On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:01:07AM -0600, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> I've been using the FreeMail.pm plugin to good effect, but I would like
> to expand it slightly.
>
> Currently it fires if the From: header contains a freemail address, or
> if the From: and Reply-to: headers contain different freema
Hi All,
Is there are central point for links or dissemination of 'best
practice' rules?
I freely admit this is my 1st port of call.
I'm wondering if there is a simple (i.e works for a muppet like me)
page that lists details of how to synch non sa-update rules. The
question is based on the sad an
Karsten Bräckelmann a écrit :
> On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 15:29 +, Arthur Dent wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:48:55PM +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
>>> I explained it slightly more detailed in Bug 6008.
>>> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6008
>> Ahhh.. I see (
Dave Pooser a écrit :
>> manual training on any FPs/FNs that were not correctly autolearned from is a
>> good idea.
>
> Also, it does no harm to re-learn messages that have already been learned,
> so it's perfectly acceptable to set up a cron job to learn the contents of a
> folder as spam and the
LuKreme wrote on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:43:15 -0700:
> Ah, right, I know that, but that wasn't the question.
No? I thought it was. Or at least in this area. see below.
> Converting shell users from mbox to Maildir is not trivial, as far as
> I know.
But you wrote your users are Maildir users.
>
On 27-Jan-2009, at 04:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
LuKreme wrote on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:17:25 -0700:
Second question is, can I use
formail -s to split the mbox up and feed one message at a time to sa-
learn? And if so, what is the syntax? sa-learn seems to want a file
No, it works fine on maildir
On Tue, January 27, 2009 15:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> What's the problem deriving that rule from the existing rules?
FREEMAIL_REPLYTO can only hit if FREEMAIL_FROM hit, so one cant make
meta for the reply-to
--
http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :)
Dan McDonald wrote on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:31:07 -0600:
> Nope. FREEMAIL_REPLYTO is only true if there is a FREEMAIL_FROM and the
> reply-to: header or the body contains a different freemail address. I
> want a rule to fire for FREEMAIL_REPLYTO even if the From: header does
> not contain a freema
On Tue, January 27, 2009 13:31, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> Nope. FREEMAIL_REPLYTO is only true if there is a FREEMAIL_FROM and
> the reply-to: header or the body contains a different freemail
> address.
add # before return in line 553 should be it as i read it, then it
olso check reply-to even if f
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 10:34 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Mon, January 26, 2009 18:01, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> > I would like to add a test that scores a From: not in the freemail
> > list, with a Reply-to: in the freemail list. Shouldn't be worth
> > much (maybe .5) but I think it will get eno
LuKreme wrote on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:17:25 -0700:
> Second question is, can I use
> formail -s to split the mbox up and feed one message at a time to sa-
> learn? And if so, what is the syntax? sa-learn seems to want a file
>
No, it works fine on maildirs, as a default.
and I just don't kn
On Mon, January 26, 2009 18:01, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> I would like to add a test that scores a From: not in the freemail
> list, with a Reply-to: in the freemail list. Shouldn't be worth
> much (maybe .5) but I think it will get enough to push some of
> these advance-fee scams over the top.
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
