alexus wrote:
> I keep getting this line in my logs everytime there is a spamd calles
>
> Apr 8 03:55:15 mx1 spamd[36109]: Use of uninitialized value $dir in
> scalar chomp at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 2118, line 2.
>
> i dont suppose this is normal
>
Are you using the -v parameter when you st
I keep getting this line in my logs everytime there is a spamd calles
Apr 8 03:55:15 mx1 spamd[36109]: Use of uninitialized value $dir in
scalar chomp at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 2118, line 2.
i dont suppose this is normal
--
http://alexus.org/
> > MailServer:~/spamassassin# spamassassin -D dns -t > [27256] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
> > [27256] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.61
>
> You might want to fire up CPAN and upgrade Net::DNS.
[choke]. The last time I used CPAN for upgrading anything on this box,
it broke Spa
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
I have done this, and appear to have quite a nominal time for those checks:
MailServer:~/spamassassin# spamassassin -D dns -t
You might want to fire up CPAN and upgrade Net::DNS.
Now.. Meat.. Sorry about the address rewrites.. Been told by the bo
> -Original Message-
> From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 April 2009 11:31 a.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 20_dnsbl_tests.cf
>
> On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 11:09 +1200, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Does
Hello Dave,
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Koontz [mailto:dkoo...@mbc.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 April 2009 11:34 a.m.
> To: Michael Hutchinson
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 20_dnsbl_tests.cf
>
> Michael Hutchinson wrote ... (4/7/2009 7:09 PM):
> > I have made some
Hello Matt, thanks for the response.
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:mkettler...@verizon.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 April 2009 11:26 a.m.
> To: Michael Hutchinson
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 20_dnsbl_tests.cf
>
> Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> > Hello
Michael Hutchinson wrote ... (4/7/2009 7:09 PM):
> I have made some changes to my SA 3.1.7 20_dnsbl_tests.cf when I
> compared it to the 3.2.5 release. I basically just removed 2 DNSBL
> lookups that are redundant. This is done in attempt to solve an issue
> random scan times of 30 seconds plus.
Wh
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 11:09 +1200, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Does anyone know of a way to perform individual debug tests on the
> DNSBL's listed in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf? In essence I need to see failures
> and/or timeouts.
spamassassin -D. In particular, I believe -D dns should
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Does anyone know of a way to perform individual debug tests on the
> DNSBL's listed in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf? In essence I need to see failures
> and/or timeouts.
>
> I have made some changes to my SA 3.1.7 20_dnsbl_tests.cf when I
> compared it to the 3.
Hello everyone,
Does anyone know of a way to perform individual debug tests on the
DNSBL's listed in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf? In essence I need to see failures
and/or timeouts.
I have made some changes to my SA 3.1.7 20_dnsbl_tests.cf when I
compared it to the 3.2.5 release. I basically just removed 2
LuKreme wrote:
> How about the 3rd post that exposes barracuda as a money-grubbing
> racketeering operation?
> "Barracuda own and operate emailreg.org, although there is no mention
> of this on the emailreg.org site, and the whois data is obscured.
> Indeed the owners of emailreg.org have gone to a
On 7-Apr-2009, at 13:30, Steve Bertrand wrote:
...apparently, not enough trouble:
Yep, they were found out via DNS. It is Their whois data that is
obfuscated
Domain Name:EMAILREG.ORG
Created On:12-Apr-2008 21:40:49 UTC
Last Updated On:02-Apr-2009 18:45:33 UTC
Expiration Date:12-Apr-2010 21
On 7-Apr-2009, at 08:39, Rob McEwen wrote:
Mark wrote:
I've been reading up a bit on Barracuda et al, like:
http://www.email-ethics.com/2009/01/emailregorg-project.html
http://zacharyozer.blogspot.com/2008/10/worst-engineers-ever.html
http://www.debian-administration.org/users/simonw/weblog/295
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Jeff Rice wrote:
I'm wondering about the best training strategy for the bayes engine.
Most bayes classifiers seem to recommend that spam/ham be fed in either
alternating or random. SA seems to suggest that all of one type be
trained, and then all of the other type. In my
Hi,
I'm wondering about the best training strategy for the bayes engine.
Most bayes classifiers seem to recommend that spam/ham be fed in either
alternating or random. SA seems to suggest that all of one type be
trained, and then all of the other type. In my experience with other
programs (
>
> Maybe they don't have the $25 or something
>
>
> ;-)
>
> --
> Neil Schwartzman
...would hope they have some money...
i found out about a nice family on the cabletv list and i was checking out
this guy and his wife that (if i recall correctly) were cable company people
making good money
Am 07. Apr 2009 um 01:52 CEST schrieb Adam Katz:
> Here's a syntax file I created for Vim to highlight SpamAssassin
> config files (see attached).
Thanks
> augroup filetypedetect
> au BufRead,BufNewFile *.cf setfiletype spamassassin
> augroup END
I change this to:
,
| ugroup filetyped
Mark wrote:
> I've been reading up a bit on Barracuda et al, like:
>
> http://www.email-ethics.com/2009/01/emailregorg-project.html
> http://zacharyozer.blogspot.com/2008/10/worst-engineers-ever.html
> http://www.debian-administration.org/users/simonw/weblog/295
>
> And now I'm even more convinced
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Hepworth [mailto:max...@gmail.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 31 maart 2009 20:56
> To: hlug090...@buzzhost.co.uk
> Cc: Rejaine Monteiro; Spamassassin list
> Subject: Re: zen.spamhaus.org
>
> > When someone tells me 'their' list is much more aggressive than
> > spam
Hi,
I'm currently working on a spamassassin plugin, which shall be able
to dynamically raise the score, as described on [1] below
"Writing plugins with dynamic score rules". However for
some reasons the plugin needs to run on a spamassassin 3.1.7 which does
not support calling the got_hit function
21 matches
Mail list logo
