On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 08:06 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> else fight sender forgies in mta, and only accept spf pass, if sender
> domain is not with spf record count how many ham mails is comming from
> this domain, if none, then domain blacklist this sender, open again if
> there is spf la
On tir 25 aug 2009 07:58:37 CEST, ram wrote
I am getting a lot of pill spams on the abuse@ ids
yes, spammers are ignorants, track sender ip, and whois network, block
in firewall
just make sure network is not dnswl or other ham ips in there ranges
else fight sender forgies in mta, and only
At 12:48 PM 8/24/2009, you wrote:
Lately I have been receiving quite a bit of spams that promote films
of the most indecent kind, involving persons of minor age. Examples
are here:
http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/spam009.txt
By looking at those messages, I would expect them to score higher on
th
Lately I have been receiving quite a bit of spams that promote films
of the most indecent kind, involving persons of minor age. Examples
are here:
http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/spam009.txt
By looking at those messages, I would expect them to score higher on
the spamminess scale. Would anyone com
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, John Hardin wrote:
I've noticed a possible pattern in the image spams. Could somebody who's
getting a lot of these and who is willing to test a ruleset that may
help contact me offlist?
Request closed, volunteers contacted. Thanks!
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:03:07 -0400
MySQL Student wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having difficulty catching spam with subjects that include "Home
> Depot $100 Gift Card" type of mail, and wondered if anyone had any
> ideas:
>
> http://pastebin.com/m57dc753b
>
> What rules exist that I might be missin
MySQL Student wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having difficulty catching spam with subjects that include "Home
> Depot $100 Gift Card" type of mail, and wondered if anyone had any
> ideas:
>
> http://pastebin.com/m57dc753b
>
> What rules exist that I might be missing? They don't seem to do well
> with bay
jdow wrote:
There is one rule, Ted. "If you modify a rule and break it, you get to
keep the pieces."
:-)
Unfortunately, there's too many out there who modify a rule and break it
and then don't realize it.
Ted
{^_-}
- Original Message - From: "Ted Mittelstaedt"
Sent: Thursday, 2009
LuKreme wrote:
On 21-Aug-2009, at 07:45, Dan Schaefer wrote:
Scored pretty high here. DCC and JMF-BLACK account for quite a bit, but
it would have scored 5.0 and been marked as spam even without them.
My required_score is 7.
Then you have absolutely no cause for complaint.
When the score
Folks:
I've noticed a possible pattern in the image spams. Could somebody who's
getting a lot of these and who is willing to test a ruleset that may help
contact me offlist?
Thanks.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:51:53 +0200
Toni Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've installed FuzzyOcr and "all" OCR programs that I could find,
> which apparently resulted in tesseract being chosen, but when I run
> "spamassassin -D " on a message containing image spam, I can only see
> that the FuzzyOcr
Hi Romain,
On Mon, 24.08.2009 at 13:25:33 +0200, Romain Dolbeau wrote:
> Normally all are being run. The default settig is to stop when one has
> returned a 'spam' status (i.e. it runs everything for 'ham').
ok.
> Check the detailed log of FuzzyOcr (not of SA) ; it's likely it's
> missing some
Toni Mueller wrote:
> I've installed FuzzyOcr and "all" OCR programs that I could find, which
> apparently resulted in tesseract being chosen,
Normally all are being run. The default settig is to stop when one has
returned a 'spam' status (i.e. it runs everything for 'ham').
> but when I run "s
Hi,
I've installed FuzzyOcr and "all" OCR programs that I could find, which
apparently resulted in tesseract being chosen, but when I run
"spamassassin -D " on a message containing image spam, I can only see
that the FuzzyOcr plugin is being called, that it creates it's
databases, but nothing els
14 matches
Mail list logo
