Greetings fellow users,
from what I understand, the TVD_RCVD_IP and TVD_RCVD_IP4 rules are used
to determine when messages have been relayed via hosts without domain
names. As both of these are just regular expressions, this relies on the
various mail relays bothering to do the lookups.
My
Hello all,
here on the list is someone, which Mailserver bomb me with each message
I send here. Also this crapy server send out messages with NO FQDN in
the From: and the mailserver of my ISP is each time adding the FQDN of
the VSever. So, please can the owner or someone using the do
On 08.11.08 16:47, Neil wrote:
> Do you have any recommendations on scores for these rules?
I increased score of SPF_FAIL to 10. spfmilter usually crashes and this is
another way to implement spf checks for me :)
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wi
On 8 Nov 2008, at 16:41, mouss wrote:
Neil wrote:
[snip]
Content analysis details: (-6.1 points, 4.5 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
Neil wrote:
[snip]
Heh, thanks for helping me out with this.
Do you have any recommendations on scores for these rules?
I use the default scores for these.
Neil wrote:
[snip]
Content analysis details: (-6.1 points, 4.5 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
This is because SA list domain has an
On 8 Nov 2008, at 12:53, mouss wrote:
Neil wrote:
On 8 Nov 2008, at 07:40, mouss wrote:
Neil wrote:
But still; how can I know that SPF and DKIM checks are working?
copy _this_ message (the one you are reading now) to a file:
message.eml, then (assuming a Bourne shell, not a C shell), ru
For future reference, in the online Wiki on installing on Windows, there was a
new Environmental Variable created of RES_NAMESERVER with a value of the IP of
your DNS server: RES_NAMESERVER192.168.0.15
Changing this to the new IP of the Windows DNS server solved the issue of
sa-update calli
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fri, November 7, 2008 19:31, mouss wrote:
postmaster@
so Michell said she rejects mail from postmaster@ from specific clients.
http://rfc-ignorant.org/policy-postmaster.php
you cited rfci which is irrelevant here.
the rfci policy applies to postmaster as a recip
Neil wrote:
On 8 Nov 2008, at 07:40, mouss wrote:
Neil wrote:
But still; how can I know that SPF and DKIM checks are working?
copy _this_ message (the one you are reading now) to a file:
message.eml, then (assuming a Bourne shell, not a C shell), run
# spamassassin -D -t < message.eml 2
On 8 Nov 2008, at 07:40, mouss wrote:
Neil wrote:
But still; how can I know that SPF and DKIM checks are working?
copy _this_ message (the one you are reading now) to a file:
message.eml, then (assuming a Bourne shell, not a C shell), run
# spamassassin -D -t < message.eml 2>&1 | tee sa
Neil wrote:
But still; how can I know that SPF and DKIM checks are working?
copy _this_ message (the one you are reading now) to a file:
message.eml, then (assuming a Bourne shell, not a C shell), run
# spamassassin -D -t < message.eml 2>&1 | tee sa.out
and check sa.out for spf and dkim.
Here's a script I use to run sa-learn. How I manage mail is:
everything is in maildir for dovecot, delivered to via procmail
SA score >= 6 to /dev/null
SA score >= N to .spam.N for N in 1..5
other taggging from foo to .spam.foo
ham found in .spam.N filed back to INBOX
spam found in
13 matches
Mail list logo
