Justin Mason wrote:
Kai Schaetzl writes:
Sam Ami wrote on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:04:40 +1100:
people on the blog are posting issues witht his --channel
then stick to the default.
as I note in the comments on the blog post -- it seems likely
that the people having problems are using a bad
On Montag, 17. November 2008 McDonald, Dan wrote:
> You know, it's "that blog" [1]
> [1] http://comics.com/pearls_before_swine/2008-11-16/
Buahaha, you made my day! Thanks a lot.
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc- http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 01:18 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 11:04 +1100, Sam Ami wrote:
> > people on the blog are posting issues witht his --channel
>
> Now that is a reference. "The blog". That's a reliable and trustworthy
> source of information alright.
You know,
Kai Schaetzl writes:
> Sam Ami wrote on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:04:40 +1100:
>
> > people on the blog are posting issues witht his --channel
>
> then stick to the default.
>
as I note in the comments on the blog post -- it seems likely
that the people having problems are using a bad version of
Troy Settle wrote on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:33:10 -0500:
> I'm having a major problem with the bayes system. I cleared the bayes
> database and let it start re-learning. Once it kicked in, I again
> started getting false hits with BAYES_00=-2.599 on a great many spam/uce
> messages.
How did you
I'm having a major problem with the bayes system. I cleared the bayes
database and let it start re-learning. Once it kicked in, I again
started getting false hits with BAYES_00=-2.599 on a great many spam/uce
messages.
Can someone point me to some good reading material to better understand
Sam Ami wrote on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:04:40 +1100:
> people on the blog are posting issues witht his --channel
then stick to the default.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
> I have been using USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST to whitelist mails from google
> alerts
> It had been working fine , but last 2-3 days I see that these mails dont
> get an SPF-pass. Seems guys at google are using some other servers
whitelist_from_dkim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark
ram,
> Enabling dkim plugin, will it increase resource requirements on my
> server ? The SPF checks are just on the envelope/helo and ip .. so
> obviously must be much cheaper
If you have a recent version of SpamAssassin (3.2.4 or later)
and fairly recent version of Mail::DKIM (0.32) the computa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey Jake,
Thx for your reply. I got this same tip off-list (from Jonas
Eckerman). I liked
the idea and I have already done some successful testing of
centralized bayes-data
storage in a MySQL database.
We are using an SQL back-end for storing '
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 07:32 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Mon, November 17, 2008 05:48, ram wrote:
> > I have been using USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST to whitelist mails from google
> > alerts
> >
> > It had been working fine , but last 2-3 days I see that these mails dont
> > get an SPF-pass. Seems g
11 matches
Mail list logo
