> On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 17:35 +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
>> Am 25.10.2008 17:22 Uhr, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
>>
>>> Any chance you touched your system and Perl?
>>
>> Maybe. there is/was a bug in perl 5.10.* I think that
>> was fixed.
>
> Obviously, Jari is using Perl 5.8.x and SA 3.2.5, as c
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 17:35 +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
> Am 25.10.2008 17:22 Uhr, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
>
> > Any chance you touched your system and Perl?
>
> Maybe. there is/was a bug in perl 5.10.* I think that was fixed.
Obviously, Jari is using Perl 5.8.x and SA 3.2.5, as can be seen in
Am 25.10.2008 17:22 Uhr, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> Any chance you touched your system and Perl?
Maybe. there is/was a bug in perl 5.10.* I think that was fixed.
> Yes, this might have an
> impact on SpamAssassin. Kind of reminds me of the broken re2c 0.11.x
> issue discussed when SA 3.2.0 h
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 02:52 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> Somehow, suddenly my SpamAssassin is broken.
>
> /usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error:
> /var/lib/spamassassin/compiled/5.008/3.002005/auto/Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0/body_0.so:
> undefined symbol: Mail_SpamAssassin_Compile
