Andy Spiegl wrote:
[snip]
But I do agree with Karsten (or Guenther?) that we shouldn't raise the
score.
yes, vbounce does FP. Let's test:
nobody wrote:
> I will be on vacation from 1/2/2345 to 6/7/8901.
will vbounce tag this message?
But my problem is that I cannot explain to all of my u
On 2008-11-03, 13:02, Bob Kinney wrote:
> We set up server side filters for SPAM that users can enable or
> disable, is this something you could do in your environment?
Uhmmm...not easily I think.
We're using a combination of postfix and AMaViS.
I'd have to plug procmail inbetween somehow...
Than
RobertH wrote:
this looks for it, assigns some reasonable scores, and if (add your
favorite shortcut) bumps it up another 5.
uri ST_SPACES /\.spaces\.live\.com/$
score ST_SPACES 5 3 4 2
meta ST_SPACES_BUMP (ST_SPACES && (RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET ||
RCVD_IN_XBL
|| RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NE
Kelson wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
I guess it's a matter of opinion, but an email address is a significant
part of a corporate identity - you don't go around changing it ad-hoc,
and you certainly try to avoid having one domain in your email-address
and another on your brochures and businesscards.
Per Jessen wrote:
I guess it's a matter of opinion, but an email address is a significant
part of a corporate identity - you don't go around changing it ad-hoc,
and you certainly try to avoid having one domain in your email-address
and another on your brochures and businesscards.
Exactly. Tha
Uhmm... interesting. What exactly might cause this?
I tried to trigger this behaviour bouncing and forwarding mails from
different accounts but never saw the __BOUNCE_RPATH_NULL tag.
Might just be our mail server software. It's something we've worked around.
But I do agree with Karsten (or G
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 15:57 +0100, Andy Spiegl wrote:
> Shouldn't the vbounce ruleset help here?
Yes, it does. :)
> I'm asking because me and my users have the same problem and I am
> currently considering giving the ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE a higher score
> but I am not sure yet whether it's a good i
On 2008-11-03, 10:13, Bob Kinney wrote:
> but had one unfortunate side effect: E-mail forwarded from another
> account to an account on our servers was considered a "bounce"
> because it hit __BOUNCE_RPATH_NULL.
Uhmm... interesting. What exactly might cause this?
I tried to trigger this behaviou
We use zimbra OSS on SLES10 SP1. Zimbra has spamassassin
built-in. At the present time, my mailbox is filled with
backscatter; getting around 10 a minute since 4:30 today. I have
postfix backscatter rules in postfix of zimbra,
http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html#real but still
getting p
On 2008-10-29, 18:44, Chris Arnold wrote:
> We use zimbra OSS on SLES10 SP1. Zimbra has spamassassin
> built-in. At the present time, my mailbox is filled with
> backscatter; getting around 10 a minute since 4:30 today. I have
> postfix backscatter rules in postfix of zimbra,
> http://www.postfix.
On Mon, November 3, 2008 12:02, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> ^http:.*\.spaces\.live\.com\/$
> in its body but the From: header identifies a completely unrelated
> address. Would a rule that tags messages with this From and URI combo be
> useful or would it generate too many FPs?
http://www.nabble.com
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Thursday, October 30, 2008, 12:56:53 PM, Micah Anderson wrote:
I keep getting hit by phishing attacks, and they aren't being stopped by
anything I've thrown up in front of them:
[...]
I've got spamassassin 3.2.5 with URIBL plugin loaded (which I understand
pulls in the 25
Micah Anderson wrote:
* Kelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-30 17:29-0400]:
Micah Anderson wrote:
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
DSBL has shut down, and you should remove the query from your list. It
won't help with the phishing, but it'll free up some network resources.
In
Joseph Brennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We get some legitimate email from @live.com users.
>
> But they don't set a Reply-to header. That's the test.
But that wasn't his question; he asked whether any legitimate mail flows
from live.com. That was my answer. :)
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PRO
mouss wrote:
> Per Jessen wrote:
>>
>>>From the business point of view, one also has to consider the cost
>> involved in changing all the stationery, website, businesscards,
>> brochures, etc etc etc ...
>>
>
> it is not necessary to change these. a second domain name that points
> to the "prim
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 22:36 -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
> Joseph Brennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > First pass:
> >
> > header LOCAL_REPLYTO_LIVE Reply-to =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> > score LOCAL_REPLYTO_LIVE8.0
> >
> > Maybe scoring 8.0 for
On Nov 2, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Micah Anderson wrote:
I have spamd setup to use bayes in a mysql database, works fine. I've
turned off auto-expiry and instead run a cronjob to expire in the
middle
of the night (removes about 40k tokens on a run). I've made the DB
innoDB so it can handle lockin
Hi,
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Chris Arnold wrote:
> We use zimbra OSS on SLES10 SP1. Zimbra has spamassassin built-in. At the
> present time, my mailbox is filled with backscatter; getting around 10 a
> minute since 4:30 today. I have postfix backscatter rules in postfix of
> zimbra, http://www.post
Don't see this on a web site any where..the URL works but there's
mention/documentation of if I can find.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Yet Another Ninja [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 01 November 20
SM wrote:
> At 10:18 02-11-2008, Per Jessen wrote:
>>OK, this is beginning to be annoying - I've seen it 4-5 times in the
>>last week. I'll probably have to cobble up a quick spamd
>>auto-restart. Is no-one else running spamd and using SIGHUP for
>>reloading the config?
>
> The configuration r
20 matches
Mail list logo
