posting their crud. Sometimes 'ignore them' is
>>> the
>
drkwc wrote:
> "conservative" means vs "aggressive".
"conservative" = setting a higher spam score threshold to ensure that LESS
legitimate mail mistakenly blocked, even if that means that more spam makes it
into the inbox
"aggressive" = setting a lower spam score threshold with a goal of blocki
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 18:34 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote:
>> I had considered this, but another poster made the worthy point that
>> the (ab)user in question was likely the sort to get another fake address
>> just so they could keep posting their crud. Sometimes 'ignore them' is
>> the
>> simples
NB user question:
I currently have the basic score set at the default 5. Not sure what
"conservative" means vs "aggressive". '5' is said to be rather aggressive. 8
or 10 is said to be more conservative and more appropriate for an ISP. Does
conservative, in this case mean -- as I'm thinking that i
On ons 16 sep 2009 01:08:30 CEST, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote
*Please*, everyone -- don't feed the trolls.
well i still can drink my beers alone :)
but it would be more fun to see the trolls dont have one
--
xpoint
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 18:34 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote:
> I had considered this, but another poster made the worthy point that
> the (ab)user in question was likely the sort to get another fake address
> just so they could keep posting their crud. Sometimes 'ignore them' is the
> simplest and b
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
See the List-Help header. A mail to users-help returns, among a lot of
other info, the users-owner address as a last resort. This will reach
the moderators. (Same with all ezmlm lists, btw.)
I had considered this, but another poster made the worth
Chris Arrendale wrote:
>
> I am running version 3.2.4 and interested to know if there are
> additional language packs for Spam Assassin such as German, Turkish,
> Chinese, etc.? If they are available, does anybody know where I can
> download them?
>
There are a few language packs that come with SA
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 14:10 -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
> At 01:59 PM 9/15/2009, you wrote:
>
> > Please feel free to directly ping the list owners or use some other
> > channel to quickly trigger the PMC's attention if need be. Rather than
> > just posting yet another message to an already crowded t
At 01:59 PM 9/15/2009, you wrote:
Please feel free to directly ping the list owners or use some other
channel to quickly trigger the PMC's attention if need be. Rather than
just posting yet another message to an already crowded thread. The
latter is exactly where your call for authority is much
Guys,
first of all, I personally *highly* welcome the community to step up
like you did in this case. There's no need to wait for the PMC to tell
some seriously mis-behaving subscriber to watch his language. Thanks for
that!
Oh, and just in case -- this is not about words, but meaning and
intenti
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> Using it with the Postfix pipe command makes it very slow. Have you considered
> using the Sendmail milter interface integrated in Postfix in combination with
> the SpamAssassin milter?
I haven't tried that - probably should be using that instead :)
Also one other thi
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> "The old non-lookup line works fine"
>
> spamc has no option -f
>
> How can that work fine?
>
> If the old line works fine, why do you try to raplace with a new line?
I noticed the extra "-f", and will remove it. The new line has the "-u"
option, since we're trying to
I've opened the:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6203
you can add your e-mail address as a CC if you want.
> is the dkim awl not solveing it in 3.3 ?
Only if a mail has a valid DKIM signature and the feature is enabled
( auto_whitelist_distinguish_signed 1 ) and AWL datab
I am running version 3.2.4 and interested to know if there are
additional language packs for Spam Assassin such as German, Turkish,
Chinese, etc.? If they are available, does anybody know where I can
download them?
Thanks for the help on this.
Chris Arrend
* Ryan Thoryk :
> Hi,
>
> We're rebuilding a mail server and are having some issues with SQL-based
> SA preference lookups. We're running Postfix 2.5.5 and SA 3.2.5 (Debian
> Lenny version) - here's our Postfix config from master.cf:
> spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
29 matches
Mail list logo
