Re: SA: user_prefs contains required 4.97,

2009-04-03 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Dennis German wrote: I have had required_score 3.97 since 4/1/09 but spamassassin email says X-Spam-Report: ... Content analysis details: (18.4 points, 4.0 required) also MISSING_DATE 3.0 should be 2.97 and MISSING_MID 3.0 should be 2.97 I h

SA: user_prefs contains required 4.97,

2009-04-03 Thread Dennis German
I have had required_score 3.97 since 4/1/09 but spamassassin email says X-Spam-Report: ... Content analysis details: (18.4 points, 4.0 required) also MISSING_DATE 3.0 should be 2.97 and MISSING_MID 3.0 should be 2.97 I had these values several days ago! Any i

Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin

2009-04-03 Thread mouss
RW a écrit : > On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:12:17 +0200 (CEST) > "Benny Pedersen" wrote: > >> On Fri, April 3, 2009 00:31, Mike Bostock wrote: >>> Noted the stuff about OpenDNS being "not a proper DNS" and, as I >>> have squid set up but not in use, I may just point squid at it >>> and go back to using

Re: RFC's suck

2009-04-03 Thread Nix
On 30 Mar 2009, Kenneth Porter spake thusly: >> It's a good overview of how broken the RFCs are, with an extra helping >> of zombie humour on top. Worth a look if you have an hour to spare, >> though some of the slides are a bit blurry. s/a bit blurry/completely unreadable/ Are the slides themse

RE: Compiling re2c with gcc 2.95

2009-04-03 Thread Mark
-Original Message- From: Nix [mailto:n...@esperi.org.uk] Sent: vrijdag 3 april 2009 15:42 To: Mark Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Compiling re2c with gcc 2.95 On 2 Apr 2009, Mark uttered the following: > > Has anyone been able to compile re2c with a gcc 2.95 compiler? I >

Re: RFC's suck

2009-04-03 Thread Bob Proulx
John Rudd wrote: > There are some interesting thoughts here about how to solve email's > problems ... but I'd like to put forward some thoughts... Thank you for sharing your insightful and well considered ideas. If this were one of those new-fangled web 2.0 social networking sites I would "mod it

Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin

2009-04-03 Thread Jari Fredriksson
> On 4/2/2009 10:34 PM, Mike Bostock wrote: >> >> If anyone can point me in the direction of some >> assistance I would be very grateful. >> > > http://forums.opendns.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=3423&page=1 http://www.opendns.com/support/article/33

Re: question please (RelayCountry plugin)

2009-04-03 Thread Gary
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 03:39:49PM +0200 or thereabouts, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 23:43 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > > Gary wrote: thanks guys, perfect information. > > > curious, is there any way to add a header showing the RelayCountries? Any > > > help would be appr

Re: Compiling re2c with gcc 2.95

2009-04-03 Thread Nix
On 2 Apr 2009, Mark uttered the following: > Has anyone been able to compile re2c with a gcc 2.95 compiler? I have a > gcc43 also, but Perl was compiled with 2.95, so the Rule2XSBody stuff > needs to be compiled with 2.95, too, right? Not really, no. The C ABI doesn't change much (or at all), cer

Re: question please (RelayCountry plugin)

2009-04-03 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 23:43 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > Gary wrote: > > curious, is there any way to add a header showing the RelayCountries? Any > > help would be appreciated. > > In reasonably recent versions of SA: > > add_header all Relay-Country _RELAYCOUNTRY_ Yup. Unfortunately, the POD

UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY and uuencoding

2009-04-03 Thread McDonald, Dan
Is it worth opening a bug on making uuencoded messages work properly? Textcat apparently thought a message was Japanese instead of a uuencoded .csv file: [22957] dbg: message: MIME PARSER START [22957] dbg: message: parsing normal part [22957] dbg: message:

Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin

2009-04-03 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Hi! Personally I wouldn't use OpenDNS on a server (except maybe for squid). It's not a normal DNS server, it does things that are aimed at browsers like spelling correction, and redirecting failures to it's own web servers. The latter presumably breaks the NO_DNS_FOR_FROM test, and I wouldn't be