On 18-Mar-2009, at 21:34, Jorge Cardona wrote:
¿Qué tiene que ver Software Libre con educación?
Esta lista es solamente ingles.
--
Advance and attack! Attack and destroy! Destroy and rejoice!
>>> Michael Scheidell wrote:
than trys to load a binary:
ref="http://www.spamcom.com.br/CartadeAmor.exe";
both files still exist on the hosts, and neither was
identified by clamav, and neither triggered any ET
(snort) rules, SA didn't trigger any rules ex
¿Qué tiene que ver Software Libre con educación?
Más tarde o más temprano, la computadora va a pasar a formar parte del
herramental educativo. Una vez que se haya asentado el polvo levantado por
los profetas de la panacea electrónica, que pretenden resolver dificultades
estructurales del sistema e
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, dsh979 wrote:
I have found that when I add manually a user to the whitelist (in the
SpamAssassin user preferences file) I get inconsistent results:
...
I have also found that when I manually a user to the blacklist (in the
SpamAssassin user preferences file) I get the foll
From: Matt Kettler
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:49:53 -0400
Jeff Mincy wrote:
>From: Matt Kettler
>Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:30:02 -0400
>
>fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> instead of disabling a lot possibly set message headers
Jeff Mincy wrote:
>From: Matt Kettler
>Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:30:02 -0400
>
>fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> instead of disabling a lot possibly set message headers using
>> "bayes_ignore_header" and ending up in strange configs like:
>>
>> bay
Bryan Lee a écrit :
> I'm a new administrator at a site and have been tasked with updating
> Spam Assassin, something I have never worked with before.
>
> I am running /usr/perl5/5.8.4/bin/sa-update daily as a cronjob, but I'm
> not sure if this is accomplishing anything.
> I have read through FAQ
RobertH a écrit :
>
>
>>> http://pastebin.com/m2fcbe7b5
>> Thanks for posting the sample.
>>
>>
>> My email sanitizer successfuly defends against this attack.
>>
>>
>> :)
>>
>> --
>> John Hardin
>
> no disrespect intended yet i would like to understand...
>
> u, if y
I am having trouble with the standard "White List" & "BlackList"
configuration in the SpamAssassin user preferences file.
The "Manual White List" user guide at
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ManualWhitelist
states "Adding a user to your whitelist gives them a -100 score, which has
the effec
> >
> > http://pastebin.com/m2fcbe7b5
>
> Thanks for posting the sample.
>
>
> My email sanitizer successfuly defends against this attack.
>
>
> :)
>
> --
> John Hardin
no disrespect intended yet i would like to understand...
u, if your "email sanitizer" caught i
I'm a new administrator at a site and have been tasked with updating
Spam Assassin, something I have never worked with before.
I am running /usr/perl5/5.8.4/bin/sa-update daily as a cronjob, but I'm
not sure if this is accomplishing anything.
I have read through FAQs and documentation, but haven't
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 March 2009 10:17 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: JoeJobbed - Vbounce plugin - SPF?.
On 17.03.09 14:02, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
>> I'm running Spamassassin 3.1.7, with netqmai
>>
>> Michael Scheidell wrote:
>> > just saw this one in email. terra.com/ spamcop.com./br are hosting
>> > trojans.
>> > but this email uses flash to load this:
>> >
>> > http://www.terra.com.br/cartoes/datas/amor.swf";>
>> > (which redirects to http://cartoes.terra.com.br/datas/amor.swf )
>>
Dan,
> I normally disable bayes, because without proper training it tends to make
> spamassassin less reliable. But I've got one installation that is
> stubbornly running bayes even though I have disabled it.
>
> I set use_bayes 0 in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
> I set use_bayes 0 in ~/.spama
From: Greg Troxel
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:33:31 -0400
Jeff Mincy writes:
>From: Matt Kettler
>Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:30:02 -0400
>
>> shouldn't SpamAssassins bayes mechanism just ignore the complete
>> message header and just look at the body?
John Hardin wrote:
My email sanitizer successfuly defends against this attack.
:)
mine did too... but it quarantined it in my 'this was only stopped due
to custom rules, maybe SA group would like to see it' pile.
and, didn't see any SA rules (or SARES rules) except those given.
--
Mic
Jeff Mincy writes:
>From: Matt Kettler
>Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:30:02 -0400
>
>> shouldn't SpamAssassins bayes mechanism just ignore the complete
>> message header and just look at the body?
>> This seems useful in my opinion.
>It seems like a very misguided idea to me
From: Matt Kettler
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:30:02 -0400
fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
> Hello,
>
> instead of disabling a lot possibly set message headers using
> "bayes_ignore_header" and ending up in strange configs like:
>
> bayes_ignore_header Return-Path
...
I normally disable bayes, because without proper training it tends to make
spamassassin less reliable. But I've got one installation that is stubbornly
running bayes even though I have disabled it.
I set use_bayes 0 in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
I set use_bayes 0 in ~/.spamassassin/user_pr
On 18-Mar-2009, at 12:07, John Hardin wrote:
It's intended to allow an occasional spammy-looking message from a
historically hammy correspondent to get through, hence "auto
whitelist".
Well, it works just as well to prevent the occasional hammy message
from getting through from a spammy c
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Georgy Goshin wrote:
6.6 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
another:
9.0 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
and another:
7.7 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
What is AWL r
I understood the spelling of AWL, but why the scores is different? How to
tune them?
G.
- Original Message -
From: "Ralf Hildebrandt"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: What is AWL?
* Georgy Goshin :
7.7 AWLAWL: From: address is in the a
* Georgy Goshin :
> 7.7 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
>
>
>
> What is AWL rule? Why it gives so different amount of points? How to
> resolve this?
AutoWhiteList
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Michael Scheidell wrote:
both files still exist on the hosts, and neither was identified by
clamav, and neither triggered any ET (snort) rules, SA didn't trigger
any rules except these:
HTML_EMBEDS=0.056, HTML_EXTRA_CLOSE=2.809,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 21:32 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > ram across this bug posting about a rumored problem with freebsd,
> > amd64 and spamassassin.
> >
> > trying to follow the bug url, got 'you are not allowed to view this bug'
FWIW, this bug is not made public du
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 08:00 +0100, fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
> > Is there any reason to think headers make bad tokens?
>
> For example the "X-Spam-Flag: NO" can cause Problems if you don't
> remove it before parsing and don't set it yourself. (You'll never do
> that an
Thanks for your reply, I'll check my local.cf & amavisd.conf.
Have a nice day =)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/I-think-SpamAssassin-does-not-check-every-mails-tp22576920p22579097.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Michael Scheidell wrote:
just saw this one in email. terra.com/ spamcop.com./br are hosting
trojans.
but this email uses flash to load this:
http://www.terra.com.br/cartoes/datas/amor.swf";>
(which redirects to http://cartoes.terra.com.br/datas/amor.swf )
than trys to load a binary:
ref="htt
John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>> SA extensively parses the headers. It parses *all* headers, even
>> nonstandard ones that I could randomly configure a server to add like
>> "X-Matts-funky-header: Hi!".
>
> If at a later date you add a header to the ignore list, do
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Matt Kettler wrote:
SA extensively parses the headers. It parses *all* headers, even
nonstandard ones that I could randomly configure a server to add like
"X-Matts-funky-header: Hi!".
If at a later date you add a header to the ignore list, does Bayes
"forget" that it's pr
Sheeen,
> We have an amavisd/spamassassin/clamav gateway before our Exchange server.
> I've trained spamassassin with about 3500 hams / 3500 spams, it should work
> correctly, and I'm training it regularly.
> But we're receiving some spams yet.
>
> I've looked into the headers of spams received de
Hi all,
We have an amavisd/spamassassin/clamav gateway before our Exchange server.
I've trained spamassassin with about 3500 hams / 3500 spams, it should work
correctly, and I'm training it regularly.
But we're receiving some spams yet.
I've looked into the headers of spams received detected/und
just saw this one in email. terra.com/ spamcop.com./br are hosting trojans.
but this email uses flash to load this:
http://www.terra.com.br/cartoes/datas/amor.swf";>
(which redirects to http://cartoes.terra.com.br/datas/amor.swf )
than trys to load a binary:
ref="http://www.spamcom.com.br/Cart
Matt Kettler wrote:
fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
Hello,
instead of disabling a lot possibly set message headers using
"bayes_ignore_header" and ending up in strange configs like:
bayes_ignore_header Return-Path
bayes_ignore_header Received
bayes_ignore_header X-Spam-Flag
bayes_ignore_header X-
34 matches
Mail list logo
