hello,
does anybody knows, if rules on www.rulesemporium are available again?
To update the spamassassin rules.
greetings ralf
Hi,
I am running SA in a hosted environment where SA is the MX and it
scans the mails and forwards to real mail server. We have report spam
facility where users report spam that went through SA. I am not using
bayes as of now but want to start using. To train bayes we have enough
spam (via user's
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:41:21 -0500
Caleb Cushing wrote:
> On Monday 02 February 2009 15:23:34 wolfgang wrote:
> > My idea: try "...cur/*" instead of ".../cur" when calling sa-learn.
> > Thus it should learn each file in that directory IMHO.
>
> I've tried that too, the results are the same. also
On Mon, February 2, 2009 19:04, Greg Troxel wrote:
> I have removed my address from the whitelist and will keep an eye on
> how it gets back in.
AWL is not really a WHITELIST, but a score avanger, and it does a
fairly good job imho, unhappy with it change its conf not the data
it creates in db
p
In an older episode (Monday, 2. February 2009), Caleb Cushing wrote:
> On Monday 02 February 2009 15:23:34 wolfgang wrote:
> > My idea: try "...cur/*" instead of ".../cur" when calling sa-learn.
> > Thus it should learn each file in that directory IMHO.
>
> I've tried that too, the results are the
On Monday 02 February 2009 15:23:34 wolfgang wrote:
> My idea: try "...cur/*" instead of ".../cur" when calling sa-learn. Thus
> it should learn each file in that directory IMHO.
I've tried that too, the results are the same. also according to prior
conversation on this list both should work.
--
Hi,
In an older episode (Sunday, 1. February 2009), Caleb Cushing wrote:
> sa-learn -D --showdots --spam
> .kde4.2/share/apps/kmail/dimap/.1734756527.directory/.
> \[Gmail\].directory/Spam/
> cur/
> Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (0 message(s) examined)
> right now I've no idea why it's not ex
I forgot to say: I am running spamass-milter via postfix. I wonder if
the previous hop is getting lost during that process leading to ip=none.
milter support in postfix is not quite 100% there.
pgpoSsAeu4HIh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I am running spamassassin 3.2.5. I found one of my own messages filed
as spam. The message was not relayed - sent from gnus to postfix on the
mail server.
Here is the header and AWL info (with the hostname and my domain name
query-replaced, but otherwise unmunged). I have adjusted NO_RELAYS to
> Do people generally have good non-FP experience with BRBL? I am
> thinking of
> bumping up the score, but I get so much spam per day it is hard to
> check for
> FPs with it enabled. It seems like a great resource, will it be pushed
> out
> with "sa-update" soon? I believe it is enabled in svn,
Yes, it has been a problem as there are so many domains used. However..I
took everyone's earlier suggestions, including training Bayes against FN
snowshoe spam and adding the Barracuda RBL (BRBL), and this appears to
almost completely take care of the problem!! So far I have been able to
rem
11 matches
Mail list logo