Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>> I was about to open a bugreport on this until I did a search for
>> spamd reports:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=spamd
>
> That's a rather broad comment plain-text search and includes totally
> unrelated stuff.
>
> Instead, tr
I have setup qmail-scanner to quarantine and notify admin for any spam
receive. I just notice that it tagged an email which was legitimate (false
positive).
As I check spamd.log, I saw
AWL,FAKE_REPLY_C,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK
FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,HS_FORGED_OE_FW
AWL,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,HS_FORGED_OE_FW
AW
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
Spamers are using MY E-Mail spaming
russian servers and now Ihave gotten nearly
200.000 backscatters which make my account unusable
specialy for my customers and peoples which
urgently need my help without passing over mailinglists...
So
> Spamers are using MY E-Mail spaming
> russian servers and now Ihave gotten nearly
> 200.000 backscatters which make my account unusable
> specialy for my customers and peoples which
> urgently need my help without passing over mailinglists...
So you do deliver the backscatter? Why
> I was about to open a bugreport on this until I did a search for spamd
> reports:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=spamd
That's a rather broad comment plain-text search and includes totally
unrelated stuff.
Instead, try limiting your search on Component spamc
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:07:15PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> I was about to open a bugreport on this until I did a search for spamd
> reports:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=spamd
>
> There are 195 reports, of which 90% or more seem to be new. Has the
> spamd
Per Jessen wrote:
> Following a SIGHUP of spamd, spamd decided to just stop:
>
> Oct 25 01:20:38 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: prefork: child states: IBBII
> Oct 25 01:20:38 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: spamd: handled cleanup of child
> pid 21529 due to SIGCHLD Oct 25 01:20:39 louiswu7 spamd[21548]: spamd
> rel
Am 2008-10-20 09:53:10, schrieb John Hardin:
> Michelle, Benny, et. al., why do you seek to shift your burden onto the
> rest of us?
>
> When I hit "reply" on a message from the SA list, the only recipient is
> the original sender. The list is configured this way and the SA list
> admins may ha
Am 2008-10-20 18:53:16, schrieb Matt Kettler:
> No, but if the post volume bothers you, I would strongly set your
> subscription to not email you the messages, and check them over any of
> the web archives noted on the website.
I do not know, what you mean, since I am set to "NOMAIL".
I have neve
Am 2008-10-20 09:43:40, schrieb Koopmann, Jan-Peter:
>
> > but unfortunately I get per day nearly 100 useles CarbonCopies
> and now 28.000 backscatters plus regular spam of 3-6000.
>
> What do you mean by "get"? You actually deliver those backscatters to
> your users? Or do you detect them q
> On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 10:03 +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
> Which third-party rule-sets do you use? Can you perhaps
> identify one that triggers this?
>
> guenther
Well, I went and activated compilation. I had earlier removed
/var/lib/spamsassassin/compiled folder, and
now it works! No
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 10:03 +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> >
> > The most important issues here are to get a usable SA,
> > and to get a useful bug report. In that order.
> Oh, I forgot that re2c. It is re2c 0.12.1 from some Debian repo. I use
> also backports..
OK, re2c 0.12.1 should work jus
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:39:58PM +0200, Henrik K wrote:
>
> The workaround would be something like:
> From =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED](?:\b|[^.-])/i
Blah, for those who care, here is a somewhat working and "safe" kludge..
/[EMAIL PROTECTED]([^a-z0-9.-]|$)/
Time to create some complex regex for :addr.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:48:13AM +0200, Henrik K wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:20:14AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:59:42AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > > > "Jorge Valdes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > news:[EMAIL PROT
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:20:14AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:59:42AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > > "Jorge Valdes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >I have just discovered a small bug in 70_sare_head
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:59:42AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > "Jorge Valdes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >I have just discovered a small bug in 70_sare_header.cf:
> > > >
> > > >headerSARE_FREE_WEBM_RuMailFrom =~ /[EMAIL PROTECT
On 10/27/2008 9:59 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
"Jorge Valdes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have just discovered a small bug in 70_sare_header.cf:
headerSARE_FREE_WEBM_RuMailFrom =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
which should be:
headerSARE_FREE_WEBM_Ru
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:59:42AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > "Jorge Valdes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >I have just discovered a small bug in 70_sare_header.cf:
> > >
> > >headerSARE_FREE_WEBM_RuMailFrom =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
> > >
> "Jorge Valdes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >I have just discovered a small bug in 70_sare_header.cf:
> >
> >headerSARE_FREE_WEBM_RuMailFrom =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
> >
> >which should be:
> >
> >headerSARE_FREE_WEBM_RuMailFrom =~ /[EMAIL PROTEC
"Jorge Valdes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have just discovered a small bug in 70_sare_header.cf:
headerSARE_FREE_WEBM_RuMailFrom =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
which should be:
headerSARE_FREE_WEBM_RuMailFrom =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
otherwise it wi
> On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 23:24 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Am 25.10.2008 17:22 Uhr, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
>
> The most important issues here are to get a usable SA,
> and to get a useful bug report. In that order.
>
> Clearly, "it doesn't work" is in no case a useful report.
> I did
21 matches
Mail list logo
