Hi,
I ran sa-update and nothing was wrong . After completing its work I run
"stat /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/" and show following results:
File: `/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/'
Size: 4096Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 directory
Device: 802h/2050d Inode: 8503299
On Monday 20 April 2009, alexus wrote:
>i'm trying to teach my SA whats spam
>
>it's a brand new out of box SA, i have few domains that i dont get
>anything but a spam and on the top seems like from same spamers as
>they "picked" emails that they thought would be good to spam and keep
>on spaming t
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:37 PM, alexus wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:01 PM, alexus wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Evan Platt wrote:
>>> At 07:20 PM 4/20/2009, you wrote:
i'm trying to teach my SA whats spam
it's a brand new out of box SA, i have few domai
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:01 PM, alexus wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Evan Platt wrote:
>> At 07:20 PM 4/20/2009, you wrote:
>>>
>>> i'm trying to teach my SA whats spam
>>>
>>> it's a brand new out of box SA, i have few domains that i dont get
>>> anything but a spam and on the top
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Evan Platt wrote:
> At 07:20 PM 4/20/2009, you wrote:
>>
>> i'm trying to teach my SA whats spam
>>
>> it's a brand new out of box SA, i have few domains that i dont get
>> anything but a spam and on the top seems like from same spamers as
>> they "picked" emails
At 07:20 PM 4/20/2009, you wrote:
i'm trying to teach my SA whats spam
it's a brand new out of box SA, i have few domains that i dont get
anything but a spam and on the top seems like from same spamers as
they "picked" emails that they thought would be good to spam and keep
on spaming them
so i
i'm trying to teach my SA whats spam
it's a brand new out of box SA, i have few domains that i dont get
anything but a spam and on the top seems like from same spamers as
they "picked" emails that they thought would be good to spam and keep
on spaming them
so i do sa-learn --spam *
after a while
Grr wrong...
If I use
|/usr/bin/formail -i Delivered-To: |/usr/bin/preline /usr/bin/procmail
Preline is arring the three TOP headers in the wrong sequence
> > Return-Path:
> >
> > Delivered-To: .ml4miche...@tamay-dogan.net
> > From debian-doc-requ...@lists.debian.org Mon Apr 20 01:
While investigating, I used now
|/usr/bin/formail -i Delivered-To: |/usr/bin/preline /usr/bin/procmail
And checked the first message comeing in...
There is a weird problem with formail because if I add/remove a header
with "-I" or "-i" it append it to the END of the Headers, but NOT, if
i
Am 2009-04-20 08:57:04, schrieb John Hardin:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
>> So now I have (according to Sam from the courier list) doen following:
>>
>> |/usr/bin/formail -I'Delivered-To: |/usr/bin/preline /usr/bin/procmail
>
> Unbalanced quotes.
This was a typo be me, since
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Michelle Konzack wrote:
So now I have (according to Sam from the courier list) doen following:
|/usr/bin/formail -I'Delivered-To: |/usr/bin/preline /usr/bin/procmail
Unbalanced quotes.
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.4 required=5.0 tests=CORRUPT_FROM_LINE_IN_HDRS,
That depends how you have SA setup and how you call it, which you
haven't explained. :)
If you're running it in a site-wide setup, and always with the same
user (even if it doesn't exist on the server), then I'd recommend
running spamd in debug mode and see what it says.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 05:47 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
> As you can see BAYES_.. is not present
>
> For example during one hour of mail SA work I have:
> 2500 messages with bayes BAYES_\d\d marked
> and
> 400 without
Which BAYES_xx rules do you get?
Any chance you customized some Ba
Hello,
I am using "courier", "procmail" and "spamassassin". In my ~/.corier
file I have had the line:
|/usr/bin/preline /usr/bin/procmail
which is working fine, except, that I get multiple header of
Delivered-To: Which is for some of my tools undesired since I need only
the on
If user would be missing, it would always cause problems. But it works 75% of
the time.
Mark
Theo Van Dinter-2 wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:47 AM, m.b wrote:
>> scantime=3.2,size=2745,user=(unknown),uid=104,required_score=5.0,rhost=,raddr=..,rport=57786,mid=
>>
>>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:47 AM, m.b wrote:
> scantime=3.2,size=2745,user=(unknown),uid=104,required_score=5.0,rhost=,raddr=..,rport=57786,mid=
>
> Do you have any suggestions why not every message is passing through BAYESS?
> I thought it is was locking problem but I'am using
Hello,
I have following problem:
>From time to time some messages are not check by bayes filter.
For example:
Apr 20 12:59:58 . spamd[10405]: spamd: result: Y 25 -
FH_HELO_ALMOST_IP,HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_XBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB
17 matches
Mail list logo
