Hi,
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:43:15PM +0200, alex k wrote:
>> Hi,
>> It seems that image spam is back. So I wrote a new OCR plugin for
>> spamassassin, which uses convert and ocrad to extract text.
>> For details and download see:
>>
>> http://spielwiese.la-evento.com/facileOCR/
>>
>> We use th
On 22-May-2009, at 06:14, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
- greylisting
I do this to great effect, but not for all servers (see below)
- rejecting broken HELO at smtp time (such as "MUMS_XP_BOX")
Yep, I reject a lot of messages based on helos
- rejecting dynamic IPS at smtp time (PBL)
I
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:43:15PM +0200, alex k wrote:
> Hi,
> It seems that image spam is back. So I wrote a new OCR plugin for
> spamassassin, which uses convert and ocrad to extract text.
> For details and download see:
>
> http://spielwiese.la-evento.com/facileOCR/
>
> We use this plugin on
- "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" schrieb:
>
> Are you sure you did not disable (or, did enable) network checks? Some
> of
> them have to be enabled, some need additional software installed
> (razor,
> pyzor, dcc)...
>
yes. I'm sure. As I wrote in my original posting on most of the emails the
My message below was rejected as spam:
:
140.211.11.136_failed_after_I_sent_the_message./Remote_host_said:_552_spam_score_(15.9)_exceeded_threshold/
So, I resend it with the queried domain name obfuscated.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: URIBL_BLACK not working?
Date: Sunday,
On 22-May-2009, at 11:10, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 08:41, LuKreme wrote:
dont whitelist *...@gmail, if you need to whitelist, do it with full
email addy
I don't whitelist gmail.
there was user in def wl if i remember it
There was:
* -3.3 USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL From: address
Hi,
> On 23.05.09 12:43, alex k wrote:
>> It seems that image spam is back. So I wrote a new OCR plugin for
>> spamassassin, which uses convert and ocrad to extract text.
>> For details and download see:
>>
>> http://spielwiese.la-evento.com/facileOCR/
>>
>> We use this plugin on our servers. It k
Sorry, quoting self.
> > > An interesting observation is, that the hitrate (in percent) in spam
> > > scoring < 15 is an order of magnitude higher than with high-scoring [1]
> > > spam. This is rare to find...
> That's limited to EmailBL hits, so the total of these hits equal 100%.
> For me that
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 11:26 -0500, Larry Nedry wrote:
> On 5/22/09 at 9:28 PM +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> >An interesting observation is, that the hitrate (in percent) in spam
> >scoring < 15 is an order of magnitude higher than with high-scoring [1]
> >spam. This is rare to find...
>
> My
On 23.05.09 12:43, alex k wrote:
> It seems that image spam is back. So I wrote a new OCR plugin for
> spamassassin, which uses convert and ocrad to extract text.
> For details and download see:
>
> http://spielwiese.la-evento.com/facileOCR/
>
> We use this plugin on our servers. It kicks out eve
> - "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" schrieb:
> > you apre probable one of "early recipients" in such cases - the spam
> > started spreading, IP was not listed in blacklists, checksums weren't in
> > *ZOR or DCC databases. I'm afraid only BAYES and other rules may catch
> > that...
On 23.05.09 12:44,
On 5/22/09 at 9:28 PM +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>An interesting observation is, that the hitrate (in percent) in spam
>scoring < 15 is an order of magnitude higher than with high-scoring [1]
>spam. This is rare to find...
My EMAILBL_TEST_LEM hitrate leans heavily toward the other end of the
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 07:06 +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> Thanks. And this is just a small scale test. If we used more domains, feeds,
> and submissions, it could be even nicer. ;-) Keep the reports coming in. It
> would be nice to also know how much of spam are generally from freemails, so
> FREEMAIL_
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 16:43 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> >
> > Those are not the total spam for the day but the cumulative spam from
> > one day to the next. Though the percentile if figured on the total
>
> Ah, yees. :) Thanks. I was missing the base before you enabled EmailBL.
> So tha
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 21:53 -0500, Chris wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 04:11 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Sorry, no. :) The dates and numbers don't match, unless you didn't get
> > any spam early this month.
> Is this what you're looking for:
> Starting point as of 13 May with plug-in
-Original Message-
From: Henrik K [mailto:h...@hege.li]
Sent: Fri 22-May-09 23:06
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Stats (was: The EmailBL test zone period has been extended toJuly
1st.)
>On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 09:28:55PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>> > The EmailBL
In an older episode (Saturday, 23. May 2009), alex k wrote:
> Hi,
> It seems that image spam is back. So I wrote a new OCR plugin for
> spamassassin, which uses convert and ocrad to extract text.
Thank you. It works out of the box (after installing ocrad) here on
Ubuntu 8.04.2 linux with SA 3.2.4
- "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" schrieb:
>
> you apre probable one of "early recipients" in such cases - the spam
> started
> spreading, IP was not listed in blacklists, checksums weren't in *ZOR
> or DCC
> databases. I'm afraid only BAYES and other rules may catch that...
>
thnx for your ans
Hi,
It seems that image spam is back. So I wrote a new OCR plugin for
spamassassin, which uses convert and ocrad to extract text.
For details and download see:
http://spielwiese.la-evento.com/facileOCR/
We use this plugin on our servers. It kicks out every image-spam, that
made it through the oth
19 matches
Mail list logo
