well, you have half of it, as any hit shown here by invaluement was
missed by spamhaus. I can't give you the data for other cases because
it's a short circuit -> 550 type of thing.
That's not an ideal metric. You really need to test every incoming message
against each RBL (up to 4 or so, to av
MySQL Student wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thought "grep -c RAZOR2_CHECK" through my mail logs would give me a
> good approximation of the number of times RAZOR2 was consulted, but
> that doesn't seem to be the case. There are some mails that don't have
> it listed in the "tests=" section.
>
> I've also trie
is this DKIM-Reputation setup for any *general* current spamassassin
deployment or does it only work with certain MTA setups ???
i am asking because i believe what i saw was that Amavis was mentioned, and
nothing else.
TIA
- rh
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:28:01 -0400, MySQL Student
wrote:
> Any chance someone has a bit of time to hack on it on this lazy
> Saturday afternoon? :-)
http://www.mikecappella.com/logwatch/
--
Benny Pedersen
Hi,
I thought "grep -c RAZOR2_CHECK" through my mail logs would give me a
good approximation of the number of times RAZOR2 was consulted, but
that doesn't seem to be the case. There are some mails that don't have
it listed in the "tests=" section.
I've also tried the razor-* commands, and they do
Hi,
>> What log script do you good people use to generate the list above ? Is it
>> a home brew or one we can download so we can compare our own hits ?
>
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats.txt
Any chance someone knows where there is a compatible one that parses
amavisd instead of sp
Hi,
> Unknown user 32.00% (32.00%) 87427696
> Greylisted 24.88% (16.92%) 46225401
> Throttled 11.03% (5.64%) 15399444
> Relay access denied 0.01% (0.00%)
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 07:12:18AM -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
> At 02:56 AM 8/15/2009, you wrote:
>> How would I create a rule to match when a subject line begins /^Re: /i
>> but the message contains no References or In-Reply-To headers?
>
> Just FYI, I'm on a number of lists where different people
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:12:18 -0700, Evan Platt
wrote:
> At 02:56 AM 8/15/2009, you wrote:
>>How would I create a rule to match when a subject line begins /^Re:
>>/i but the message contains no References or In-Reply-To headers?
>
> Just FYI, I'm on a number of lists where different people insist
At 02:56 AM 8/15/2009, you wrote:
How would I create a rule to match when a subject line begins /^Re:
/i but the message contains no References or In-Reply-To headers?
Just FYI, I'm on a number of lists where different people insist on
starting their subject with RE: ... YMMV. :)
Henrik K wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 09:50:41AM +0200, Jorn Argelo wrote:
Henrik K wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 07:43:37PM +0200, Jorn Argelo wrote:
Hi All,
I'm running spamassassin 3.2.5 on RHEL 5.3 x86_64. We have three
boxes, and all three of them are sharing the s
How would I create a rule to match when a subject line begins /^Re: /i
but the message contains no References or In-Reply-To headers?
--
Mike Cardwell - IT Consultant and LAMP developer
Cardwell IT Ltd. (UK Reg'd Company #06920226) http://cardwellit.com/
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
>
> Loren Wilton wrote:
>> There is a standard template that gives the form of the report in the
>> mail message. I don't recall which cf file this is normally in, but
>> it sounds like that file is not being included in the cf files in your
>> configuration.
>>
>> I would
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Johnson, S wrote:
When I put in the email address of the user that was being sent these
survey offers for gift cards I got a message stating please allow 10
days for removal which makes me think they are not legit.
That's not necessarily the case. One
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:02:52AM +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> - "Marc Perkel" wrote:
> >
> >
> > Aaron Wolfe wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Chris Owen wrote:
>
> On Aug 14, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Mike Cardwell wrote:
>
> The comparisons on that page are useless. What mat
On 8/15/2009 11:02 AM, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
--
RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
--
1 URIBL_INVALUEMENT 2
- "Marc Perkel" wrote:
>
>
> Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Chris Owen wrote:
On Aug 14, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Mike Cardwell wrote:
The comparisons on that page are useless. What matters is list policy,
reliability and reputation.
SpamHaus is hands down the best d
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 09:50:41AM +0200, Jorn Argelo wrote:
> Henrik K wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 07:43:37PM +0200, Jorn Argelo wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I'm running spamassassin 3.2.5 on RHEL 5.3 x86_64. We have three
>>> boxes, and all three of them are sharing the same bayes DB
Henrik K wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 07:43:37PM +0200, Jorn Argelo wrote:
Hi All,
I'm running spamassassin 3.2.5 on RHEL 5.3 x86_64. We have three boxes,
and all three of them are sharing the same bayes DB using a MySQL
cluster, version 7.0.6 (based on 5.1.34). The cluster has 2 datan
19 matches
Mail list logo
