Re: Implementing SPF

2009-01-04 Thread Bijayant
Benny Pedersen wrote: > > > On Wed, December 31, 2008 06:29, Bijayant wrote: >> >> From all the discussions and reading all the replies in this thread >> I have understood many things like >> 1) We use smtp-auth for sending the mails. So, I can reject all >> mails which are not generating from

Re: TO: and FROM: line are the same.

2009-01-04 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Mon, January 5, 2009 03:45, mouss wrote: > I think it is wrong to focus on sender=rcpt. > "they" chose the sender... and i need to test from outside how good my whitelist_from works or even test that if my spf record is not strict to reject mail from 0.0.0.0/0 :)) the postfwd rule does test d

Re: stress??

2009-01-04 Thread Matt Kettler
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: > Yes, you are right > > > Im doing my test, I have bayes and net tests, how ever it is running > over a flash card with minimal I/O, so I guess dns will be a little > problem then. > > > Does SA has cache to remember last dns request for example? No. It would be sil

Re: stress??

2009-01-04 Thread Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
Yes, you are right Im doing my test, I have bayes and net tests, how ever it is running over a flash card with minimal I/O, so I guess dns will be a little problem then. Does SA has cache to remember last dns request for example? TIA On Sunday 04 January 2009 20:27:20 Matt Kettler wrote: > Lu

Re: TO: and FROM: line are the same.

2009-01-04 Thread mouss
Michael Hutchinson a écrit : > Hello, > > > > There was some discussion on this list a while back about catching Spam > that contains the same E-Mail address in the TO and FROM lines. I think > it was decided that this could not be done, for some reason. I just read > a post on the SARE mailing

Re: stress??

2009-01-04 Thread Matt Kettler
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: > Hi all, > > > what does do more stress to SA, > > > 5000 emails of 1k each one > > > or > > > 1000 eamils of 5k each one > > > TIA Depends on what you have enabled, and how fast your network/dns and disk I/O are. If you have network tests enabled, the 5000 emails

stress??

2009-01-04 Thread Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
Hi all, what does do more stress to SA, 5000 emails of 1k each one or 1000 eamils of 5k each one TIA

RE: TO: and FROM: line are the same.

2009-01-04 Thread Michael Hutchinson
I was just supplying info I found that related to an earlier discussion, that might be useful to some rule writers out there. I found it interesting that someone had discovered how to match TO and FROM in S.A. But yes, MTA level would be better. Sorry if I missed any archives that detailed succes

Re: TO: and FROM: line are the same.

2009-01-04 Thread Sahil Tandon
Matt Kettler wrote: > > There was some discussion on this list a while back about catching > > Spam that contains the same E-Mail address in the TO and FROM lines. I > > think it was decided that this could not be done, for some reason. > > > I don't know that anyone said it couldn't be done. It i

Re: It is useful to use sa-compile with spamd/c?

2009-01-04 Thread Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
Yes I did Thanx :-D On Sunday 04 January 2009 13:17:40 Duane Hill wrote: > On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > again me, with more doubts. I've setup SA with spamd-spamc daemon-client. > > I also I use sa-compile. does spamd takes advantaje of compiled rules

Re: TO: and FROM: line are the same.

2009-01-04 Thread Matt Kettler
Michael Hutchinson wrote: > > Hello, > > > > There was some discussion on this list a while back about catching > Spam that contains the same E-Mail address in the TO and FROM lines. I > think it was decided that this could not be done, for some reason. > I don't know that anyone said it couldn't

TO: and FROM: line are the same.

2009-01-04 Thread Michael Hutchinson
Hello, There was some discussion on this list a while back about catching Spam that contains the same E-Mail address in the TO and FROM lines. I think it was decided that this could not be done, for some reason. I just read a post on the SARE mailing list from Tom Brown containing some rules th

Re: It is useful to use sa-compile with spamd/c?

2009-01-04 Thread Duane Hill
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: Hi all, again me, with more doubts. I've setup SA with spamd-spamc daemon-client. I also I use sa-compile. does spamd takes advantaje of compiled rules or it is only for spamassassin executable. spamd sure does take advantage of compiled rul

Re: Test order

2009-01-04 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas > > I also agree clamav is more lightweight than SA. I run clamav-milter, (runs > > before spamass-milter). Since I don't want/need viruses nor phishes, I am > > happy to drop them. On 03.01.09 17:37, Bazooka Joe wrote: > I do it the exact o

It is useful to use sa-compile with spamd/c?

2009-01-04 Thread Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
Hi all, again me, with more doubts. I've setup SA with spamd-spamc daemon-client. I also I use sa-compile. does spamd takes advantaje of compiled rules or it is only for spamassassin executable. TIA LD