On lördagen den 18 april 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Sat, April 18, 2009 11:58, mouss wrote:
> > https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5859
> > please attach full headers to this ticket (feel free to obfuscate
> > private infos).
>
> subject seems imho bad in the way that it m
On 8-May-2009, at 09:12, Randy wrote:
They are wrong. A large volume spammer started about a 2 weeks ago.
This includes the *png spam and others I know are the same spammer
becuase it all started at once. Our spam levels are up 100%.
My spam for April was up about 50% (not delivered, but tot
On 8-May-2009, at 13:07, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
In the interest of LuKreme, and since he didn't clarify his (wrong)
claim, I'll just assume he mis-read the "90" prefix as the file
belonging to the default configuration -- which indeed would be bad to
edit.
Yep, that was it.
--
When the st
Charles Gregory a écrit :
> On Mon, 4 May 2009, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>> No, actually, 'exampleBETA.tld' is invalid.
>> (hint: without real domain names, no one can help you)
>
> I believe my descriptions are sufficiently precise that knowing the
> actual domain names is irrelevant. However, yo
