Re: Spam hitting Bayes_99?

LuKreme wrote on Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:03:18 -0700: > > > Gotten a few like this in the last day or two. I have no idea why > they are hitting Bayes_99. I don't understand, what's the problem? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive I

Re: Some questions on sa-learn

On 19-Jan-2009, at 05:22, Simone Morandini wrote: Currently, I have "auto_learn 1" in my local.cf, and I set Er.. isn't it bayes_auto_learn 1 ?? -- Advance and attack! Attack and destroy! Destroy and rejoice!

Spam hitting Bayes_99?

Gotten a few like this in the last day or two. I have no idea why they are hitting Bayes_99. The account in question runs untagged spam through sa-learn pretty frequently (at least once a week, sometimes more). $ sa-learn --dump magic 0.000 0

Re: Some questions on sa-learn

Simone Morandini wrote on Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:15:13 -0800 (PST): > So, did you set "Rebuild Bayes Every = 0" in your MailScanner.conf? No, that is the default and I just leave it at that ;-) Is it > better if both this setting and the "bayes_auto_expire" in > spam.assassin.prefs.conf are set to

Re: excessive scan time

On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:47:24 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > When did you sa-update for last time? Ubuntu appears to install a cron.daily cron job which does this amongst other things. > How many processes are you running > in parallel? I have a pretty low volume system but I did jus

Re: Some questions on sa-learn

>I shut off "bayes_auto_expiry" and then do the forced expire at night. I don't control this from MS. You may want to up the expiry threshold to 500.000 or so (I think the default is 100.000). So, did you set "Rebuild Bayes Every = 0" in your MailScanner.conf? Is it better if both this setting

Re: excessive scan time

On 19.01.09 15:33, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > I'm running 3.2.4(-1ubuntu1) of spamassassin here and have been noticing > some excessive scan times. i.e.: > > Jan 18 19:07:28 linux spamd[30216]: spamd: result: Y 14 - > AWL,BAYES_99,DCC_CHECK,DIGEST_MULTIPLE,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_06,H

excessive scan time

I'm running 3.2.4(-1ubuntu1) of spamassassin here and have been noticing some excessive scan times. i.e.: Jan 18 19:07:28 linux spamd[30216]: spamd: result: Y 14 - AWL,BAYES_99,DCC_CHECK,DIGEST_MULTIPLE,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_06,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_3,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RAZ

Re: Spamassassin & dnsbl questions

On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 09:51 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > Rasmus Haslund wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Sorry if this seems like a stupid question but I am just trying to > > understand the config files better. > > > > For example these: > > > > header __RCVD_IN_NJABL eval:check_rbl('njabl', 'combine

Re: Spamassassin & dnsbl questions

Rasmus Haslund wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry if this seems like a stupid question but I am just trying to > understand the config files better. > > For example these: > > header __RCVD_IN_NJABL eval:check_rbl('njabl', 'combined.njabl.org.') > describe __RCVD_IN_NJABL Received via a relay in combine

Re: Some questions on sa-learn

Simone Morandini wrote on Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:22:55 -0800 (PST): > With this settings, is it good practice to schedule a daily "sa-learn > --force-expire" and, I shut off "bayes_auto_expiry" and then do the forced expire at night. I don't control this from MS. You may want to up the expiry thres

Spamassassin & dnsbl questions

Hi, Sorry if this seems like a stupid question but I am just trying to understand the config files better. For example these: header __RCVD_IN_NJABL eval:check_rbl('njabl', 'combined.njabl.org.') describe __RCVD_IN_NJABL Received via a relay in combined.njabl.org tflags __RCVD_IN_NJABL net

Re: Some questions on sa-learn

Hi, Simone Morandini wrote: Hi all, I faced some really annoying timeouts in the last few days (that have caused tons of spam to get through), but after having forced an expire with sa-learn, I noticed a really good improvement. I have anyway some questions on sa-learn: Actually, these are

Some questions on sa-learn

Hi all, I faced some really annoying timeouts in the last few days (that have caused tons of spam to get through), but after having forced an expire with sa-learn, I noticed a really good improvement. I have anyway some questions on sa-learn: Currently, I have "auto_learn 1" in my local.cf, an

Re: utf8

В Сбт, 17/01/2009 в 18:43 +0300, Sergey Kovalev пишет: > Bogun Dmitriy пишет: > > I have upgraded to 3.59(was 3.56). But it not help... it still not > > converting body and not match my test rule. I have tried with utf8, > > koi8-r, cp1251... all not working. But when I have disabled > > normal

Re: Spamassassin not scoring or modifying

On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 12:58 -0800, CyborgPrime wrote: > ..and you are only assuming I have not read the docs- In fact I read the docs > and setup the program myself, so I do know a bit about how it works. Still > doesn't answer my question. > You moron- is this your first time answering a questio