On 21-Aug-2009, at 07:45, Dan Schaefer wrote:
Scored pretty high here. DCC and JMF-BLACK account for quite a bit,
but
it would have scored 5.0 and been marked as spam even without them.
My required_score is 7.
Then you have absolutely no cause for complaint.
--
I have as much authority as
On 22-Aug-2009, at 11:53, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Ya I understand what you by not want to change this. I'll just a few
more
Kb, never more then 1MB on total.
OK, but keep in mind that the increase in processing time is not
linear. For example, scanning a 500K message might take four times as
> > Again, I've no idea what relevance that has to anything I've written.
> >
> > All I ever said in his thread was that I don't in general rate ISP mail
> > very highly, and that if an ISP blocks outgoing connections to port 25
> > you can still connect to a third-party server through either the
Mike,
> > > -> header L_TAB_IN_FROM From:raw =~ /^\t/m
>
> It turns out, Mark's variation is too aggressive. I'm seeing some FPs
> on mailing lists, which place separate the friendly name from the email
> address by \n\t:
>
>From: Joe User
>
Interesting.
> The pattern really n
On 8/6/09 11:44 PM, Henrik K wrote:
Pretty good here..
OVERALLSPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME
024942799550.238 0.000.00 (all messages)
0.676 2.7504 0.02880.990 0.000.01 T_TAB_IN_FROM
For some reason all the FPs appeared to come throu
> You can change the max message size i the way you launch spamc. BUT,
> you don't want to.
>
> No, really, you don't.
>
> Oh, fine, shoot yourself in the foot if you must.
>
> -s max_size, --max-size=max_size
> Set the maximum message size which will be sent to spamd
> -- a
On 22-Aug-2009, at 10:22, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Long time user of spamassassin (several years), but only now I noticed
something on my logs:
--
Aug 22 15:30:30 lira spamc[12201]: skipped message, greater than max
message
size (512000 bytes)
--
My question, where do I define this?
You can c
> On Sat 22 Aug 2009 06:56:53 PM CEST, Benny Pedersen wrote
> > On Sat 22 Aug 2009 06:22:49 PM CEST, Jorge Bastos wrote
> >> Aug 22 15:30:30 lira spamc[12201]: skipped message, greater than max
> message
> ^
> ups
>
> >> size (512000 bytes)
>
> limit is in spamd how t
On Sat 22 Aug 2009 06:56:53 PM CEST, Benny Pedersen wrote
On Sat 22 Aug 2009 06:22:49 PM CEST, Jorge Bastos wrote
Aug 22 15:30:30 lira spamc[12201]: skipped message, greater than max message
^
ups
size (512000 bytes)
limit is in spamd how to change see this in re
> On Sat 22 Aug 2009 06:22:49 PM CEST, Jorge Bastos wrote
> > Aug 22 15:30:30 lira spamc[12201]: skipped message, greater than max
> message
> > size (512000 bytes)
>
> how do you call spamassassin ?
>
> from amavisd, spamd, mailscanner, procmail ?
>
> spamassassin it self have no limit
Hum, s
On Sat 22 Aug 2009 06:22:49 PM CEST, Jorge Bastos wrote
Aug 22 15:30:30 lira spamc[12201]: skipped message, greater than max message
size (512000 bytes)
how do you call spamassassin ?
from amavisd, spamd, mailscanner, procmail ?
spamassassin it self have no limit
--
xpoint
On Sat 22 Aug 2009 03:58:18 PM CEST, John Hardin wrote
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:51:15 +1000 (EST), Res wrote:
for our customers, I dont care what other companies like that do,
they can accept mail on port 80 for all I care.
newer used webmail ?
Webma
Howdy prople,
Long time user of spamassassin (several years), but only now I noticed
something on my logs:
--
Aug 22 15:30:30 lira spamc[12201]: skipped message, greater than max message
size (512000 bytes)
--
My question, where do I define this?
/etc/default/spamassassin, doesn't ha
Hi,
On Fri, 21.08.2009 at 13:43:26 -0600, Karl Pearson
wrote:
> Nothing free is worth a cent.
this only goes to show that money isn't that much of a universal metric
as it's touted to be. If you've lost all other metrices, then I'm sorry
for you.
"Can't buy me love" (Beatles)
Kind regards
Hi,
although I missed out on the bulk of the discussion, I have to say this
to Ted's email:
On Fri, 21.08.2009 at 10:46:55 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> I agree. We're and ISP and I don't want us to be associated with
> companies like Google. I don't want Google operating in my market and
> RW wrote:
> The idea that I'm attacking you is just your paranoid fantasy.
>
RW,
there is a song in those last 4 words...
just need lyrics and a major recording star and you will be more wealthy !
- rh
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:51:15 +1000 (EST), Res wrote:
for our customers, I dont care what other companies like that do, they
can accept mail on port 80 for all I care.
newer used webmail ?
Webmail != inbound SMTP on port 80, Benny.
--
John Hardi
17 matches
Mail list logo
