Good morning. The output of sa-learn --dump magic after bayes learning is +1
nspam/nham. I tried the command several. times. I tried write the mail with
Subject: viagra; body: viagra and sent it from my first account to the my
second account(score 0,4). Then I used sa-learn -spam for this mail. I
monolit wrote:
> Question is logical. When SA learnt new spam/ham so SA have to write new info
> to the database and I think that database have to increase size. If you have
> for example *.doc file and you modify it. You add several words - *.doc will
> be bigger(increase his size).
>
The datab
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 14:43 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
> To by Karsten Bräckelmann-2: I want to apologize for my approach - I use
> Ubuntu and other forums because I am hopeless because my homework was
> install configure and run antispam(spamassassin, ClamAV, Clamsmtp,razor,
> postfix)
To Benny Pedersen: I understand your explanation about increasing of
spamassassin database. Your example with md5 is clearly. Ok thank you very
much!
To by Karsten Bräckelmann-2: I want to apologize for my approach - I use
Ubuntu and other forums because I am hopeless because my homework was
inst
I'm starting to seriously wonder, what your homework actually is about.
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 13:05 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
> Your command works! I found in spamassassin -D razor2 < sample.msg 2>&1 |
> less message the following:
> check[9444]: [ 6] a=c&e=4&ep4=7542-10&s=4uO_brp
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 13:20:41 -0700 (PDT), monolit
wrote:
> Question is logical.
so are google :)
> When SA learnt new spam/ham so SA have to write new info
> to the database and I think that database have to increase size.
no, my bayes db is around 150M, but all my mail is in webmail at 800M so
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 11:53 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
> I have theory ...I know you will think thats bad but I tried explain how I
> understand SA documentation. When I set the "bayes_min_spam_num 1" so it
> means that Bayes learn system will be activate. And now for example: I got
As
Question is logical. When SA learnt new spam/ham so SA have to write new info
to the database and I think that database have to increase size. If you have
for example *.doc file and you modify it. You add several words - *.doc will
be bigger(increase his size).
--
View this message in context:
h
Your command works! I found in spamassassin -D razor2 < sample.msg 2>&1 |
less message the following:
check[9444]: [ 6] a=c&e=4&ep4=7542-10&s=4uO_brp3_KWEDuqMYXBVHI-4-FwA
But I dont know how to recognize that is a signature(hash) of the mail. In
the old version it was clearly marked for example
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 11:53:53 -0700 (PDT), monolit
wrote:
> What is strange when I use SA-LEARN so database dont expand the size, but
> the time of modification is the same when I sa-learn started.
question is ?
FROM SA WWW
bayes_min_ham_num (Default: 200)
bayes_min_spam_num (Default: 200)
To be accurate, the Bayes system does not activate until a certain
number of ham (non-spam) and spam have been learned. The default is 200 of
each ham and spam, but you can tune these up or down with these two
setti
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 11:17 -0700, monolit wrote:
> I understand that I must read whole output(message(TOP message)). But the
> output this command is very fast and it stop at the end. I dont catch TOP of
> message. I tried "| more" switch but it didint help. I tried redirecting
> output to the fil
I understand that I must read whole output(message(TOP message)). But the
output this command is very fast and it stop at the end. I dont catch TOP of
message. I tried "| more" switch but it didint help. I tried redirecting
output to the file but it doesnt work. The file was empty:( I dont know ho
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 18:31 +0100, RW wrote:
> > > AFAIK it doesn't affect autoleaning at all, bayes_min_spam_num &
> > > bayes_min_ham_num control when scoring starts.
> >
> > Well, it *does* nonetheless. *shrug*
> If you read back you'll see that that's consistent with what I wrote and
> the op
Getting kind of a headache, trying to wrap my head around this confusing
mess. Anyway, here's my shot at this.
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 03:31 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
> > > When I use spamassassin -t -D razor2 < /tmp/spam
> > > so I dont get the hash and so on but content analysis
> > >
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:15:52 +0200
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 02:00 +0100, RW wrote:
> > On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 01:42:21 +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > It's a counter-measure against bad learning, to force at least
> > > some MINIMAL manual training, before auto-lear
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 04:36 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
> I changed the value on "1"(I use this for testing and my self-learning its
> my homework). According to me - spam bayes learning was activated. When I
> use sa-learning so bayes learn that the mail is spam. And bayes learn the
> s
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 02:00 +0100, RW wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 01:42:21 +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > when I learn bayes by hand (sa-learn --spam --file mail) that this
> > > mail is spam? I have explicit set in local.cf bayes_min_spam_num 1.
> > > This means that for bayes is suffici
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 18:15 -0700, Stefan Malte Schumacher wrote:
> > Evidence that it's not working? Show us some SA headers. In this case, a
> > spam sample that triggered DCC, cause the Report header does show the
> > rule's score.
Hmm, I wasn't clear enough. :) I meant an identified spam, whe
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 04:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
monolit wrote:
>
> I changed the value on "1"(I use this for testing and my
> self-learning its my homework). According to me - spam bayes learning
> was activated. When I use sa-learning so bayes learn that the mail is
> spam. And bayes learn the signatu
I read spamassassin docs... I found out the following:
Sa-learn
--spam
Learn the input message(s) as spam. If you have previously learnt any of
the messages as ham, SpamAssassin will forget them first, then re-learn them
as spam. Alternatively, if you have previously learnt them as spam, it'll
Terry Carmen a écrit :
>> On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:33:40 -0400
>> "Terry Carmen" wrote:
>>
>>> The backscatter would not have been received, since the sender is on
>>> a number of RBLs.
>> It's the IP address of the botnet PC that's on the RBLs, the backscatter
>> doesn't come from there, it comes fr
I am really sorry it was mistake - I was yesterday very tired.
Back on-list. I'm not a personal help-line.
When I use spamassassin -t -D razor2 < /tmp/spam so I dont get the hash and
so on but content analysis
> > details...bayes clasification and so on. I expected message like
debug: Razor i
23 matches
Mail list logo
