On Mon, November 17, 2008 05:48, ram wrote:
> I have been using USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST to whitelist mails from google
> alerts
>
> It had been working fine , but last 2-3 days I see that these mails dont
> get an SPF-pass. Seems guys at google are using some other servers
>
Authentication-Results:
I have been using USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST to whitelist mails from google
alerts
It had been working fine , but last 2-3 days I see that these mails dont
get an SPF-pass. Seems guys at google are using some other servers
How can I report to them , The gmail/google alerts site does not have
any suc
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 11:04 +1100, Sam Ami wrote:
> people on the blog are posting issues witht his --channel
Now that is a reference. "The blog". That's a reliable and trustworthy
source of information alright.
BTW, which one are you referring to, the official update channel or
Justin's Soug
people on the blog are posting issues witht his --channel
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14.11.08 16:44, Sam Ami wrote:
>> is there a definitive "RELIABLE" sa-update channel i can use to auto
>> update our rules ?
>
> what do you mean
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 03:29:07PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
>
> Over at another post about Phishing[0], Brent suggested setting up
> hostkarma.junkemailfilter to my RBL list, which I have done... However
> it seems to hit a lot of spams giving them a -5 scoring. I've either got
> this configur
Over at another post about Phishing[0], Brent suggested setting up
hostkarma.junkemailfilter to my RBL list, which I have done... However
it seems to hit a lot of spams giving them a -5 scoring. I've either got
this configured backwards, or this isn't working very well because it
whitelists too mu
