On 4/15/09 at 10:30 AM -0400 Rick Macdougall wrote:
>Normal sa-update && sa-compile takes about 2 minutes here.
>If I add JM's saught rules it takes over 30 minutes.
Here's another data point. With JM's sought and sought-fraud rules the
compile takes less than 7 minutes on a server running an Int
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Rick Macdougall wrote:
jp wrote:
It only takes a minute or three on my systems depending on load. 21 seconds
on a zero load dual core virtual machine with 2gb ram.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 08:56:22AM +1000, Res wrote:
Is there a method of speeding this beast up? I can buil
On Wed, April 15, 2009 15:27, Amon Werner wrote:
> Thanks for your response, i have solved the problem.
> It was a very very ugly error, because the new spamd is now located in
> /usr/local/bin and my startscipt started the old binary in /usr/bin.
>
> It works fine now.
fine as in you now have 2
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 17:31 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > Is there a method of speeding this beast up? I can build four entire
> > kernels and their modules from scratch in the same time it takes this
> > thing to compile (45mins) is it really worth using this method?
> > Last time I tried wi
> Is there a method of speeding this beast up? I can build four entire
> kernels and their modules from scratch in the same time it takes this
> thing to compile (45mins) is it really worth using this method?
> Last time I tried without it, I noticed next to no difference, opinions?
>
Same here, s
I think this was Richi Jennings (http://richi.co.uk/) and McAfee.
maybe some MFE staff on the list might comment? ;)
--j.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 15:22, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> Interesting
> article http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16951-spam-tramples-environment-with-huge-carbon-footprint
jp wrote:
It only takes a minute or three on my systems depending on load. 21
seconds on a zero load dual core virtual machine with 2gb ram.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 08:56:22AM +1000, Res wrote:
Is there a method of speeding this beast up? I can build four entire
kernels and their modules from
It only takes a minute or three on my systems depending on load. 21
seconds on a zero load dual core virtual machine with 2gb ram.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 08:56:22AM +1000, Res wrote:
> Is there a method of speeding this beast up? I can build four entire
> kernels and their modules from scratch
Interesting article
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16951-spam-tramples-environment-with-huge-carbon-footprint.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=online-news
I wonder how they figure out the transmission costs are are doing something
clever with the amount of power used by the routers vs %age of all int
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Matt Kettler [mailto:mkettler...@verizon.net]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. April 2009 14:52
An: Amon Werner
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Error with SPF Plugin
Amon Werner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have updated to Spamassassin 3.2.5, i am usin
Amon Werner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have updated to Spamassassin 3.2.5, i am using qmail and with
> qmail-spamc, it worked fine since today.
>
> Now I become following errors in the mail.log:
>
>
>
> Apr 15 10:22:20 shiva qmail-smtpd: 1239783740.220972
> Accept::RCPT::Recipients_Rcptto: P:ESMT
Hi,
I have updated to Spamassassin 3.2.5, i am using qmail and with qmail-spamc, it
worked fine since today.
Now I become following errors in the mail.log:
Apr 15 10:22:20 shiva qmail-smtpd: 1239783740.220972
Accept::RCPT::Recipients_Rcptto: P:ESMTP S:72.14.220.155:unknown
H:fg-out-1718
12 matches
Mail list logo
